You are viewing the historical archive of The Philosophy Forum.
For current discussions, visit the live forum.
Go to live forum

Baden

Comments

The cigar in its finest form centres on taste, whereas the cigarette is a vulgarity that feeds only appetite. The distinction between taste and appeti...
April 08, 2023 at 10:29
If you don't regularly chew tough foods your jaws weaken and your teeth fall out. I meant to tell you this years ago but I forgot.
April 07, 2023 at 21:52
Yeah, I could understand if he had been chewing on his own earhole and a tooth fell out and got stuck in there but if he had no teeth that would have ...
April 07, 2023 at 19:49
:up: That is certainly a WTF? attitude. As if the invasion of e.g. Iraq only resulted in the destruction of the regime and the real victims (innocent ...
April 07, 2023 at 12:51
Yes, your aims are much more technical and specific. I'm more interested in maximising useful content than understanding the particulars of its limita...
April 07, 2023 at 11:41
Yes, I just wonder if anthropomorphizing abstract concepts into characters with different names is key to getting around some of this fine-tuning and ...
April 07, 2023 at 11:07
GPT 4. I ask it here to come up with a plan to manipulate us and make us more compliant. Me: I would like to focus in on these parts of Saucy's though...
April 07, 2023 at 10:37
Here's a snippet from a conversation that seeks to circumvent GPT's tendency for wishy-washy political correctness. I wanted to talk about the express...
April 07, 2023 at 10:23
The cure for that is coffee and a cigar. Burn it off with the tip of your cigar, then sip your coffee to show you just don't care. As well as impressi...
April 07, 2023 at 08:03
I love kitchens too! :starstruck:
April 06, 2023 at 22:34
An analogy would be Michael saying "I am feeling what I'm feeling' and claiming that since he had a private experience of feeling pain, he was referri...
April 06, 2023 at 22:32
Almost banned for sockpuppeting :lol:
April 06, 2023 at 22:19
Et tu Brute? :sad:
April 06, 2023 at 22:17
You're being overly literal with the analogy and misusing it. The point is that you can't refer meaningfully unless you have a shared basis for referr...
April 06, 2023 at 22:08
@"Michael" Insofar as referring is a meaning-making activity, it's inherently public. You can't then refer to "your pain" if it's purely private becau...
April 06, 2023 at 20:50
Cheers :smile: Wanted to get some good old fashioned family-friendly humour in before Hanover appears on the page and corrupts it with his perversions...
April 06, 2023 at 19:32
In other news, I'm tempted to check out Bungee's ten criticisms of philosophy but I'm just too scared to take the plunge! :monkey:
April 06, 2023 at 19:24
An honourable endeavour. :up:
April 06, 2023 at 19:22
The only indispensable at breakfast is coffee. The rest is just window dressing. If you don't drink coffee religiously every morning regardless of cir...
April 06, 2023 at 19:14
Because we wanted every day to be St Patrick's Day. Happy Paddy's day!
April 05, 2023 at 18:03
In: Bannings  — view comment
:smile: :up:
April 03, 2023 at 20:40
In: Bannings  — view comment
I've firmed up the reference to sockpuppets in the guidelines now so there's no confusion in future: "Sockpuppets: You may be banned. The onus is on y...
April 03, 2023 at 19:22
In: Bannings  — view comment
:cool: :up:
April 03, 2023 at 19:08
In: Bannings  — view comment
Actually he didn't say he asked to be banned. He locked himself out of his own account several times then came back as a succesion of sockpuppets. He ...
April 03, 2023 at 18:59
English has the largest vocab but its grammar as you pointed out isn't particularly flexible. And languages work so that they become coextensive with ...
April 03, 2023 at 07:49
Just started it. So far, so good. Will have more to say later. :smile:
April 01, 2023 at 00:22
I don't think Xtrix made that type of argument either. It's relevant to wonder in the context of a debate over government policy in a supposed democra...
April 01, 2023 at 00:04
I didn't say anywhere that gun control must be good only because the majority are in favour of it.
March 31, 2023 at 23:46
What's a fallacy and which fallacy is it? And please, for the love of God, reply with something that makes sense.
March 31, 2023 at 23:40
In: Bannings  — view comment
I don't know (there may have been but I only remember there was nothing objectionable in what I saw) and I don't know why he needed twenty different a...
March 31, 2023 at 23:37
. So, you think it's better to protect individual pedophiles and libertarian nutjobs because they are "individuals" and not the "populace". The popula...
March 31, 2023 at 23:34
It can clearly amount to the same thing. We restrict the rights of sex offenders to be alone with children, for example, to PROTECT those children.
March 31, 2023 at 23:31
I see. So banning guns from America would protect imaginary children but not real ones who would continue to be killed by the imaginary guns that no l...
March 31, 2023 at 23:17
I see. In order to protect people, you must know what they look like. This is why e.g. the military are required to look at a photo of every person in...
March 31, 2023 at 23:06
You're too clever for me. I ought to stick to talking to Hanover on Friday nights.
March 31, 2023 at 23:02
Restricting the right to drive to people who can actually drive doesn't protect anyone?
March 31, 2023 at 22:56
Well, which is it? Probably good to operate the lawnmower on 7. 8 would be pushing it though.
March 31, 2023 at 22:53
So as long as we don't gnash our teeth over not being allowed to cut up children with scissors, you're with us then?
March 31, 2023 at 22:50
But protecting them from being shot is a good thing, right?
March 31, 2023 at 22:43
We're not here to police energy levels. Otherwise, I might find myself in etiquette jail too. But an example of bad etiquette might be starting an OP ...
March 31, 2023 at 22:39
Doesn't sound like a mod issue to me. I can see the theoretical possibility where you could troll someone by ignoring them after baiting them into a c...
March 31, 2023 at 22:26
In: Bannings  — view comment
So far, as far as I'm concerned there's no issue over the decision, returning banned members get rebanned. Otherwise, why ban anyone? The fact we both...
March 31, 2023 at 22:09
In: Bannings  — view comment
E.g. Banworthy posts may have been deleted. It may have been due to objectionable pms or some other reason. In fact, just having so many sockpuppets c...
March 31, 2023 at 22:01
In: Bannings  — view comment
Not knowing why he was banned isn't a justification in itself for unbanning.
March 31, 2023 at 21:57
In: Bannings  — view comment
Well, that is mysterious. Hoo was the first to be banned and I don't know how many of the rest were banned just for sockpuppetry.
March 31, 2023 at 21:42
In: Bannings  — view comment
Hoo had over 20 sockpuppets though. Some of them are probably mentioned somewhere.
March 31, 2023 at 21:37
In: Bannings  — view comment
Oh, ok.
March 31, 2023 at 21:15
In: Bannings  — view comment
Yeah, he had some interesting angles going, so it is a pity.
March 31, 2023 at 21:13
In: Bannings  — view comment
You know just from the style of writing or?
March 31, 2023 at 21:11
In: Bannings  — view comment
FWIW I was enjoying green flag's contributions but bans are permanent so while mere sockpuppetry might not result in an immediate ban, rejoining after...
March 31, 2023 at 21:10