You are viewing the historical archive of The Philosophy Forum.
For current discussions, visit the live forum.
Go to live forum

Michael Ossipoff

Comments

That's the animal's (your) view, perception, of its natural-selection-caused incentivization to get its fingers out of the fire, to avoid damage. What...
July 25, 2017 at 22:14
Andrew4Handel said: . . I replied: . . Wafarer says: . No, Andrew4Handel is entirely correct in that. Science has no account of how experience arises ...
July 25, 2017 at 22:03
This discussion has devolved to repetition, and nothing other than repetition. I suggest that we've all had our say. Hasn't this discussion run its co...
July 25, 2017 at 19:59
Both sides of this question have had their say. Now there's only repetition. I said what I wanted to say. Then you said what you wanted to say. I'd sa...
July 25, 2017 at 19:55
It's just the energy-source, immediate physical origin, and immediate physical reason for for Earth's life. :D Thanks,but I'll take my chances without...
July 25, 2017 at 19:23
Well, maybes there's a difference. You have some plants. You do an experiment on them--an experiment that is unlikely to harm them. But the plants die...
July 25, 2017 at 19:06
Not from a single different star, but rather from materials ejected from a number of supernovae. As I read it, at least, the heavier elements were for...
July 25, 2017 at 19:04
Yes, and they also want to find out details of how the solar-wind is accelerated. Michael Ossipoff
July 25, 2017 at 18:46
Even those people don't remember a previous life. Possibly their remarkably early abilities are consistent wlth attitudes, general approaches to life,...
July 25, 2017 at 18:28
In an earlier post, you'd said: . Philosophy of mind is garbage. …fiction. . What is “the mind”? It’s a figure-of-speech used to describe an aspect of...
July 25, 2017 at 02:27
A few more comments, to answer possible arguments about my suggested reincarnation-mode: . There might be some reluctance to accept that, in a stage o...
July 25, 2017 at 01:13
...or that the same dog must be able to be both a junkyard-guard and a sled-puller. Michael Ossipoff
July 24, 2017 at 18:16
But no one's saying that the same individual can be both a friend and a foe. The proposition is just that, if a fool is a friend, then s/he's a more d...
July 24, 2017 at 18:13
Because we need them to dominate the world. But, aside from that, let me be the first to break the news that the Sun has importance more than just its...
July 24, 2017 at 17:42
Maybe, even probably, the Sun will be unaffected. You could argue that all of the solar-system's matter originated in the Sun anyway, and that the pro...
July 24, 2017 at 17:32
...and their heritable attributes and traits are better represented in the population. Michael Ossipoff
July 24, 2017 at 16:51
Yes, for some inexplicable supernatural, magical reason, individuals that survive long enough to reproduce seem to have more offspring. :D And, for so...
July 24, 2017 at 16:30
I should add that, when I first heard about the probe plan, and the article spoke of skimming the sun, it sounded like a closer approach than 5 solar ...
July 24, 2017 at 06:12
Yes, I was talking about metaphysics. We don't disagree because, as you said, we're talking about different matters. "Me" as fundamental would make a ...
July 24, 2017 at 01:48
So quantum potential is explained if there's Mind. You could say, "There's Mind, the Experiencer, because Reality wouldn't be meaningful to speak of w...
July 24, 2017 at 01:22
I'm not denying that it exists, or asking you to prove that it exists. I'm asking you why the Bohm quantum potential exists. You'll say you don't know...
July 24, 2017 at 00:58
Why is there Bohm's quantum potential? Michael Ossipoff
July 24, 2017 at 00:42
Why are there the quanta that compose the mind, the universe? Michael Ossipoff
July 24, 2017 at 00:28
Well, I asked a simple enough question. I'll repeat it: Why is there the un-embodied holographic universal memory-repository that you believe in? Whic...
July 23, 2017 at 23:49
One more comment: You brought up religion, your belief in a Creator. I answered about religion, basically stating something that i didn't agree with y...
