Michael

I know.

Open IE, press ALT, then go to Tools > Manage add-ons. On the left there might be a "Spelling Correction" option. Click it and make sure "Enable spell...

That's your problem.

What browser are you using?

"Me and Vlad, drinking smoothies on the veranda. DELICIOUS!".

Donald Trump quits Twitter because he's 'too busy putting America first'

Just worthless.

It's a browser feature, not a feature of the forum, so I assume whatever browser you use on your phone doesn't have a spellchecker.

Vox https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/vox/ Discover the Networks (David Horowitz) https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/discover-the-networks/

Sure. And there are violent extremists who take themselves to be in support of Christianity. But it doesn't then follow that Christianity or the BLM m...

This was my original argument: Assume a lottery of n tickets. P1. Ticket 1 won't win P2. Ticket 2 won't win P3. Ticket 3 won't win ... Pn. Ticket n wo...

Such as? The FBI report that @"Thorongil" referred to only has mention of 6 individuals engaged in "Black Identity Extremism" since 2014, and doesn't ...

And that's the non sequitur. That you might react to "right wing lunatic" isn't evidence that others may regard you as a right wing lunatic. The disti...

I'm not sure how this relates to my point, though.

OK, but I don't know what that has to do with my comment. And I was just pointing out that that part of your defence of your opinion is a non sequitur...

Then what makes the ID example different to the lottery ticket example? We're justified in believing that the ID isn't fake because the probability th...

Then what of my example of someone showing me their ID? If it tells me that they're 18, am I justified in believing that they're 18? Unlike your examp...

This doesn't seem right. If I say something disparaging about "right-wing lunatics" on this forum then you might interpret this as a veiled attack on ...

What does "murderous equity doctrine" even mean?

Of course. We'd have banned you long before that.

Quality over quantity.

The argument is: P1. Ticket 1 won't win P2. Ticket 2 won't win P3. Ticket 3 won't win P4. There are 3 tickets C. No ticket will win (Except with more ...

That wasn't my argument, though. My argument was that if P1 won't win and if P2 won't win and if P3 won't win ... and if Pn won't win then no ticket w...

I disagree with your claim that justification requires certainty, as we discussed earlier. If someone shows me some ID and if the ID shows them to be ...

It does. If for each ticket "this ticket won't win" is true then no ticket will win.

Assuming a lottery of n tickets, the premises are: P1. Ticket 1 won't win P2. Ticket 2 won't win P3. Ticket 3 won't win ... Pn. Ticket n won't win Fro...

It's true that you're not justified in believing that the entire sample of tickets loses, and I think that shows that justification isn't necessarily ...

Yes, sorry. Let's say that 100 people have each picked out a ball. Given the high odds, I am justified in believing that Person 1 doesn't have the bla...

What about when multiple premises are concerned? I am justified in believing a, I am justified in believing b, and c follows from a and b. Am I justif...

P is "Jones will get the job and has 10 coins in his pocket" and Q is "the person who gets the job has 10 coins in his pocket". If P is true then Q is...

Your example doesn't seem at all like a Gettier case. In Gettier cases, the general form is: 1. P is justified 2. P entails Q 3. Q is true 4. P is fal...

That's an increase of 17.14%. I'm no statistician, but I'm pretty sure describing the % change in terms of the absolute difference between two figures...

Here's an interesting graph that shows how the Earth's temperature has changed over time.

Not if Trump is just going to lie about loving me as he did to her.

What happened to parts 4 and 5 of Channel 4's exposé of CA? Seems all mention of them have been removed from their website. The conspiracy theorist in...

Also, Trump considered ousting Kelly and serving as his own chief of staff.

Like John Bolton, which is the problem Saphsin raised.

Pretty sure these things are decided by the commander in chief, i.e. the President. If he orders a strike then it has to be carried out, correct?

In my first post I admitted that how to go about rectifying – if possible – existing contracts is a quandary. My point was that at the very least we s...

It does make a difference. The ethical concern isn't simply with paying one person more than another for the same job but with paying one person more ...

This is a red herring. In the case of there being a gender pay gap, the decision to pay me less (or you more) isn't arbitrary. The decision was made o...

Your arguments ignore the central issue, which is that I was offered a contract with a lower wage because I'm a woman. Discrimination based on sex is ...

Users' comments (i.e. here) and discussions should be paginated. Just having "More comments" to go forward a page is annoying,

It isn't reasonable for me to hold that belief, but it's still reasonable for him to hold that belief. A belief is justified if it would be reasonable...

We've had good discussions here, too. I've just had to painstakingly split the comments off elsewhere.

I like to slack at work (case in point; this). I just don't like Slack.

I sometimes use it for work. I prefer email.

If the truth is exposed to us but not to him then his belief is still justified. Given the evidence available him, it is reasonable for him to believe...

But seriously, if you're reading the Grand Design to get a history lesson on philosophy then you're doing it wrong.

Last night I was reading the Bible. I could not read more than 1 page, and after that, I threw the book out the window. When it started saying things ...