AmadeusD

(well aware you did not ask me.. Just adding a perspective as I'm reading CPR right now for the first time so feel like i need this type of thing to n...

Yes sir ^^ @"Michael" But they are not objectively true. I guess they must be relatively true in light of what does exist - exclusion. Hmm. Thanks for...

I may be needing to adjust my view here because there is no object. There is no objective reality to non-existence, brute fact maybe? Unsure. But ther...

Given he also identifies a few “easy” problems of consciousness I think you’re safe here :)

While I think probably “yes” I don’t think its a lack of correlation with a state of affairs. It’s a state of affairs which lacks some “thing”. I see ...

Errr. Okay lol.

Speaking only to the earlier portion, as i'm actually not too up the relationship between Libertarianism and other identitarian pursuits:| Huh. My exp...

Why is “your” in parentheses?

I doubt this will come as novel but that’s exactly how I read Hume.

I’m just trying to get back to a place of good faith, whether we think the other has missed a specific point in a specific thread being irrelevant :) ...

Hehe. “We ought to get on well”.

Listen mate, I understand that obtuseness comes natural; but I’m here to have fun. Far be it from me ;)

As a legal professional, yep. Fully agreed. Regardless of the possibility that it was, in hindsight, right, there’s always a niggling Kantian asking w...

If that's what you need to think, far be it from me.

Thats a single vice? Nice dude.

(am not trained in constitutional law, but law in general). Yes. It has to meet the benchmark for 'fair trial rights' being preserved, though. That ca...

That is an impressive control mechanism.

That is a curtailment of free speech, as i understand it. Unfortunately, it's actually the legal proceeding protocol that matters, so your conclusion ...

the absence of anything but that one mind exists in scenario 1. In scenario two, this extends to "but those two minds". While your example here is inf...

HI Banno... Hmm..This is likely to be my last reply in this exchange and so f'ing help me i will stick to that, unless something fruitful comes of it....

That's nice dear.

It is EXACTLY 180proof's attitude that resulted in the first T election. I see, clearly, from outside the US, this happening again. Biden has been suc...

I can't help but laugh at the lack of self-awareness here. The exact same attitude present in those who went gung-ho and demonized those resistant to ...

I dont understand the problem. A plumber can have opinions about other plumbers that don't comport with those plumber's attitudes. A materialist philo...

Such a good way of setting this out - and I think what i would reference here is the ethical considerations around vegetarianism. You get quotes from ...

:ok:

:cheer:

that was me for a long time. Sometime in 2021 I got into her then-new album Chemtrails Over The Country Club. Represented something wholly different f...

I believe i have seen Chalmers reference (perhaps in that 2022 Yale talk?) IIT as a framework for how you could have different 'levels' of consciousne...

Ok, so your statement amounted to claiming that the issue of how consciousness arises is a hard problem is semantic nonsense. Your use of parentheses ...

So many gems in this thread. I'll be coming back rather often I think! https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZegtK54DC4c&pp=ygUKVGhlIEdyYW50cw%3D%3D I'm not...

Yes. I had this going with a friend from a Facebook group but it fizzled out... on their end. LOL. I'm very interested in this type of thing

World war perhap

AH, i f'd up on this one. I did fully misread your direction. You are correct.

My legal training is in the British/New Zealand system - but that case doesn’t deal with definitions of imminent lawless action in the context of a pe...

That may be legally tricky actually depending on the modes of enforcement your book called for.

That, my friend, is corroboration

Thank you for this. That is, happily, not what I was saying. I, in fact, whether wrong or right, indicated my understanding was exactly that what you ...

I think I’ve found the “cool kids”

....whatt????

Given that i take both of you to have avoided the problem you face entirely (including in this comment - which is condescending and bizarre in many wa...

Hmmm. this comes across entirely a non sequitur in the face of what Bob Ross has outlined. He is, from what i can make out, making an emotionalist arg...

It is a statement of belief. If you don't have something of more substance than to just repeat the statement, in the face of this objection, we have n...

:ok:

If this is for me, I have. Multiple times, and have now decided to refrain from repeating myself. It's an opinion, and nothing more. I reject that it'...

@"hypericin" Agree with the above.. Not the whole way through it; but very interesting and I imagine a fairly colourful area to be discussed at -large...

Or... so strange, i know... maybe... You're not supporting your point in such a great way? That's my conclusion. So, as i say. I think we're probably ...

We;re getting somewhere... :P

No, I don't. And i have explicitly covered why not multiple times, so i'm refrain from repeating my very much coherent answer to this charge again. It...

No. I did cover this. It is explicitly not entailed by acting on what is thought to be the best option. My own fallibility precludes me from concludin...