You are viewing the historical archive of The Philosophy Forum.
For current discussions, visit the live forum.
Go to live forum

S

Comments

No, rationality can't be irrational, since that'd be a contradiction in terms.
February 17, 2017 at 16:34
Yes, it's garbage. This will give you some ideas as to why: http://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Daily_Mail
February 17, 2017 at 16:30
Unfortunately, in some cases, some of the most popular are some of the least reliable. Fox News was the most-watched network in all of cable in 2016.
February 17, 2017 at 16:21
So, you were playing devil's advocate? I don't know why you won't directly answer my question. The assumption of rationality is made, at the least, fo...
February 17, 2017 at 16:02
Yes. Right. I'm not loyal to my country, like I said. You seemed be contradicting what I said. What you are trying to tell me here seems no different ...
February 17, 2017 at 15:35
You say that, but you have not directly addressed what I was referring to, so I don't see how you have not done so. You've made statements which seem ...
February 17, 2017 at 14:26
Strawman. I'm simply following your trail of thought blood. I'll repeat my question: what be the difference between the belief of a raven and a real w...
February 17, 2017 at 06:18
Yes, it suits my needs not to waste my time with someone who asks stupid questions that they should already know the answer to. Sorry. You'll have to ...
February 17, 2017 at 04:39
You're not so much following it, as questioning it to the point of ridiculousness. Like if I responded to the above as follows: But what does "mean" m...
February 17, 2017 at 04:27
But if you can't answer that question yourself, then I'd rather not pursue it. To me, it is like the questions I asked you in my last reply.
February 17, 2017 at 04:16
Not sure. Probably a reason not too dissimilar to yours. Boredom? An impulse? An urge to correct? Naïvety? Masochism?
February 17, 2017 at 03:59
So, you're not giving up on omnibenevolence, but you're not committed to it either. Otherwise, that'd be inconsistent with your second sentence. So, t...
February 17, 2017 at 03:39
Yes, I think you're right, given that context. That's probably what he had in mind. Although that doesn't actually follow if you take that phrase at f...
February 17, 2017 at 03:33
I don't believe that you have a valid counterexample to anything that I've claimed. The people who react in that way in that situation do so for a rea...
February 17, 2017 at 03:08
Honestly, why are you asking me that? Whatever next? How do you tie your shoe laces? How do you know that a bicycle isn't a tree?
February 17, 2017 at 02:17
But the problem of evil makes assumptions which could easily be avoided with that approach, and it would cease to be a problem for you. It'd be possib...
February 16, 2017 at 22:46
Why would it mean that? If it's a mystery, then wouldn't that just mean that that's possible, but we don't know? And that would equally apply to other...
February 16, 2017 at 22:11
No. It can actually work against you, since adults can do or allow bad things without good reason and/or for bad reasons (and children can be obliviou...
February 16, 2017 at 21:57
Your argument doesn't resolve the problem of evil. Ignorance doesn't resolve the problem, it leaves it unresolved. An explanation would set the record...
February 16, 2017 at 21:51
You don't ask for much, do you? Why is he doing all of the work? Aren't you capable of answering these questions yourself? You have the internet at yo...
February 16, 2017 at 21:26
The part in bold is begging the question. You're just assuming your conclusion in one or more of the premises. This is another logical fallacy, like t...
February 16, 2017 at 19:31
Are you claiming that these examples outweigh the counter-evidence? Because, in reality, there are so many examples of so many people reacting in this...
February 16, 2017 at 18:18
:-}
February 16, 2017 at 13:18
Your original comment was funnier.
February 16, 2017 at 12:59
Exactly.
February 16, 2017 at 12:47
That's a red herring.
February 16, 2017 at 12:46
You've twisted what I said there by adding your own words to it and altering the meaning. So, even if that is faulty logic, you will have only succeed...
February 16, 2017 at 12:41
That's a red herring.
February 16, 2017 at 11:44
Why are you attacking this straw man? My position has never been that causality is simple likelihood. I already clarified that for you. I was talking ...
February 16, 2017 at 11:37
(Y)
February 16, 2017 at 11:25
Yes, for the umpteenth time, you are wrong. If analogies like the one quoted below don't cause you to realise that your reasoning is fallacious, then ...
February 16, 2017 at 11:23
True. I just hope that there aren't too many others in the electorate who think like him.
February 16, 2017 at 11:09
Twitter users are annoying. They block you at the drop of a hat and can't stomach disagreement. The guy that I was talking to was a moron, anyway. He ...
February 16, 2017 at 10:48
I played a little bit of one of the BioShock games years ago when I was round my friend's house, but that was it (until the other day after I bought t...
February 11, 2017 at 18:45
I currently have both, but in the back of my mind is the worry that I'm acting more like the grasshopper in Aesop's fable.
February 09, 2017 at 23:02
I caved in and bought BioShock: The Collection for £20. And there's no point kidding myself, I'll probably buy all of the others I mentioned too at so...
February 09, 2017 at 22:45
This talk of A and B is too simplistic, since in reality, there is A, B, C, D, etc. What I am saying is that we know that A is likely to cause B, whic...
February 09, 2017 at 22:36
No, not judging, being judgemental.
February 09, 2017 at 22:02
I thought that I might get that response. I meant that I'm fully loyal to those parts. The way that you worded it could be interpreted to contradict t...
February 09, 2017 at 13:12
Whether it is or isn't, tending and probability clearly relate to causality, and are relevant to it. If knowledge of a cause is uncertain, then it can...
February 09, 2017 at 12:52
Your first reply, which was the very first reply to the opening post, and the first reply that I read. It wasn't as harsh or strongly worded as Hanove...
February 09, 2017 at 12:32
I wasn't expecting that kind of reply. I've only become self-sufficient (or at least considerably more so) in recent years. I only moved out from my m...
February 09, 2017 at 02:41
Okay. Well, that is true. But I don't agree with what some of the other people in this thread, and perhaps you yourself, have judged to be a problem.
February 09, 2017 at 01:55
The only one of those I had was Shadow of Mordor. It was good for a while, until I completed the main stuff. I never care about 100% completion or tro...
February 09, 2017 at 01:11
I don't quite get what's supposed to be analogous to what - or who - in that analogy, to be honest. Or what the point of it is supposed to be. You mig...
February 09, 2017 at 00:36
/uploads/files/d4/v51esggcg4hejatu.jpg
February 08, 2017 at 23:51
I don't think my accusations against Hanover are overblown. He called you pathetic for doing a job you find rewarding and for living with someone you ...
February 08, 2017 at 23:24
Every situation isn't exactly the same, but most have things in common, and they tend to produce the same sort of result way more often than not. They...
February 08, 2017 at 22:37
I never suggested otherwise. If you look back over our discussion, you will see that. My objection was against your not counting that - namely, someon...
February 08, 2017 at 20:55
Okay. Perhaps I was reading more into it than was present. But then, you used the word "idiot" which I think is telling. You were judging their reacti...
February 08, 2017 at 20:33