Jackson

It is a joke, but true. "God said it, I believe it, that settles it." Discussions about religion and theism are mostly futile.

Thanks. Had to look that up.

Agree.

It is like saying everyone either lives in Paris or not. World is Parisians (God) or non-Parisians(Atheist).

That is it,yes.

Absolutely agree.

False.

Name it.

No. "I do not believe in God therefore I do not believe in God."

I did not say that.

Ok. Nothing to do with what I said.

Are you saying atheists are amoral?

Sorry, I really don't understand what you're saying.

ok

Most people would not call an airplane a horse.

Do you believe an airplane is a horse?

Horses cannot fly.

That is what I wrote.

Anything that can be referred to is a thing. Whether it has physical existence is a different question. Do unicorns exist? Yes. Do flying horses exist...

In the US it is the GOP fascist party versus democracy.

Conservatives use the "far left" as a rhetorical device to devalue liberals. A meaningless term.

"Exist" is not well defined.

False or unprovable.

False.

Please explain.

no

The fallacy is that my experience is determined by the way others see me.

I do not see your point.

Kant writes paragraph long sentences. At the end you can't remember what the point was.

I've seen writing manual mention that. Tell the reader where the argument is and where it is going.

Okay, I should not comment anymore.

Derrida has some good ideas, but his writing and explication can be tedious.

Kant is a terrible writer. Hume and Descartes are good writers. Bertrand Russell is a good writer.

Well said, agree. Capitalism for the masses. Socialism for the wealthy.

What is positive side of killing someone for fun? Nothing to do with moral or immoral. Why would any society want people to do it?

No. Just what I said. Stabbing people for fun. What culture thinks that is good?

Would not agree with that assertion. Does any culture believe stabbing and murdering people is acceptable (outside of war!)?

Perhaps. But who guides their life by what is not impossible?

ok

Agree with that.

Why does there have to be a reason?

Who criticized him and for what? Marx called himself a materialist and differed only on what he called Hegel's idealism.

Seems to me at the core. Marx thought of himself as Hegelian.

Every reason has another reason behind it. At some point we just have to accept that we are here and the world exists.

Thanks. I don't have the knowledge about this, something to learn about.

Marx was Hegelian--the concept of history as dialectical

This interests me. Can you say more about the Hegelian influence on AI?

Because it is capitalism.

Cannot argue with that.

ok