You are viewing the historical archive of The Philosophy Forum.
For current discussions, visit the live forum.
Go to live forum

NotAristotle

Comments

That is not necessarily what I mean when I speak of "seeing reality as it is." As I am presently using it, I mean seeing reality in contradistinction ...
January 11, 2024 at 13:41
By "naturalism" Plantinga seems to mean non-belief in God in this context. It appears that someone who does believe in God can, according to Plantinga...
January 11, 2024 at 02:54
Wouldn't there be the possibility to know one's emotions and thereby know why one is acting? And, is it not the case that if we know how we are going ...
January 11, 2024 at 02:22
Saint Thomas Aquinas distinguishes between per accidens and per se series; the distinction may be relevant to this discussion.
January 11, 2024 at 02:05
The world has such depth, I doubt we will ever run out of things to argue about. :wink:
January 11, 2024 at 01:18
Fair point, I fully support a method that would rule out natural explanations.
January 10, 2024 at 19:08
Right, an informational basis of the universe would seem to hint towards a mind of sorts.
January 10, 2024 at 18:32
Right, but my point is, if it seems like a supernatural mind contributed to an apparent miracle (viz. understanding, intent), then we might as well sa...
January 10, 2024 at 18:22
Surely that is context dependent though. If the miracle is: "my coffee mug is floating!" I don't see how that would suggest any sort of supernatural m...
January 10, 2024 at 17:31
Aren't you just assuming here a "no-miracles" disposition? Because as it has been defined, a miracle would effectively prove a Godlike being, would it...
January 10, 2024 at 17:01
In my opinion, if there were an easy answer to quantum-classical issues it would be elucidating the correct theoretical understanding, although I thin...
January 10, 2024 at 16:37
To put that in my own words, I would say "reductionism" is ill-defined. Perhaps a properly defined reductionism may not be at odds with emergentism at...
January 10, 2024 at 16:03
The information is basic. Metaphorically. Because what is transformed is the physical into the mental, no? Or is it the physical into the physical? En...
January 10, 2024 at 15:53
True, it is a dichotomy I guess, but I think it is worth the trouble because of its explanatory power; namely in explaining why brains are conscious a...
January 09, 2024 at 21:54
Good questions. Were it the case that the use of b-matter turned it into a-matter, that would seem to preclude it from use in an artificial brain, but...
January 09, 2024 at 21:46
Perhaps the history doesn't change the formula; the formula changes the history. Perhaps there are just different kinds of matter (a-matter) and (b-ma...
January 09, 2024 at 21:25
"guiding principles" "to form" "goal" I don't mean to be overly critical - do you mean these terms metaphorically or literally?
January 09, 2024 at 18:56
Thanks for your comments. I've had somewhat of a shift in perspective the last couple days. I now think the question you cited -- why is this energy c...
January 09, 2024 at 18:44
You got it!
January 09, 2024 at 17:33
Although wonderer1 and Christoffer may disagree with me, I think it is not possible. And I think it is not possible because of the kind of history tha...
January 09, 2024 at 17:29
I am unfamiliar with the change from a supernatural to a natural explanation as a "reduction." I am more familiar with taking two scientific fields (c...
January 08, 2024 at 20:11
Here is a definition of reductionism: "a science can be reduced to another field of study if that other field of study gives a coherent account of the...
January 08, 2024 at 19:22
Okay so if I'm understanding you correctly, what I'm calling a physical process emerges from, is a result of, not the physical fundamentals, rather it...
January 07, 2024 at 03:06
Thanks for referring me to that article.
January 06, 2024 at 19:21
In the interest of responding in a not unreasonable amount of time, I'm going to go ahead and write what I'm thinking. The objection is well said. I u...
January 06, 2024 at 00:26
Okay javra, thanks for your comments.
January 05, 2024 at 20:41
Why would it trouble us if everything was reducible to the physical? Seems to me that all those thoughts are just physical processes. I get the sense ...
January 05, 2024 at 20:26
I'm not sure why that is so. Unless by process metaphysics one is arguing that only processes, not the physical constituents involved in the process a...
January 05, 2024 at 19:32
ALL IS COFFEE - NotAristotle (c. 2000 - 2200)
January 05, 2024 at 17:34
Hi Christoffer, I find myself inclined to endorse what I will coin "process physicalism." Due to religious commitments, I do not think "all of reality...
January 05, 2024 at 17:24
Nosferatu, see above.
January 03, 2024 at 17:09
I don't think Congress is the final arbiter of a determination of whether Trump is guilty. That being the case, each Secretary of state can and should...
January 03, 2024 at 17:06
Comment rescinded.
January 03, 2024 at 16:48
But seeing as he is guilty of insurrection, I highly doubt he will be acquitted.
January 03, 2024 at 16:43
Regardless of if he is acquitted for insurrection, I think the Secretary of each state still has a right to make their own determination of whether he...
January 03, 2024 at 16:40
This is a good explanation of how the 14th amendment disqualifies Trump from the upcoming election. https://www.npr.org/2024/01/02/1222389987/donald-t...
January 03, 2024 at 16:35
I'm kind of thinking to take a left turn towards a career in the medical field. So yeah, biology would have been more appropriate. :lol:
January 02, 2024 at 23:14
As a philosophy major, I now have the insight and wisdom to know that I should have picked a different major. Hey, I have 100 comments! Wohoo! Edit: N...
January 02, 2024 at 20:16
Thank you for sharing that.
January 02, 2024 at 20:12
I don't know much about process philosophy; I am surprised that causal closure is not relevant to it. I have to say, too, that the whole notion of "no...
January 02, 2024 at 17:17
I think it is Jaegwon Kim who forwards the argument against non-reductive physicalism. This argument can be picked-up by reductive physicalists who ma...
January 02, 2024 at 00:46
:lol: hey, that boulder's misbehaving, im gonna give it a piece of my mind!
December 29, 2023 at 21:40
There is ego and there is conscience. Therefore there is duality. Where there is duality there is choice. Where there is choice there is freedom. Ther...
December 29, 2023 at 00:43
Yes, it is! :100:
December 29, 2023 at 00:19
I won't get into it too far because I don't think this is the right thread, but I do believe I have a free will and I am not a compatibilist. Whether ...
December 29, 2023 at 00:02
I don't think those details are forthcoming Philosophim, and the reason why is that a physical account fails to include consciousness. I think you are...
December 28, 2023 at 19:32
I wouldn't go so far as to say that anatomy is the reason why someone engages in activities. A full account of why I, let's say, go for a jog, seems t...
December 28, 2023 at 18:45
Okay, gotcha, thanks for explaining.
December 27, 2023 at 22:22
I think my argument is something like this: If consciousness is physical then consciousness can be accounted for in physical terms. But consciousness ...
December 27, 2023 at 21:56
Maybe I'm missing the boat, but when we say "physical" I think we mean things like atoms, brains, neurons, entire organisms, and so on. If consciousne...
December 27, 2023 at 21:54