July 23, 2017 at 23:42
But yes, you're right about that. Michael Ossipoff
July 23, 2017 at 23:26
Yes, you already said that, and I answered it. Or are you saying that you also don't understand the question: "Why is there the un-embodied holographi...
July 23, 2017 at 23:24
The difference is that I've told specifically what I find wrong with what you say. ...whereas you just make vague generalizations like the above-quote...
July 23, 2017 at 22:21
Why not? What do you have against superintelligent aliens? (...other than that there probably aren't any.) If you're in love with her, there's no reas...
July 23, 2017 at 22:06
Who were those two people? I haven't heard of them, and I don't know why they killed themseves. ...what their circumstances were. No, suicide isn't im...
July 23, 2017 at 21:06
No, you're saying more than that. According to your belief, no only did the mind start that process of evolution of ever more complex life-forms, but ...
July 23, 2017 at 20:49
So the mind of some one-celled organism decided to make it procreate a more complex organism...in a sequence of organisms whose minds decided to procr...
July 23, 2017 at 19:53
That's a question for any evolution-denier. Michael Ossipoff
July 23, 2017 at 16:53
Alright, Rich, how do you account for there being a human species on the Earth? Morphogenic fields and morphogenic resonance? The out-of-body holograp...
July 23, 2017 at 16:24
I’d said: . . Wayfarer says: . . Forgive me the idiosyncrasy of suggesting that the rejection and avoidance of assumptions and brute-facts is skeptica...
July 22, 2017 at 23:55
Not a chance. People are animals, many lacking the attributes that some idealistically expect in humans, quite unable to live up to what some of us (f...
July 22, 2017 at 19:58
Alright,it's true that the consequences of people believing that everyone is the same "Me" would be a tremendously better societal world. ...quite unr...
July 22, 2017 at 17:58
Thanks for pointing out the possible worst-case-memory-use advantage of FPN. Maybe in the earlier days of computers, such an advantage could have been...
July 22, 2017 at 15:24
Then I'll refer you to my reply to Banno. Maybe you qualify for the benefit of the doubt--in case you really thought that I was referring to Greek Ske...
July 22, 2017 at 01:58
I'll just add that posting "arguments" (either very sloppy, or insincere) like the ones that I've just replied to wastes your time and mine (if I repl...
July 22, 2017 at 01:43
When I coin a usage or a term, or anyone coins a usage or a term,, it means, in the coiner's usage, what the word's coiner chooses it to mean--neither...
July 22, 2017 at 01:32
Differences between Skepticism (I've clarified several times that, by "Skepticism", I refer the metaphysics that I propose, not to Greek Skepticism), ...
July 22, 2017 at 01:20
I defined Skepticism as the name of the metaphysics that I propose, and I explicitly clarified that it isn't the Greek philosophy called Skepticism. N...
July 22, 2017 at 01:05
Sure, metaphysicses aren't the only unprovable propositions. And no doubt all proponents of metaphysicses would like to prove them. I just meant that ...
July 22, 2017 at 00:37
So they don't have different languages and customs? :) In any case, you didn't say why or how that would be relevant, even if true. ...because, of cou...
July 22, 2017 at 00:15
Physics doesn't have bearing on metaphysics ...unless it does in some special case, as described by that author on quantum-mechanics, who said that qu...
July 21, 2017 at 23:59
But maybe some disagreements aren't really substantive, but are really only differences in wording. That can eliminate some philosophical disagreement...
July 21, 2017 at 23:18
Regarding my explanation of reincarnation, in terms of it being consistent with Skepticism, someone could object, "I don't know--that transition from ...
July 21, 2017 at 23:01
You didn't say whose explanation of what you're referring to. Why not at least "mention" whom you're replying to, by clicking "reply" at the bottom of...
July 21, 2017 at 20:31
Basically, you're re-defining the word "Me". Michael Ossipoff
July 21, 2017 at 20:15