You are viewing the historical archive of The Philosophy Forum.
For current discussions, visit the live forum.
Go to live forum

S

Comments

The right have a tendency to be just as moralistic and lacking in humour as the left, if not more so. So I don't agree. Think pro-life or views on gay...
February 20, 2017 at 12:26
I don't know about that. I realise that you were making a generalisation, but Margaret Thatcher wasn't exactly a barrel of laughs, and two of my favou...
February 20, 2017 at 12:15
You've probably read a lot more than I have on this topic, but the one book I've been going back to makes me doubt any more moderate proposals. For ex...
February 20, 2017 at 11:11
You agreed to those words yourself in a previous comment on the previous page only hours ago. You said "Yes, that's my stand". :-} The real question i...
February 20, 2017 at 02:31
That's all you have to say in reply, is it? Funny how you seem to be suggesting that you know nothing, yet you also claim to understand God to a signi...
February 20, 2017 at 01:19
Oh. Well, your criticisms were directed at leftists, and I identify as a leftist - although not as you describe.
February 20, 2017 at 01:12
Like the one I referred to twice. And yet, I am on the left. Remarkable. Perhaps it's wrong to make hasty generalisations about the left, eh Thorongil...
February 20, 2017 at 00:54
I can't get the theme tune from Sister, Sister out of my head. Help. It's been popping into my head for days.
February 19, 2017 at 23:14
Only some, and they do with that last one, at least with regards to morality and culture. I don't agree with any of the other claims.
February 19, 2017 at 22:57
>:O Very funny. "The rat will never be the horse." "Well, if he works very hard..." "No."
February 19, 2017 at 22:40
I wouldn't go as far as advocating a government planned economy, although I don't completely rule that out. I'm just very sceptical of it, given its f...
February 19, 2017 at 22:14
Pray really hard. And if that doesn't work, sacrifice Agustino to the gods. And if neither of those work. Click the square picture icon above where yo...
February 19, 2017 at 22:02
Castro's rallying cry was "Socialism or death!". Yours would be something like "Socialism! But everything else first!".
February 19, 2017 at 21:58
Paradoxically, the right cause is the left cause. (You're too far to the right, and are not a true leftie).
February 19, 2017 at 21:45
If that day ever comes, I will move abroad. Or maybe attempt an assassination. :D
February 19, 2017 at 21:30
If someone like you were running the country (touch wood), I would most certainly be a lot more politically active.
February 19, 2017 at 21:21
That's outrageous. (Yeah, yeah - butt-hurt liberal, whatever).
February 19, 2017 at 21:11
Predicable. Look, why don't you do your own research, if you haven't already, and make your own mind up about him? I qualified my comments by saying t...
February 19, 2017 at 20:59
I agree with that. Even if I was guaranteed to go through all of that successfully, for me, it would simply not be worth the bother. Fuck that. Fuck e...
February 19, 2017 at 20:46
I'm in a sort of middle ground between pro-choice and pro-life, and am anti-Pruitt, so, in a nutshell, sometimes choosing death is acceptable, and bro...
February 19, 2017 at 19:54
Really? Can't you just look him up. He has been described as a fierce critic of the very agency that he is now heading, the Environmental Protection A...
February 19, 2017 at 19:36
That uncharitable characterisation is itself based on an uncharitable characterisation. I never said that Scott Pruitt is pro-death. But he does pose ...
February 19, 2017 at 19:29
This is actually false or misleading when it comes to the topic we've been discussing, as evidenced in that book I referred to earlier: Many scientist...
February 19, 2017 at 19:05
If that's what makes you sleep at night...
February 19, 2017 at 18:41
But both of those are irrelevant to my point. I never argued that it was more certain than predictions about what would happen if a pregnant woman had...
February 19, 2017 at 18:38
It's not a remote possibility. Shall I quote you what some of the authorities on this have said? That makes sense to me, but when it comes to the topi...
February 19, 2017 at 18:22
No, I don't that think that we were being uncharitable, I think that you just worded it poorly, so as to suggest something you didn't mean to suggest....
February 19, 2017 at 18:11
You seemed to suggest multiple times that certainty is such a requirement. That's how I understood your comments, and that also seems to be how Michae...
February 19, 2017 at 17:24
Spot on.
February 19, 2017 at 17:08
But you haven't actually answered some of those key points. Your example with the monkey and geometry is just a reiteration of your argument which I'v...
February 19, 2017 at 16:59
I don't consider that to be a proper reply, since you've avoided parts of my reply, your reply is too short, you've made bald assertions without expla...
February 19, 2017 at 16:45
I don't think that that quote should be taken quite so literally. I very much doubt that he meant that it's impossible to understand quantum mechanics...
February 19, 2017 at 15:42
No, you haven't. The problem isn't directed at everyone. Just because you might have found a way in which it is not a problem for you, that doesn't me...
February 19, 2017 at 15:30
This issue could easily be resolved if you only mean that you don't understand these these things. But if you go further than that and claim that you ...
February 19, 2017 at 15:09
I wonder how many atheists actually fit his description, or how many would agree with what he presupposes about them. I, for one, do not think of eith...
February 19, 2017 at 01:04
Isn't it amusing that you can quote Agustino to argue against Agustino? :D "To claim stuff with your certainty is nothing but idiocy" - Agustino.
February 19, 2017 at 00:41
As you say, that's going against their country, but in its best interests. I'm loyal to the best interests of my country, but not loyal to my country ...
February 19, 2017 at 00:02
Haven't you done just that when the joke has been about something you disapprove of, like abortion? Or, do you no longer have a gripe with the likes o...
February 18, 2017 at 23:36
But it can't be that important to you. Otherwise that would be yet another reason why you should not have voted for Trump if you had've had the chance...
February 18, 2017 at 22:41
It's an informed prediction based on evidence. I never claimed certainty, but there is reason enough to be very concerned. You don't even know who Sco...
February 18, 2017 at 22:17
I don't mean to be rude, but did your reply really need to be that lengthy? The key point of our disagreement is semantic: about what it means to be l...
February 18, 2017 at 21:56
Sure, it isn't certain - doesn't need to be. It also isn't just someone - it's Scott Pruitt. And it also isn't just an appointment - it's an appointme...
February 18, 2017 at 20:58
Speculative certainty? I don't need to speculate and I don't need to be certain. The evidence is sufficient. And be inconsistent. Well, go ahead, laug...
February 18, 2017 at 20:39
You don't have an answer? Shortsighted. Pretty sure I mentioned future generations.
February 18, 2017 at 20:29
So you find this a laughing matter, but not jokes about abortion? Even though both are literally a matter of life and death? How is this consistent wi...
February 18, 2017 at 20:16
Less than 24 hours ago, news reports began to appear that Scott Pruitt has been sworn in as head of the Environmental Protection Agency. Scott Pruitt,...
February 18, 2017 at 20:08
So, when you made those statements about God, you were either playing devil's advocate or you've retracted them, and you don't want to say which it is...
February 18, 2017 at 19:43
You don't say? That was a pointless comment. Obviously I don't believe that it is a valid counterexample for a reason, and it is that reason, rather t...
February 18, 2017 at 19:31
Okay, now you seem to be contradicting yourself. You said that the form of loyalty itself is what I adhere to and not the country. Am I loyal to my co...
February 18, 2017 at 19:21
I missed these replies. I simply didn't see your remarks against Hanover. They did escape my notice. I haven't read much of this discussion and I didn...
February 17, 2017 at 18:04