You are viewing the historical archive of The Philosophy Forum.
For current discussions, visit the live forum.
Go to live forum

creativesoul

Comments

'Appears to have been selected from a range of choices' is not adequate for having been. Being moral as a result of being selected from a range of cho...
December 12, 2017 at 06:45
Where does morality come from? That's the question. Morality, as it is currently defined in academia, is a term used in order to talk about either cur...
December 12, 2017 at 05:25
I think you've missed the point, but maybe not. I may be missing yours. I think we're close, regardless... I'll try explaining it another way. I'm not...
December 12, 2017 at 02:25
It points out that either being moral is wholly determined by what we say it is, or we can get it wrong. If you do not see the significance of that, I...
December 11, 2017 at 16:08
One behaviour(doing A) of group X mutually benefits everyone in group X while harming everyone in group Y. Doing A is not moral. Otherwise, you've jus...
December 11, 2017 at 16:02
That's not precisely what I said. Morality is ruled based. Behaving morally is only to do with following the moral rules. Behaving morally is not mora...
December 11, 2017 at 05:32
Admitting ad hoc isn't compelling you know. X-)
December 10, 2017 at 22:09
That's not what I said, nor does it follow from what I've said. I said that acting morally requires thinking morally. The problem here is clear. Eithe...
December 10, 2017 at 22:08
I'm reminded of Sheryl Crow here... It's not getting what you want, it's wanting what you have...
December 10, 2017 at 20:31
So, to be clear, according to you:One can rape pillage and plunder another group, so long as they do not have an agreement that stops them from doing ...
December 10, 2017 at 20:27
Some laws are immoral. Laws and morality are not equivalent.
December 10, 2017 at 20:23
Rubbish. I can look at the agreement between certain American settlers and certain native American tribes and clearly know that the agreement was mani...
December 10, 2017 at 20:21
Tricking someone into an agreement is immoral. Forcing someone into an agreement is immoral.
December 10, 2017 at 20:15
Two groups of people agree to obtain another groups natural resources. The two groups know the financial value/worth of those resources, but the group...
December 10, 2017 at 20:13
What's at stake here is the difference between being moral and being called so. I'm charging Vagabond with calling Virgil's actions moral and confusin...
December 10, 2017 at 19:41
So, one person can simply do whatever s/he chooses to do to another and it would not be right nor wrong - so long as there is no agreement? Rubbish.
December 10, 2017 at 19:04
Nah. I cannot equate the two. Agreements can be immoral.
December 10, 2017 at 19:00
It's not at all trivial though. Everything we say is semantic, or at least relies on semantics. If following the rules does not require knowing them, ...
December 10, 2017 at 18:26
Didn't you just claim that one can accidentally act morally? If you cannot see how that shows that sentience and choice making isn't required for acti...
December 10, 2017 at 01:44
Oh, but it's not. If Virgil can accidentally act morally then having sentience and/or decision making ability to do what's moral is unnecessary for ac...
December 09, 2017 at 23:40
Animals cannot tell us what's going on inside their minds. In order to do that, there must be shared meaning, a common language. I think we agree on t...
December 09, 2017 at 23:23
It can be. Adopting one's first worldview is not voluntarily done. It's part and parcel of language acquisition, and it comes replete with morality. O...
December 09, 2017 at 19:15
One's first moral code is entirely adopted. That holds good for everyone regardless of individual particulars. Anyone here who denies that?
December 09, 2017 at 19:11
Morality is rule based. That's just the way it is. Look around the world and you'll find that that's the case everywhere. Morality is always about wha...
December 09, 2017 at 19:07
That's just not true on it's face. Everyday facts show otherwise. The position you're arguing for uses the notion of mental ongoings being inaccessibl...
December 09, 2017 at 18:47
So, Jack has true belief but he cannot believe that has has true belief, for he has no language. Language is necessary for thinking about one's own th...
December 09, 2017 at 03:50
We understand another as a direct result of drawing the same or similar enough correlations between language use, what's being talked about, and/or ou...
December 09, 2017 at 03:32
That's odd, because not only do I agree, I'm arguing for the same assertion/conclusion. So we agree that in order for Jack to believe that he has true...
December 09, 2017 at 03:13
Where you take note of the differences, I note the similarity. Mental correlations. The point I'm making is that if true belief is prior to language, ...
December 09, 2017 at 03:09
Interesting point to make, but I find it irrelevant, and based upon dubious presupposition. It presupposes either that common language is necessary fo...
December 09, 2017 at 03:01
Does Jack, your cat, believe that he has true beliefs? I would say that that is not possible for Jack. He does not possess the complexity of thought a...
December 09, 2017 at 02:55
Of course. At least, I think so...
December 09, 2017 at 02:52
Moral codes are not always voluntarily agreed upon. In fact, one's first moral code is entirely adopted. That holds good for everyone regardless of in...
December 08, 2017 at 04:53
We're both grown-ups.
December 08, 2017 at 04:39
If Jack holds true belief, he has formed it by virtue of connecting himself to reality. Right? Either there is true belief without truth, or truth is ...
December 08, 2017 at 04:38
Indeed. The content of which is always about what one considers acceptable and/or unacceptable thought, belief, and/or behaviour. Do you disagree? Thi...
December 08, 2017 at 04:29
You're neglecting the facts of the matter. Morality is rule based. If one follows the rules, s/he is behaving morally. Behaving in a way that does not...
December 07, 2017 at 02:25
You hold that Jack has true belief, right?
December 07, 2017 at 02:18
We most likely agree on much when it concerns statements. As you know, statements are statements of thought and belief. Because true belief is prior t...
December 07, 2017 at 02:12
Holding expectation is possible prior to language. When my cat comes to me expecting treats as a result of hearing the plastic treat bag rustle, she h...
December 05, 2017 at 07:57
What are you talking about Banno? Sometimes what is posited doesn't require our positing it in order for it to exist, as it is, prior to or discovery....
December 05, 2017 at 07:44
Care to tell me what my goal is? X-) The cart before the horse. Meaningful thought and belief does not require metacognition. The rules you've invoked...
December 05, 2017 at 07:26
And yet... you began doing it. What still lies between your twice saying that is my answer. Grown-up? Sigh.
December 05, 2017 at 07:11
December 05, 2017 at 06:24
What are you talking about? A relationship that predates language. That's what correspondence with fact is. Predicates are existentially contingent up...
December 05, 2017 at 06:21
What? Limiting one claim is not equivalent to limiting myself. It is what makes statements true. I didn't say only statements, nor would I
December 05, 2017 at 06:21
Holding expectation is possible prior to language. When my cat comes to me expecting treats as a result of hearing the plastic treat bag rustle, she h...
December 05, 2017 at 06:10
Sometimes what is posited doesn't require our positing it in order for it to exist, as it is, prior to or discovery. Certain relationships are such th...
December 05, 2017 at 05:44
Where do I lose your confidence?
December 05, 2017 at 05:21
I hold no firm expectations regarding this. Thank you. Rest assured, the pleasure's all mine. More bullshit. One cannot tell another's emotional state...
December 04, 2017 at 04:53