Michael

It must be a summary. It's way too short for the proper assessment. Interestingly a senior editor of the Sunday Times said she received a copy of this...

The government have published the Yellowhammer docs. Government response to Humble Address Motion Some important bits (will update as I read them): Th...

No, the government's prosecutors accuse him of it in their sentencing of Cohen. That memorandum is written by SDNY.

The government's sentencing memorandum explicitly says that Individual-1 (who "began an ultimately successful campaign for President of the United Sta...

THE GOVERNMENT’S SENTENCING MEMORANDUM

To start, he's an unindicted co-conspirator in the charges against Michael Cohen for campaign finance law violations.

I both love and hate your non-standard rotation. One criticism though; the buses are missing the "£350 million" sign.

The actual ruling does spell it as "stymie", although "stymy" is valid too.

Parliament should have just voted to overrule it (prorogation, that is).

Parliament suspension ruled 'unlawful' Will probably be appealed to the Supreme Court of the United Kingdom.

These people see Trump’s policies as terrible for the country so believe that him “succeeding” would ruin the country, just as I’m sure many Trump sup...

I have, but I actually put up a shrubbery.

France to insist on a ‘two-year’ extension to allow Brexit re-evaluation Ha. I knew Macron would be difficult.

No, they made a mistake which they then admitted to and promptly fixed. That's not fake news. Fake news is Trump using a sharpie to doctor an official...

That's not spin; that's the story. Trump was wrong in saying that Alabama was likely to be hit harder than expected and then tried to defend his mista...

It's a warranted presupposition. There's no reason to believe that it won't receive Royal Assent. It's passed both Houses. It's also by the same reaso...

The context is that Trump tweeted on Sunday that Alabama would most likely be hit much harder than anticipated, the National Weather Service corrected...

No, I'm presupposing that the bill will receive Royal Assent because it's passed both Houses.

I was referring specifically to the sentence that states Royal Assent to be a formality. It's passed both Houses and so will receive Royal Assent and ...

There will be.

https://www.abc.net.au/news/image/11480614-3x2-940x627.jpg Here's the map that Trump was using. You can clearly see that he used a sharpie to alter it...

The Clerk of the Crown prepares letters patent listing all bills passed by Parliament which are then signed by the Royal Commission.

It's expected to be law on Monday. It's passed the Houses and is awaiting Royal Assent.

European Union (Withdrawal) (No. 6) Bill (HL Bill 202)

NOAA’s support of Trump over its own scientists provokes uproar in weather community And the President did in fact use a sharpie to alter the official...

Uh, what? Where did that come from?

. The Troubles are fake news clearly.

Yes, the same Lib Dems who opposed Labour's war in Iraq.

Now Amber Rudd's gone. The Conservative party is falling apart. Nice.

Drawing rings around them.

Of course it is. Parliament can vote to revoke article 50.

It's pretty straightforward. She believes that the best option is to remain, the second best option is to leave with a deal, and that the worst option...

The EU Court has already ruled on this: “The revocation must be decided following a democratic process in accordance with national constitutional requ...

That's already happened; Parliament voting to grant Theresa May authority to invoke article 50. It's only revoked if the UK writes to the EU to notify...

The new law will require Boris to request an extension. The EU might not grant one. Macron almost didn’t last time, and since then there hasn’t been a...

He's rather be dead in a ditch but apparently not rather resign.

That’s what we do with General Elections.

Why not? We’re currently having a GE every other year. The people’s will is always changing. If anything it’s undemocratic to ignore it.

So to summarise, if the majority today are in favour of remaining then the will of the people is to remain, and it is perfectly proper and consistent ...

Undoing a previous vote with a subsequent vote is how democracy works. The will of the people is whatever the will of the people is now, not what it w...

Having a vote is never undemocratic.

And as I’ve explained the will of the people to leave is meaningless if there are incompatible means of leaving. The will of the people might not be t...

So which leave group should we accept as the will of the people, and why that one?

And in 2017 we voted on who to implement Brexit. So that general will must be accepted, right?

Except the leave campaign ruled out leaving without a deal. From the Vote Leave manifesto:

If after 2 years the people ought be allowed to redecide how Brexit is to be implemented then after 3 years the people ought be allowed to redecide wh...

The people decided in the 2017 General Election who they wanted to implement Brexit (according to your logic).

If 48% want to remain, 27% want to leave without a deal, and 25% want to leave with a deal, then what is the will of the people? To leave? That’s pret...

Then neither is an early General Election on the issue of Brexit - although again, a General Election will never just be about Brexit. So if you are s...