You are viewing the historical archive of The Philosophy Forum.
For current discussions, visit the live forum.
Go to live forum

creativesoul

Comments

In: Truth  — view comment
This is rubbish. We need not assume that our thoughts are true. We can often check and know for sure. Chance has nothing at all to do with it. Besides...
February 25, 2020 at 05:09
You're good then... just checkin'. Ya never know what people know... :wink:
February 24, 2020 at 16:29
Without marriage, if either of you dies... they may be more involved than you'd like, and possibly in ways that you'd not imagined they could.
February 24, 2020 at 08:17
An astute reader will note that it's a case of following from your use(s) and showing that it leads to a reductio ad absurdum.
February 24, 2020 at 01:38
:meh:
February 23, 2020 at 20:44
That's radical idealism...
February 23, 2020 at 20:39
It's not. The main arguments against it involve costs, as if it is too expensive to implement. That cost objection fails to consider that it is done a...
February 23, 2020 at 20:14
Eyes do not measure. Anthropomorphism.
February 23, 2020 at 19:18
:meh:
February 23, 2020 at 19:12
I agree. That is not a correct report of what I wrote.
February 23, 2020 at 06:38
I agree. 3+2=5 because we won't let it equal anything else. Numbers are rigid designators. Kripke argued - quite successfully on my view - that names ...
February 23, 2020 at 06:27
Photoreceptors are part of the system used by creatures with color vision capabilities as a means for detecting the reflection and/or emission of ligh...
February 23, 2020 at 06:25
Novels before the author just has no compulsory force whatsoever to me. There's not enough evidence in support of such a claim. All evidence is to the...
February 23, 2020 at 06:14
The number three is a specific mark of our own invention. We use "3" as well as "three" to pick out a specific quantity of individual things. We disco...
February 23, 2020 at 06:05
Moby Dick there too?
February 23, 2020 at 06:01
Discovery is of that which exists in it's entirety prior to it's discovery. Invention is to make something novel by combining pre-existing things in o...
February 23, 2020 at 05:55
You too with the equivocation... :meh:
February 23, 2020 at 05:53
The number three is the name we've attributed to a specified plurality of things... a quantity. Numbers are names for quantities. Predicates are descr...
February 23, 2020 at 05:44
Nah. That's what your account of color is.
February 23, 2020 at 05:41
If that were true then measuring requires only detection, reception, excitation, folding, and/or perception. According to this criterion, it would mak...
February 23, 2020 at 05:35
Looks like predicate logic to me. I could be dead wrong. I do not place an excessive amount of value upon either logic(classical) or predicate logic. ...
February 23, 2020 at 05:20
Please. I've given due attention, and I expect the same in return. Attend to the explanation thereof. Every answer you need from me, at this time, is ...
February 23, 2020 at 04:59
I'm still struggling a little bit here, particularly when I perform a substitution of terms with your proposed referents/definitions for those. You fi...
February 23, 2020 at 03:05
Yeah. I do not place much value upon logical possibility alone.
February 23, 2020 at 02:25
Metamers.
February 22, 2020 at 20:30
When and where there have never been humans, there could not ever have been chairs. That's what existential dependency amounts to on my view... and it...
February 22, 2020 at 20:28
Colors and color vision are not equivalent. I said that what chairs are is not the same as what colors are. The former is existentially dependent upon...
February 22, 2020 at 19:43
Thanks for the reply. I agree that frequency, spectral distribution, and color are not equivalent. So, that is not where my confusion lies, if I am st...
February 22, 2020 at 19:38
Risk what? His best chance to lose on purpose? :lol:
February 22, 2020 at 08:37
Yeah. Someone mentioned plausible deniability. :roll:
February 22, 2020 at 08:36
True propositions express facts. I like it. "Express" may be problematic.
February 22, 2020 at 08:34
Moral people are so regardless of what the law says. All moral people. <-----that's the answer to your question in the OP.
February 22, 2020 at 06:56
That's what makes them all great in their own respects... :wink:
February 22, 2020 at 06:38
It's legal, and Trump has benefitted from both sides of such monetary corruption. He actually publicly bragged about it on a national debate stage in ...
February 22, 2020 at 06:09
We agree that there are colors. Our disagreement got clouded by all the jargon. Upon re-reading, had I understood then what I think I understand now, ...
February 22, 2020 at 06:06
So, it seems that we're not so much in disagreement aside from the claim you made that no other animal sees the frequencies that we call "red" as red....
February 22, 2020 at 05:58
There are true lies however, as a result of a lie being a statement by a speaker who is deliberately misrepresenting his/her belief. Not really ugly, ...
February 22, 2020 at 05:54
Yeah. I reject the notion of false facts. Facts must be true... You're also saying that they are not truth-apt though, and that is throwing me off... ...
February 22, 2020 at 05:48
But street, that all depends upon how we define/use the term "fact". Right?
February 22, 2020 at 03:55
"Fact" is a term that has several different acceptable uses. On pains of coherence, one's manner of talking will be helped or hindered, depending upon...
February 22, 2020 at 03:19
If Trump is the president of choice for Russia, and thus they meddle in order to get what they want, then why on earth would the same country meddle t...
February 22, 2020 at 02:55
Spectra are the light emitted from the crayon. Different animals perceive different spectral distributions - out of the spectra - than us. Some percei...
February 20, 2020 at 17:04
If A=B and A=C then B=C. If crayons are spectral distribution and spectra, then spectra are equal to spectral distribution. That can't be right. Spect...
February 19, 2020 at 06:51
Stating the case - no matter how simply it may be stated - is never cheating. I'll take the time to actually address what you've said here. "The same ...
February 19, 2020 at 05:44
February 19, 2020 at 04:02
Let's talk about what we've both agreed is the problem. I quoted it once. You've mentioned it more than once. Let's talk about it.
February 19, 2020 at 04:01
Rhetoric does not impress me.
February 19, 2020 at 03:59
I'm interested in what's true. Not everything you've said is bullshit.
February 19, 2020 at 03:58
Nice. The cavalry has shown up. :meh: The more the merrier.
February 19, 2020 at 03:34