You are viewing the historical archive of The Philosophy Forum.
For current discussions, visit the live forum.
Go to live forum

Michael

Comments

Still early days. ;)
November 05, 2016 at 16:11
Which chapter are you on?
November 05, 2016 at 15:47
Family Guy's before your time?
November 05, 2016 at 11:54
There are a lot of kinky people out there doing all sorts of stuff that I'd never even dream of.
November 03, 2016 at 14:11
Well, according to this, "According to Ms. Lewinsky: 'e was chewing on a cigar. And then he had the cigar in his hand and he was kind of looking at th...
November 03, 2016 at 13:58
Well, green is greener than brown, so...
November 03, 2016 at 13:05
But... the green grass. Also, I'm OK with some MPs losing their limbs to ensure that the price of Marmite comes back down.
November 03, 2016 at 13:02
The U.S. election system confuses me. Are the Electoral Colleges obliged to vote according the people in their state, or can they vote for whomever th...
November 03, 2016 at 12:56
And the grass is greener on the other side. 8-)
November 03, 2016 at 12:54
Really? I don't. If they had then all you Americans would still be living in Europe. Maybe Trump would be leader of the Conservative party. :-O
November 03, 2016 at 12:10
Still, Parliamentary approval wasn't required under UK law for the Government to deploy military forces in Iraq. The illegality of the war refers to i...
November 03, 2016 at 12:04
Maybe those Native Americans should have erected their own wall and set up their own border control and stopped those "pale Europeans" from colonising...
November 03, 2016 at 12:01
That was different, though. Declaring war is a Royal Prerogative and Parliamentary approval wasn't legally required. So you might be right that an Act...
November 03, 2016 at 11:40
Well, I'd assume they'd vote on an Act of Parliament to trigger Article 50.
November 03, 2016 at 11:28
*cough* Brexit *cough* I also heard he might just be President Clinton.
November 03, 2016 at 11:11
Government loses Article 50 court fight So, Parliament must vote. Queue the appeal and then hopefully the Supreme Court agreeing with the ruling and e...
November 03, 2016 at 10:16
I was thinking about this earlier. Is that what he'd be called? First Man? How Westerosi.
November 03, 2016 at 09:52
Hillary's outrage being hypocritical wouldn't make Trump's claims (and actions, if his claims were honest) less terrible.
November 02, 2016 at 23:19
If he didn't ask first, probably Trump.
November 02, 2016 at 14:40
Heh, I sign up and find out that the only other member (besides you) is also called Michael. Interesting format, by the way. Kind of a cross between a...
November 02, 2016 at 09:35
I ran out of adjectives.
November 01, 2016 at 20:07
I thought they concluded that it wasn't, which is why she wasn't prosecuted. Whether or not these new emails are criminal is yet to be decided. Also, ...
November 01, 2016 at 20:02
Correction: (1) Clinton is a corrupt lying criminal and (2) Trump is a lying misogynistic egocentric criminal buffoon.
November 01, 2016 at 18:54
How are things looking now? I read that ABC's poll has Trump ahead. :-|
November 01, 2016 at 16:48
I see either a red cup or a cat on a mat.
November 01, 2016 at 13:35
England's first hotel is burning down.
October 28, 2016 at 13:17
That's a mirror.
October 28, 2016 at 09:56
The Lounge.
October 27, 2016 at 09:48
You need to understand the distinction between the ontic and the ontological in Heideggerian terminology. To offer a simple explanation from Wikipedia...
October 27, 2016 at 08:08
I suppose that means that various interpretations of quantum mechanics are not scientific?
October 21, 2016 at 12:41
I don't get what you're trying to say here. I casually remarked at the beginning that the word "intention" is misleading giving that it implies consci...
October 20, 2016 at 22:45
Yeah, she says "I take it that this much is essential: Laws of Nature are prescriptive, not merely descriptive, and – even stronger – they are suppose...
October 20, 2016 at 22:37
Well, according to this 7% of those surveyed regretted their vote to leave, which if an accurate representation amounts to 1.2 million.
October 20, 2016 at 22:06
I don't see what's psychological about that. Psychological stuff is all in the head, right, not publicly observable. Another explanation (from Google'...
October 20, 2016 at 22:00
Same could be said about Brexit if it precipitates Scottish independence and Irish reunification.
October 20, 2016 at 21:56
"Behave" isn't a psychological term, so I don't understand this.
October 20, 2016 at 21:51
Why would it give discomfort? I'm smart enough to know that the term "law" when used in the context of physics means something very different to the t...
October 20, 2016 at 21:07
Apparently not.
October 20, 2016 at 20:57
And I think that seeing motivation and purpose and intention in these (non-human) natural events is as mistaken as seeing Divine intervention in an un...
October 20, 2016 at 20:46
Binding in what sense? Legally, no. Maybe the government has a moral obligation to accept it? But then depending on the High Court case (or, rather, t...
October 20, 2016 at 20:43
It's not that it acts a certain way because it is the law. It's just that it acts a certain way. It's not a matter of intention or purpose or any othe...
October 20, 2016 at 20:38
There's currently a court case that seeks to ensure that Brexit requires Parliamentary approval, which will give MPs the option of not passing it. I'd...
October 20, 2016 at 20:31
So what's the thing with the intention? What's the thing with a motivation? God? Mother Nature? Unless you're arguing for some Higher Power or, again,...
October 20, 2016 at 20:27
Well, it looks like they're trying to sell the domain for $50,000.
October 20, 2016 at 15:35
I think you're reading too much into it. When I say that nature doesn't have intentions I'm not saying that human intention is non-natural. I'm just s...
October 20, 2016 at 11:33
I don't really see how. It's a natural propensity for a ball on a hill to roll down it. I don't think that tells us anything about moral behaviour. So...
October 20, 2016 at 10:36
So a better phrasing of your claim would be: "the difference consists in actually knowing the propensities of nature and thus being able to make some ...
October 20, 2016 at 09:43
I think "purpose" is the wrong word to use here. It suggests intention, which nature doesn't have (unless you count us wanting things as nature having...
October 20, 2016 at 09:16
When? All I said is that some people don't use the word "world" to refer to everything that exists, and that you must justify your (since corrected) a...
October 19, 2016 at 12:59
Given that I'm not a moral absolutist/objectivist, I don't believe that there's any absolute/objective standard for me to violate.
October 19, 2016 at 12:23