If there is a Truth, it is objective and completely free from opinion
If a fundamental Truth exists I imagine it has to do with the way matter and energy have been created, or – if always existed – how and mostly why is there something rather than nothing. Or if matter exists in reality as we perceive it. In one way or another the Truth is non-human and never can be accessible to us (always as I see the whole …matter!).
Of course there are “minor truths” here and there that humans can – often partly – obtain. Newton’s laws has served – and serves – us well, though we now know that they are only a fraction of the “cosmological Truth”. In conclusion, if there is a Truth, it cannot be other than objective, because no intelligent agent can have access within “It” in order to express a subjective opinion about “It”. https://philosophience.wordpress.com/2020/10/03/contemplations-iii-objective-and-inaccessable/
Of course there are “minor truths” here and there that humans can – often partly – obtain. Newton’s laws has served – and serves – us well, though we now know that they are only a fraction of the “cosmological Truth”. In conclusion, if there is a Truth, it cannot be other than objective, because no intelligent agent can have access within “It” in order to express a subjective opinion about “It”. https://philosophience.wordpress.com/2020/10/03/contemplations-iii-objective-and-inaccessable/
Comments (19)
That's why I consider most all aspects of reality circumstance and little more. Essentially that reality is dynamic and things can and do change not just in perspective and understanding ie. the idea of the Sun revolving around the Earth (at no point was this an actuality however by all observable understanding it did and everyone thought so) but also in large fundamental changes like in the previous example about gravity or if the Earth has a polar shift or something major that effects everything we think we know about something.
Curious as to your thoughts. Fact vs. truth vs. Truth vs. reality vs. circumstance, etc?
What sort of things can be true and what makes them so?
Definitely should have an admin shorten his username to the first word. Just looks spammy. Could easily post excerpts for discussion without leading to an external site.
The 'something' is not optional, for there is something, plus 'nothing' cannot even be meant.
What is objective is what is common to all; if its degrees can vary across individuals then that aspect of it is subjective.
Then the fact is not that Earth's magnetism is unchangable but that it has the potential to change or be reversed. This is the fact. Science can not get the 100% of things but is a method that help us come as close as it gets.
Good topic, You are saying that if a fundamental truth exists, it must be objective. lets test this.
RNA and DNA is the fundamental information creating life.
It is a fundamental truth. Probably not what you were expecting, but relevant to the topic as this fundamental information effects all subsequent information following it.
Is it objective, or is it biased?
A bias is an aversion to be one way, and an attraction to be the opposite way. It is a very basic emotion.
In science a bias is a systemic error.
Wouldn't a truth be in words? Just as a falsehood is.
I think , the truth initially exists as information that is interpreted and then put into words.
The question is whether DNA is biased? I suppose you would ask in relation to what? It doesn't really matter what, proof of any sort of bias would do, but I was particularly wondering in relation to the questing of live or die?
Looking at the world around me, It seems DNA is overwhelmingly biased to live.
A counter argument would be that it dose not have this choice, It was entirely determined due to external forces, in which case it is still biased, but due to external forces.
Either way it seems biased. What do you think?
A bias is not objective or reasonable information, it is affective or emotional information. Or it could be argued that it is objective and reasonable to make DNA biased to strengthen its fitness for survival.
All roads seem to lead to biased, or am I missing something?
If truth you're after
Doubt you must beat
Descarte the rafter
Cogito the only truth we'll ever meet
In the ocean of ignorance thereafter
rest awhile, take a seat.
We needn't argue. I'm just throwing in an idea you do not seem to have considered.