This is a very very simplified view that does not understand the complexity of genetics. It's not "this code accounts for this trait, this code accoun...
I'm gonna need some more sources before I throw out what I've learned in college about biology. Sadly, a 2003 article on a farmers website that could ...
I was addressing the logic. DNA is made up of nucleotides. It is biochemistry which is just chemistry that is more directed towards biology. Chemical ...
I can't really speak to much about this because I don't know it very well. The reason relativity has to be applied to GPS is because the satellites ar...
I'm not an expert at this, but this is from what I've read from interest. Time is relative. An absolute time doesn't make sense to me. We could use Ea...
I disagree with this because DNA is the formula that directs biology. This can be seen at all levels of life: human, other mammals, reptiles, plants, ...
Here’s an application of relativity showing how time and space are connected, just in case you hadn’t come across this. I copied and pasted this from ...
Society can decide whatever they want to be morally right. The acts have to be similar by being consistent with the presupposed values that society ha...
The reason I was comparing flat and morally right is because flat is a word that describes a concept and unless you change the word, it will be true. ...
If you're saying it doesn't make sense to describe the universe as a whole as being determined or undetermined, it sounds like you aren't a determinis...
All this tells me is that as societies have become more sophisticated, they have as a whole come to value not killing. This could be because attitudes...
What is the reason for labeling this group of acts as morally right? Is the term morally right a label used for this group because it is a useful way ...
The reason I was comparing those two things is because people have been arguing that the killing is wrong as if it is objectively true yet that's what...
It’s pretty clear he’s not gonna answer my question because I think he and everyone else knows what will follow when he responds. At this point he is ...
Okay you win this argument via excessive use of misdirect and intellectual dishonesty. I am now converting to nonbeliefism. I hope everyone else sees ...
Another misdirect. I’ll ask this one more time. If you still refuse to clarify your position by ignoring my question then you’re being intellectually ...
That doesn’t answer my question. In case you forgot, here: If you see a chair in front of you and I asked you "Is there a chair in front of you?" what...
I like the points tou’ve made. I’m still a little unclear on your position. Are you saying that determinism requires something transcendental? and if ...
Back in the day it was morally acceptable to stone homosexuals. That behavior was not in the “in group” for what is morally wrong by definition of the...
I'll rephrase it like this to make it more simple If you see a chair in front of you and I asked you "Is there a chair in front of you?" what would yo...
The difference here is the word morality still means the same thing in both cultures. It means what is right or wrong. So now we have to define those ...
Maybe, maybe not. We won't know till you answer right? So answer the question If you see a chair in front of you, would you make the statement there i...
If there are only 2 cultures that live separately in the world. One culture says it is wrong to needlessly kill and the other culture says it is moral...
That's irrelevant to the point I'm about to make. You are the king of misdirect. If you keep misdirecting then you'll be seen as someone who is intell...
Just answer the question and I will show you why it's relevant when you answer it. I'm doing this so you can clarify your position for me because I st...
If it's so very irrelevant then the point a make after you answer the question will be easy to refute right? Or are you afraid I will prove that you h...
I've seen it. Now answer my question If you see a chair in front of you, would you make the statement there is a chair in front of me, or make the sta...
Okay so you acknowledge that if you accept a claim on evidence it is by definition a belief. Now hang on, before I read any of that, answer my questio...
I rephrased Okay I will demonstrate to you why you are still holding beliefs. A belief is accepting a claim that generally permits ignorance of eviden...
As you even admitted yourself, there is a difference between especially and necessarily. Therefore by definition accepting a claim off of scientific t...
Okay I will demonstrate to you why you are still holding beliefs. A belief is accepting a claim. A belief is accepting a claim, and not exclusively th...
But all that means is that now you are saying that instead of accepting claims, we should only look at things as if more likely or less likely to be t...
I understand what you're saying. I'm just saying using the word nonbeliefism is misleading because the term makes it sound like you don't accept anyth...
The thing is, even if he shows that people generally ignore evidence it doesn't matter. A belief is still a belief regardless of whether it is one bas...
As I've mentioned many times it doesn't necessarily mean it's based off of nonscientific thinking. Especially is not the same thing as necessarily. Th...
Which definition? The first one? That says especially, not necessarily. So if you are accepting something to be true off of science thinking, it still...
Oh okay my bad I misunderstood lol. And it is a strange thing to think about. Your examples still seemed like they would be a type of subjective moral...
It's not that I disagree with your idea of nonbeliefism, it's that I just don't see the reason for throwing out a term like that. Nonbeliefism sounds ...
Yeah, but I'm not asserting that objective morality is impossible or that morality is subjective. If you read the OP completely, you would see that. I...
What reason do you have for thinking that this will you speak of is immaterial and not dependent on the physical brain, or that there is some sort of ...
For me specifically yes. You could have just said this from the start I don't disagree with this lol. However some people will argue that their values...
Comments