You are viewing the historical archive of The Philosophy Forum.
For current discussions, visit the live forum.
Go to live forum

Deleteduserrc

Comments

It's awesome all those mathematics books are available. In my opinion, tho, with the very rare exception of natural geniuses, math more complex than c...
January 02, 2016 at 06:06
New Star Wars is a great, well-constructed (edited, photographed, acted, written) movie. A million times better than the prequels. But, narratively an...
January 02, 2016 at 06:02
The subtext here is I think Brassier is being more than a little disingenuous. The cerebral contortions of his dissertation (which I'll admit I haven'...
January 02, 2016 at 05:26
If it's a slam dunk argument, it wouldn't be a burden. It'd be a stop sign. To call it a burden is already to implicitly acknowledge it as a provocati...
January 02, 2016 at 04:55
I sympathize with much of what you've said. I feel like I have a lot I want to add, but I'll wait until I have the time to start a new thread.
January 02, 2016 at 03:18
I have some sort of mental something. Been diagnosed w/ a handful of different things: bipolar, ocd w/ depression, borderline personality disorder, ps...
January 02, 2016 at 02:22
@"The Great Whatever" I can't say I've studied Berkeley much, but I have the bare acquaintance necessary to recognize Stove's account as smug confusio...
January 02, 2016 at 00:45
Worth noting, I think, that Brassier's characterization of the gem changes as the paper progresses. (A)From paragraph 32: ". Berkeley’s premise is a t...
January 01, 2016 at 03:57
In: Genius  — view comment
Of course, tgw, it all comes down to pleasure so it really doesn't matter who's a genuine genius and who's not. The genius and the family-pleasing dop...
December 29, 2015 at 07:17
Hey guys pretty late to this convo BUT, I don't know, it seems clear to me that the force of Berkeley's argument has less to do with stupid "you're th...
December 29, 2015 at 06:38