You are viewing the historical archive of The Philosophy Forum.
For current discussions, visit the live forum.
Go to live forum

creativesoul

Comments

Bedrock belief of the linguistic variety are those which somehow offer ground for others. These can be well reasoned or not. Some of these need no jus...
May 29, 2020 at 05:39
Sam is one of the most patient and kind people I have come across while on forums such as this one. He's interested in basic bedrock belief, of both t...
May 29, 2020 at 05:36
Why new? You've already done the work. :wink:
May 29, 2020 at 05:33
I'm reminded of apo... but noticeably nicer. Brainpharte comes to mind as well.
May 29, 2020 at 05:32
I'm taking it to be the case that I understand you. However, according to you, I need not pay attention to your words in order to do so. Now do you se...
May 29, 2020 at 05:31
All language less belief is not.
May 29, 2020 at 05:27
I'm impressed how you're arguing for the idea that all belief has propositional content without using the terms... until you invoked logical accountin...
May 29, 2020 at 04:32
Hey Sam! Sorry about temporarily hijacking your thread, my friend. Hope this finds you well. :smile: It seems to me that you may be glossing over some...
May 29, 2020 at 02:29
Indeed, you are not.
May 29, 2020 at 02:05
There is no doubt to me that there are certain physiological structures, including but not limited to brain parts, that are required in order for the ...
May 29, 2020 at 01:58
I'm done here. Thanks. :kiss:
May 28, 2020 at 06:44
Stolen cows...
May 28, 2020 at 06:42
I would say that. Does the above hold true regardless?
May 28, 2020 at 06:41
Mad cows...
May 28, 2020 at 06:40
An elucidation upon the earlier "off you go" comment... I thought we were taking account of your cat's belief; what your cat takes to be the case rega...
May 28, 2020 at 06:21
Language less belief is chock full of meaning, and yet devoid of all propositional content. Or... Not all belief is meaningful and/or propositional co...
May 28, 2020 at 06:14
Either a language less creature's belief does not have propositional content or propositions somehow exist prior to language use. I chose the former l...
May 28, 2020 at 06:10
Add the timeline first suggested and all remains well.
May 28, 2020 at 06:08
Off you go...
May 28, 2020 at 06:07
Taking it to be the case that the floor is solid requires paying attention to the floor.
May 28, 2020 at 05:29
The cat does not pay attention to what it's taking to be the case. That's a problem, isn't it?
May 28, 2020 at 05:12
That's what I'm attempted to unpack... or targeting.
May 28, 2020 at 04:58
Maybe this helps??? One cannot take it to be the case that leaves are green without thinking about the color of the leaves. Yet, it seems your positio...
May 28, 2020 at 04:57
Since it seems that you're advocating a physicalist account of belief. What role does the tree play in an individual's belief about the tree? The tree...
May 28, 2020 at 04:36
:rofl: An individual can take it to be the case that the floor is solid without thinking about the floor. That follows from your claims. Are you ok wi...
May 28, 2020 at 04:31
I thought that could easily have counted as a reductio ad absurdum. I'm surprised. I will be even more so if you are still ok with those consequences ...
May 28, 2020 at 03:26
Are you assuring me that you are ok with the consequences I've just set out?
May 28, 2020 at 03:20
I'm not so much as making a point at this time... I'm more involved with trying to understand what each participant here has been saying.
May 28, 2020 at 03:14
Indeed. And such a person would be forced to admit that taking something to be the case does not always require thinking about what is being taken to ...
May 28, 2020 at 03:12
That's not the only alternative.
May 27, 2020 at 16:14
I would agree with saying your cat took that to be the case long ago, and am more than happy to expand upon that line of thought. The correlations wer...
May 27, 2020 at 05:06
Taking something to be the case... The something is always a statement.
May 26, 2020 at 16:12
This critique is spot on. Elemental constituency is what matters here. Belief existed in it's entirety prior to being talked about. Prior to language....
May 26, 2020 at 16:05
Taking it to be the case that this is a sentence of English in a thread about Wittgenstein requires thinking about language use while using it. It is ...
May 26, 2020 at 04:05
Best. The problem you have is shared by me. Translation is not readily forthcoming. That's where we were earlier, and we remain there. I do anyway. St...
May 26, 2020 at 03:23
Better.
May 26, 2020 at 03:16
You know I've good reason(s) supporting this. Thus, you know it's not unsupported. Dogma always is.
May 26, 2020 at 03:14
It's the elemental constituency(the ingredients, so to speak) that matters most when talking about non linguistic and linguistic belief. All belief co...
May 26, 2020 at 01:35
...thought better...
May 26, 2020 at 00:31
Too much philosophy. There are two kinds of belief. Linguistic and non linguistic. That's all it's saying.
May 26, 2020 at 00:25
Hope your procedure has the best possible results... Much of my admiration for you is had in the helpfulness of your participation. You and several ot...
May 25, 2020 at 22:25
Banno's suggestion here to stop treating belief as a thing is spot on. Belief is not a single thing. Belief certainly does not have a spatiotemporal l...
May 25, 2020 at 22:10
Again... I commend that post!!! :smile:
May 25, 2020 at 22:00
While I still admire the clarity in your post, it does not make for much of a valid objection to a differing position, such as my own. I'm actually no...
May 25, 2020 at 21:55
Well done Banno... I could certainly raise issues, but those would be based upon our frameworks. What you've set out here is perfectly in line with yo...
May 25, 2020 at 20:27
The content of the belief(about-ness, I've seen it called).
May 25, 2020 at 19:40
There is no one to one correspondence between particular beliefs and neural pathways/networks.
May 25, 2020 at 19:38
Time machines require language.
May 25, 2020 at 19:32
Weren't many of his most trusted contemporaries proponents of JTB?
May 25, 2020 at 05:30
That's Witt's idea.
May 25, 2020 at 05:18