L'éléphant

I'm linking a thread here where there are articles linked to support biological changes leading to intelligence of humans. https://thephilosophyforum....

It means, as we speak, AI remains to be a computer. Until someone had created a human with human minds, let's keep this discussion within the reality ...

You can't talk about evolution without the biology. That's what evolution explains -- the biological changes in humans.

Until then, let's stick to reality.

Sorry, but AI intelligence is not the same as human intelligence. I've also been outspoken about this in another thread. We can't say that computing i...

Biology, evolution -- whatever it takes.

I've posted links in this thread: https://thephilosophyforum.com/discussion/12484/the-decline-of-intelligence-in-modern-humans I need to revisit those...

No I have not provided you with the how. I've only been talking about examples of consciousness. So, we can proceed then to discuss how biology is the...

What is lacking in our accepted definition/description of consciousness? Because I'm good with it. But if you're not, what's your definition of consci...

So what's your opinion if we only stay within Newberry's parameter?

Oops, actually, I meant to include Philosophy there. I didn't review my post. But yes, I agree. Uhm, yeah that's what I meant -- we do know through th...

What does and does not have consciousness is an inter-disciplinary topic covered by biology, psychology, and specialized areas such as neurology. Of c...

This is, again, confusing the how with the why question by those who answer the question that way. They're answering the how thinking they're providin...

Good to look at.

You can only if P8: is defined in your theory. Otherwise, do equivalence or some other logic axioms. Or embed Prov_T() in Prov_U().

No. Advertising to the public does not create a legal or binding relation with the audience. You could ignore advertising. I think it's clear from the...

I thought those were dance steps. Welcome back! Good to know you're not hurt.

@"L'éléphant"

For purposes of expediency, let's stick to the description below that Streetlight provided, see quote below. I'm cool with it. So, if that is so, then...

So, I decided to self-diagnose the affliction I contracted reading this thread ( :sweat: sorry for lack of a better metaphor. I posted previously that...

It's a good one.

Funny in science, the why overlaps the how and in an attempt to satisfy questions of the why, they would proceed to again explain a phenomenon in term...

No, questioning it is not problematic, or even putting it that way is not problematic. I mistakenly believed that this thread is about an alternative ...

Schopenhauer or Kant.

I'm on board with this! If moral psychology is recognized as testable, verifiable findings on morality, I am a subscriber. I already reject relativism...

I suppose talking in extremes doesn't amount to a productive discussion. There is a point to a discussion, and that is the satisfaction of an inquiry,...

And Tom, precisely those two quotes are what kept me in confusion, among other explanations here. So, I'll try to read up on capitalism. Thanks.

I think this is the first time in my posting on this philosophy forum that I have not successfully gotten the gist/understanding of the OP and further...

You're shallow and you suffer from lack of something in you. This is the true meaning of your desire for physical appearance. I've dated super good lo...

Jesus! This is painful!

Things like engaging in philosophical discourse could only work intrinsically. Do not reach out for the external satisfaction of your torment. Accept ...

I'd like to know at which non-production point would it be sustainable/livable to be. Because I don't think there is in human history a period when al...

Good inquiry.

Good point. It does not. (But it doesn't mean that one is free to do whatever they please). Whether it's objective or subjective, or whatever form it ...

First of all, I'm glad someone is again raising questions about objectivity. Because before anything else, this notion needs to be understood fully. I...

Another talent that's been demonstrated here. haha!

Thank you for accelerating my mediocrity to advance in no time -- and that's without having to put out any project like you did in the videos. Sweet! ...

Now that's the spirit. Stretching is good for the soul. :sweat:

I've come to terms with the thought that I'm not creative.

The irony is that they built the most impressive architecture in the world -- water ducts, coliseum, palaces, government buildings, etc.

You're engaging in true moral discussion and maybe not know you're pushing the correct buttons. 1. Society's compulsion for the individuals to provide...

Okay that, too. That's a separate issue though. If there was a way to keep them regularly clean, then they should work.

This is fair and accurate. Even animals would prefer cleanliness, unless they're ill of some malady. Cats definitely show health by how clean they kee...

This is a myth.

This is the gist of the OP. However we choose to call it -- division of labor, sharing, team-work, pitching-in -- your question is whether it is even ...

I don't think I can. At least not to you. And I don't mean this in a negative way. I'll tell this you this, though, then I'll blow off of this thread:...

Neither is this:

Ugh. Where to begin. If you think the way you do here on this thread, then you have no understanding of human nature yet.

Unless it's a crow. This morning I witnessed a crow trying to cross a crosswalk on a wide intersection. A driver trying to make a right turn couldn't ...

It can be learned, yes. I reserve the special treatment of just quitting to a very few instances. The fight is not worth it. I pick my battle. Would y...