You are viewing the historical archive of The Philosophy Forum.
For current discussions, visit the live forum.
Go to live forum

Deleted User

Comments

Maybe I didn't clarify that enough. As I said, all the folk expressions (as the churchland's call them) will eventually be just empty descriptors. Lik...
May 19, 2022 at 23:08
I encourage him to school me. "Saying I can break down (analyze) mental phenomena into biological processes isn't the same as saying I can build (synt...
May 19, 2022 at 11:15
Fantastic....and very interesting. Holonomic...that's a new one.
May 19, 2022 at 10:55
Isaac - I agree Wayfarer is attributing claims to the Churchland's that they aren't making. If he read their actually writings, they believe conscious...
May 19, 2022 at 10:45
Sorry Wayfarer but I have to agree with your critics.
May 19, 2022 at 10:30
Went out for a bit and came back to all these comments, I wasn't expecting this. Remember the last time I tried this topic I was told I'd be eaten for...
May 19, 2022 at 10:25
The point is if your kid asks how that instrument (sax) works, you can explain it. By that logic there's no point in explaining the mechanics behind a...
May 19, 2022 at 05:59
I couldn't agree more. Just as some people still don't accept evolution, quantum entanglement and there's a growing movement of "flat earthers." No jo...
May 19, 2022 at 05:54
". How about grammar? Syntax? Semantics? Do you think they will be explained in terms of neuroscience?" Why not? And qualia and quale have been used b...
May 19, 2022 at 05:41
describing a Beethoven piece as a "variation of wave pressure" is correct right? It's just a different way of describing the same phenomenon. But when...
May 19, 2022 at 05:31
"We" are just pretending? Who is we. And what does "neuroscience explanation is unable to meet our subjectvity" mean? ....
May 19, 2022 at 05:24
In: Colour  — view comment
Fair enough cuthbert - thanks for replying. I’m not being belligerent, and I’ll go back and read some more Wittgenstein and get back to you. But I sai...
March 20, 2022 at 12:17
In: Colour  — view comment
Are you familiar with Wittgenstein’s argument Re: colour?
March 20, 2022 at 12:11
In: Colour  — view comment
I found an essay that sums it up like this: "Wittgenstein seems to be more equivocal when it comes to propositions like ‘There cannot be a transparent...
March 20, 2022 at 02:27
In: Colour  — view comment
I've made this analogy before but again - if I said "beautiful bright yellow sun in the sky, and gorgeous blue sky" would it make sense if you saw bro...
March 20, 2022 at 02:15
In: Colour  — view comment
Colour blindness is not the issue. If you're colour blind you know objectively that you're seeing colours differently from a non-colour blind person. ...
March 20, 2022 at 02:08
In: Colour  — view comment
"There is not necessarily a clash here. We know the wavelength of light is how colors are seen. We know the eye takes in colors and the brain interpre...
March 20, 2022 at 02:03
In: Colour  — view comment
This is exactly my point though. If you see what I call "yellow" as grey - as when the sky is cloudy it's hard to imagine it appearing to you as cheer...
March 20, 2022 at 01:57
In: Colour  — view comment
We seem to be slipping into a discussion of whether there is an objective reality. I'm an empiricist - but that's not what I'm arguing re: colours.
March 14, 2022 at 10:19
In: Colour  — view comment
Thanks for the response, and no, I definitely don't want to go up against Wittgenstein. Colour blindness is due to a fault in CERTAIN humans, and it c...
March 14, 2022 at 10:16
Agreed. Again, my question was "why say something bad instead of something good when cloaked with anonymity?" And my personal belief is human behaviou...
February 20, 2021 at 11:11
I've had far more nasty things thrown at me than “But you’re still wrong haha!” (the "haha" put there to clearly show I'm teasing, it also followed me...
February 20, 2021 at 11:01
What is human behavior? Is that some sort of material object? Don't start...haha.
February 20, 2021 at 10:13
Good points, but I just think there's a certain nastiness the net brings out in people, and I'm not sure why, but I think Oliver5 is right that anonym...
February 20, 2021 at 10:11
Hilarious. You're right - we all push people's buttons and I can be passive-aggressive although I HATE admitting it haha. It's hard for me - being soc...
February 20, 2021 at 10:05
Totally agree. I've sometimes wondered if this should change. Should people have to post at least their names (NOT other details) to prevent really se...
February 20, 2021 at 09:33
Thanks for replying
February 20, 2021 at 09:09
I see what you're saying. I definitely wasn't implying I'm better or more calm than anyone else.
February 20, 2021 at 09:04
Maybe check my post to Wayfarer above yours to see that, with the right interlocuter, I can place nice.
February 20, 2021 at 09:02
I'll grant you I can be pointed in my comments. But I'm really not being passive-aggressive, my thought with this post really was to understand the ne...
February 20, 2021 at 08:57
I'll read it, but I've read many others. have you read any Churchland? Wayfarer - my hat goes off to you, if I wore a hat. That was the best summation...
February 20, 2021 at 08:21
I'm seeing why people are so anti-materialist here. They think that materialism denies that consciousness, qualia, feelings et al are either "real" or...
February 20, 2021 at 07:34
Wayfarer - Dead bodies don’t life their arms or anything else so why volitional movement is regarded as being solely material is beyond me. Bodies die...
February 20, 2021 at 07:29
I tried to address a few of those in the thread you started on it. But as far as I can see, the arguments are only ‘air-tight’ because you’re predispo...
February 20, 2021 at 07:25
Could you answer my questions?
February 20, 2021 at 07:06
It's a diverse community, but it feels like I stepped over a forbidden line here, not with you but others.
February 20, 2021 at 07:00
Well I've seen lots of materialists engage in arguments, including Dennet. I definitely agree he's pompous, but his arguments against non-materialism ...
February 20, 2021 at 06:58
Are Dennett and the Churchlands considered the bad guys here? I'm a huge fan of the C's, so if their theory is "pretty atrocious philosophy (if it act...
February 20, 2021 at 06:51
Your description is perfect thanks. Maybe I'm just been on wrong threads. Cheers.
February 20, 2021 at 06:47
First off, I wasn't whining about my own thread. I've seen many many other examples of other pairs of people going after each other. I could give a da...
February 20, 2021 at 06:33
Doesn’t a human life imply that it exist for the sake of something higher than that? This is the supposition I can't understand.
February 20, 2021 at 06:24
Well, I think it depends on a) your situation and b) your expectations. I think if you want life to make you happy, you'll be disappointed. I suffered...
February 20, 2021 at 06:23
I'm quietly enjoying this forum. :smile:
February 20, 2021 at 06:14
I agree. I think philosophy should be about the reality of existence, not dreaming of a better life. It's about truth, not "I wish." My only quibble i...
February 20, 2021 at 01:36
In my philosophy I only have one life, so I'd better get moving on it right now! :wink:
February 20, 2021 at 00:12
I think there's confusion here between the concepts of "find" and "create. Our purpose, to answer the topic question, is to spread our genes, nurture ...
February 20, 2021 at 00:06
And I said that when the baby grows up she/he may not have as much time to do those things. Anyway I feel like I've beaten it to death now, cheers.
February 19, 2021 at 13:23
"Do you notice an awkwardness in your thinking? Awkwardness almost to the the point of an inability to think the words at all?" Nope
February 19, 2021 at 13:15
Doing what?
February 19, 2021 at 13:13