Well, according to this, "According to Ms. Lewinsky: 'e was chewing on a cigar. And then he had the cigar in his hand and he was kind of looking at th...
The U.S. election system confuses me. Are the Electoral Colleges obliged to vote according the people in their state, or can they vote for whomever th...
Still, Parliamentary approval wasn't required under UK law for the Government to deploy military forces in Iraq. The illegality of the war refers to i...
Maybe those Native Americans should have erected their own wall and set up their own border control and stopped those "pale Europeans" from colonising...
That was different, though. Declaring war is a Royal Prerogative and Parliamentary approval wasn't legally required. So you might be right that an Act...
Government loses Article 50 court fight So, Parliament must vote. Queue the appeal and then hopefully the Supreme Court agreeing with the ruling and e...
Heh, I sign up and find out that the only other member (besides you) is also called Michael. Interesting format, by the way. Kind of a cross between a...
I thought they concluded that it wasn't, which is why she wasn't prosecuted. Whether or not these new emails are criminal is yet to be decided. Also, ...
You need to understand the distinction between the ontic and the ontological in Heideggerian terminology. To offer a simple explanation from Wikipedia...
I don't get what you're trying to say here. I casually remarked at the beginning that the word "intention" is misleading giving that it implies consci...
Yeah, she says "I take it that this much is essential: Laws of Nature are prescriptive, not merely descriptive, and – even stronger – they are suppose...
I don't see what's psychological about that. Psychological stuff is all in the head, right, not publicly observable. Another explanation (from Google'...
Why would it give discomfort? I'm smart enough to know that the term "law" when used in the context of physics means something very different to the t...
And I think that seeing motivation and purpose and intention in these (non-human) natural events is as mistaken as seeing Divine intervention in an un...
Binding in what sense? Legally, no. Maybe the government has a moral obligation to accept it? But then depending on the High Court case (or, rather, t...
It's not that it acts a certain way because it is the law. It's just that it acts a certain way. It's not a matter of intention or purpose or any othe...
There's currently a court case that seeks to ensure that Brexit requires Parliamentary approval, which will give MPs the option of not passing it. I'd...
So what's the thing with the intention? What's the thing with a motivation? God? Mother Nature? Unless you're arguing for some Higher Power or, again,...
I think you're reading too much into it. When I say that nature doesn't have intentions I'm not saying that human intention is non-natural. I'm just s...
I don't really see how. It's a natural propensity for a ball on a hill to roll down it. I don't think that tells us anything about moral behaviour. So...
So a better phrasing of your claim would be: "the difference consists in actually knowing the propensities of nature and thus being able to make some ...
I think "purpose" is the wrong word to use here. It suggests intention, which nature doesn't have (unless you count us wanting things as nature having...
When? All I said is that some people don't use the word "world" to refer to everything that exists, and that you must justify your (since corrected) a...
Comments