AmadeusD

It is not my problem if the emperor has no clothes, Vaskane. Bizarre. Can you let me know your reasoning for this? Rather htan your claim? I have. Mul...

It appears you are firmly incapable of considering other, polite, possibilities. That said: Ignoring your continuous ad hominem, Fine. Nothing abhorre...

A wonderful set of references.

"Cause I'm much more fluid than most people here are and am capable of going with the flow quite well. Look how many BSoDs that one simple question ca...

Whether it's me or you, I have no idea what you're getting at.

The philosophical one is. Having not resolved anything hehe. But there's much to be said about that assertion.

I got the feeling this wasn't on the menu, for this interlocutor. I have a feeling moral realists are necessarily unable to bridge the gap we're genui...

LOL.

(I use this list format for clarity only; not at all a function of exasperation or anything like can sometimes be inferred) 1. No. Legal professional ...

Given that, even within the quoted passage, i note that these are 'misguided' emotions, I would say it's fairly clear this is not my position personal...

By 'individualized' are you just speaking to a 'group' adequately delineating itself? I ask, as i don't recognize what you're describing in these move...

Not quite. I delineated sentience from consciousness (or that was my intention). Because your definition to my mind (and maybe RogueAIs) doesn’t rise ...

Definitely Hitler

:ok:

Well yes and no - yes; that’s right, but no I was attempting to explain why. Their claim of truth doesn’t amount to anything. Perhaps they do. I can’t...

Yeah for sure it boils down to this. I think there are certainly novel ways of thinking not available to that everyday normal consciousness. I think w...

I would agree(with this description of the position). But I do have a problem equating something which can be necessarily inferred from a state of aff...

there is no objective. Objective means with respect to the object rather than the subject. If there is no object to refer, where’s the objectivity? Th...

No it isn’t.

This forum certainly makes me feel as if philosophers maybe are redundant but not philosophy. We just need to do better at it.

No. Asking you to clarify yourself I see you’ve answered a question with a question. Neato

You've claimed it 'gives every appearance' to have truth in it. I disagree (but that's probably already known, and isn't too relevant here - it just e...

I think thats what's at stake

Is the point here that you are perceiving truth in it, therefore it is a truth-evaluative statement? As my previous question, im not objecting, just w...

I'm sorry, why are you being a dick? I'm trying, very politely, to assist you to understand that I did not ever hold the view you're saying I had to w...

So, i'm not entirely sure I'm grasping what you mean, but taking a stab: Yes, i would think if there are multiple systems interacting that would const...

Yet, the case is that i made a mistake in replying to fast. My position hasn't changed one iota. I'm really not understanding what you're not getting ...

I have no idea why you're saying this. I made an error of laziness by not reading adequately closely, the statement you made. Therefore, my response w...

This is absolutely the case. And i've certainly learnt to be far more careful. I've cleaned a fair bit of egg from my face. Not really. I queried why ...

Hmm, i tend to feel this is the case, but isn't there a good argument that since there is literally no other source of data (i.e, no matter how many p...

Again, prefer interacting with adults. Take care mate :)

Actually it’s the notifications. I can’t mute you.

I don’t care.

*sigh* I have no idea how to get this through to you lol - I misspoke. I walked nothing back. Given that I entirely overlooked where I misspoke you to...

The 2010s for me.

Nice, thank you mate. Really appreciate the grace. It's been a really cool thread.

1. No. You took a tongue-in-cheek response a bit too seriously, because that response contained a total mis-step on my part. The claim was never made....

Not at all, no. But i am outlining that the claim was misconstrued, and that was likely my fault. I really don't care how we got here. I am telling yo...

@"Leontiskos" (sorry, only realised after the fact that this isn't going to include you otherwise) I have clarified this multiple times, at much pain ...

I don't make that claim. You seem to be replacing some of my terms to support your response. i shouldn't torture babies. Yes, that is exactly the case...

A uniquely bad thinker. This may be our difference, lol.

Hmm. I'm not quite sure how you're using 'brute' here. The statement can be reduced to the activity of an electron in relation to other particles. It ...

Let me make myself very clear: I do not care. I don't care how many stolen iterations of other people's quotes you can fit into a sophistical wall of ...

I'd rather not be involved in your self-indulgence :)

I give up. Keep your sophistry

This is absolute nonsense. If I don’t know what you mean, I can’t adequately respond. That’s a fact. I have no clue how you think this response says a...

You genuinely appear to be off on a random tangent

Not helpful. My initial issue is that I cannot clarify, myself, what he means. That’s objectively true. So yeah the response are just incomprehensible...

I don’t recognise what you’re saying in any way relative to what I said. Your terms are vague and so my response would be pointless. End.

thanks for the thorough reply. I must say I find most of this fairly much incomprehensible I largely hope that’s just me - it doesn’t seem to address ...