You are viewing the historical archive of The Philosophy Forum.
For current discussions, visit the live forum.
Go to live forum

creativesoul

Comments

Meaning is not properly accounted for in such terms. There are external things that become both sign and symbol. There are external things that become...
March 14, 2019 at 05:34
We use language for many things. It is a tool. All tools are extensions of ourselves in some perfectly sensible, and thus rightfully applicable, manne...
March 14, 2019 at 05:19
This is an interesting claim, given that there is no universal syntax, grammar, nor form that all currently spoken and/or otherwise understood languag...
March 13, 2019 at 03:47
Ok. Some markings are from a language. Granted. You say that the text provides information. Sure. You say that the intent of the author may be lost fo...
March 13, 2019 at 03:43
What sorts of things can be meaningful and what makes them so? Language use is meaningful. That covers everything ever spoken, written, and/or otherwi...
March 13, 2019 at 03:29
Huh? :worry:
March 13, 2019 at 03:25
So the current question is what sorts of things can be meaningful and what makes them so? I'm happy to accept each and every notion of "meaning" here....
March 13, 2019 at 03:14
Fine by me.
March 13, 2019 at 03:06
March 13, 2019 at 03:05
You don't really think that para-consistency will work out here do you? :kiss: If you're here as a sparring partner... thanks!
March 13, 2019 at 02:45
Mirror mirror... The existential question was already answered... Which one was not that you want to be?
March 13, 2019 at 02:42
Well my good man... Ya know, it's not like you're being physically restrained against your will, arms and legs securely bound, eyelids propped open by...
March 13, 2019 at 02:10
Which question? I left several unanswered. You and I may find productive(or at least interesting) dialogue concerning "meaning is use". You may be sur...
March 13, 2019 at 02:01
Do you not already know what that means? :yikes: I'd be more than happy to discuss what sorts of things can be meaningful and what makes them so.
March 13, 2019 at 01:58
No. It doesn't. It depends upon what sorts of things can be meaningful and what makes them so. Meaning is prior to language. That which is prior to la...
March 12, 2019 at 15:45
Why would I bother? You've disagreed with several true claims already.
March 12, 2019 at 04:59
You're conflating products of your imagination with my words. More of the same. Red herring. Non-sequitur. Strawman. Etc...
March 12, 2019 at 04:57
Information presupposes meaning. Then all of archeology presupposes that they have meaningful information. I'm refuting the very idea. All you can inf...
March 12, 2019 at 04:52
One is existentially dependent upon the other, but not the other way around.
March 12, 2019 at 04:46
We had this... Followed by this... Red herring. Poisoning the well. Non-sequitur. Unacceptable. Discard. I'm all ears. Show me how you understand my p...
March 12, 2019 at 04:33
I would agree with this in general. What interests me most here is thoroughly unpacking the bit about the interacting with words. It's within what you...
March 12, 2019 at 03:15
Fair enough. Pardon my argumentative posture. I'm proposing that any and all texts written in language that is completely and totally devoid of users ...
March 12, 2019 at 02:51
I suggest you click on my avatar. Click on comments, and take a bit of your precious time to learn about what you are arguing against. It would very f...
March 12, 2019 at 02:14
I knew the difference. I also knew that that difference made no difference. I called it a "false dichotomy" as a result of having no difference that m...
March 12, 2019 at 02:04
Of course, you are still faced with the meaning of your own words in this thread persisting through time as well... Outright denial doesn't make any s...
March 11, 2019 at 15:56
That sort of thinking will impede you. Definitions can be wrong. There is a difference between 'just asserting' a definition and arguing for one. Appa...
March 11, 2019 at 15:54
The bit with you began by you using a false dichotomy between history and pre-history. The general point is that an ancient totally unfamiliar text is...
March 11, 2019 at 15:50
Another aspect of a single text having starkly different meaning... "John, could you close the door on your way out?" That question can have very diff...
March 11, 2019 at 04:19
Meaning does not have a location. To talk of meaning persisting 'anywhere' is wrong minded. That said, the above isn't entirely wrong. The additional ...
March 10, 2019 at 20:39
You've set out a distinction between persistent meaning and the continuity of meaning, whereas the former is unequivocally denied. That outright denia...
March 10, 2019 at 20:24
Lack of clarity? It's a text. Texts are in language. Languages are meaningful to their users. Ancient texts were meaningful to their users. How much c...
March 10, 2019 at 04:56
You gave two choices. Those were contained within quotation marks. I said neither.
March 10, 2019 at 04:49
The last point was well made and well taken.
March 10, 2019 at 04:48
I readily grant that it was meaningful to it's users.
March 10, 2019 at 04:47
To start a line of thinking with "either way" misleads the reader.
March 10, 2019 at 04:43
The term "proposition" does not belong here. My position will show you what's wrong with the notion itself. It will also show you What's Really Going ...
March 10, 2019 at 04:38
My point - once again - is that you are presupposing something to be lost. I do not. I argue for my position. Another point is that you refuse to addr...
March 10, 2019 at 04:17
The author's world does not amount to your misattribution of meaning to his/her words... If one misattributes meaning to an author's words, the author...
March 09, 2019 at 20:47
And yet Latin is still used...
March 09, 2019 at 19:54
You assume that the ancient text is still meaningful despite it's users all having perished. That needs argued for in my book. In yours, evidently not...
March 09, 2019 at 19:47
Reading a text and looking at marks. The difference? Understanding the meaning.
March 09, 2019 at 19:45
I think we can agree that meaning of the same marks, signs, and symbols changes through time and different use. The scare-quotes are no longer necessa...
March 09, 2019 at 19:30
Just because it has not been mentioned, does not mean it hasn't been accounted for.
March 09, 2019 at 18:59
We've been over this already. I gave argument. You ignored it. You offer gratuitous assertions. Reading presupposes understanding the meaning of a tex...
March 09, 2019 at 18:56
And what exactly can be known based upon the marks alone if there are no users of the language?
March 09, 2019 at 18:48
Nice. This touches upon everything I've brought into consideration thus far, and sharpened one aspect in particular; the bit about meaning changing ov...
March 09, 2019 at 18:41
You guessed. You asked about the guess. I answered.
March 09, 2019 at 18:00
I thought you were responding to an excerpt of my writing.
March 09, 2019 at 08:31
The above does not support anything afterwards. I do agree with the above. Not so much with what followed. An ancient text that has no users could be ...
March 09, 2019 at 07:44
Earlier someone mentioned location... I wonder why? Meaning is not the sort of thing that has a spatiotemporal location. Rather, it is a composition o...
March 09, 2019 at 05:33