Shawn

Awesome deal. Bru.

That's sick bro. Hope it works out for ya. Bro, free wine included also?

What job bro? Hope a good one, brosophicus.

Bro, I am so bummed right now. I don't know what to say. The poverty is so unbrotherly right now...

Bro, that was brosophiny brolequent. I bronot compare.

Brudda, I have no money for beer. The butthurtness is unbelievable!

Yah, brosophicus...

I'm a solipsist! AMA

If I were a solipsist, yes.

All three, although #2 isn't me redefining solipsism, I think.

I'm still not getting the discrepancy between what and that statements for a solipsist. In my mind, they are both the same for a solipsist...

What do you mean by that? I read the thread; but, in my opinion differences between that and what get muddy when confronted with solipsism due to the ...

So, you're saying that the belief that I am a solipsism, is open for doubt? Again, that's not solipsism. I must be certain that everything I believe i...

Well, if a solipsist doubts that they are the only self, then that's no longer solipsism, yes?

It's discrimination, I tell you.

You can't have your cake and eat it too. Just save some for later. :halo:

So be it. You can't have your cake and ice cream too.

Madness!

Cheesecake!!!

:flower:

:love:

Cheese!

Cheese!

Oh, nothing much, been preoccupied with the Tractatus thread. Been doing some deep thinking on myself also.

I have no clue what's going on here. :lol:

Yeah, I leave it to Banno to clarify the issue.

This is from the Morris companion:

Let me know if the following helps a little: https://philosophy.stackexchange.com/questions/33878/what-is-the-difference-between-propositional-sign-an...

Dubya, did play the idiot card pretty often; but, boy is Donald killing it.

Yeah, this I agree with. Yes, they complement one another. What isn't said is said through what can be said. Kinda tautologous. Please clarify. Thank ...

So, as promised, I'm returning to this post. Yet, I'm not entirely sure what the question is. If you could possibly specify further what you are askin...

No, but seriously, please report posts more often, and if possible can we add a disclaimer as to what specifically is being reported, to ease the live...

Boaty McBoatface, my distant cousin, is sailing the seven seas. Everyone wish him well.

Well, I still encourage the draft thread to be utilized. In practice, it would indeed be too burdensome on any team of moderators to sort out through ...

Yes, I think that was the intent, but got carried away with targeting a harmless sheep that psychology is.

Take: 2.1513 According to this view the depicting relation which makes it a picture, also belongs to the picture. 2.172 The picture, however, cannot d...

I'll get back to you on that.

I'm not quite sure; but, I have the feeling that Wittgenstein deviated from Frege and Russell. I don't think there is much isomorphism due to not asso...

This could use some expanding on. What do you think?

Well, going back to 1.1, The world is the totality of facts, not of things. So, no. Pictures don't represent things, but facts. About sense, I'm not q...

To answer this better here is a passage from the companion I'm using, which should clarify the issue:

I hope this clarifies the issues we've been having about states of affaris and atomic facts, @"Srap Tasmaner" https://i.imgur.com/p0xaYfr.png

I'm going to upload the companion I'm using, which is excellent. Anyone else welcome to refer to it too, as we go along. Any other companions welcome.

So, the Roman Catholic Church has lost it's mojo or what? :lol:

I'm in agreement here. I just wanted to highlight that there is no infinite regress here, which presupposes substance in the form of atomic facts comp...

Sorry for being ambiguous. I meant to affirm the former you're talking about.

As far as I understand, Wittgenstein uses the terms existent and non-existent, so we might want to stick with that; but, yes-I think so.

Cool!

Thanks for the insightful comment. I really like the Buddhist slant, though, that wasn't my intention in posting the OP. But, I guess it can make sens...

What do you mean by that last part? I'm unsure.