Michael

Or get Huel. It's pretty much 80% of my diet now. Cheap, nutritious, tasty, quick, and convenient.

A small semantic point, but you should be using the term "sexual behaviour", not "sexual orientation".

According to Schiff, Trump didn't ask Ukraine to find evidence of wrongdoing but to manufacture it (although I'm not clear how he would know this). Th...

It didn't need to mention it because the information it gave – that the motivation was to discredit Trump's campaign – was sufficient to establish bia...

It says that the motive of the research was to discredit Candidate #1’s campaign. That’s sufficient information for the judges to come to a decision o...

Yes it was. Page 16 of the application (if we’re talking about Page). Although it doesn’t name the DNC because it’s standard procedure not to identify...

Seeing how many issues the U.S. has over the Second Amendment, I'm glad we don't have a written Constitution.

The Thick of It and In the Loop. Love 'em.

Not just her. There were 2 cases being discussed and I think one was by a group of MPs.

True, but I hope it gets cancelled. I'd rather watch something less interesting.

11-0. The Supreme Court is unanimous that prorogation is justiciable. 11-0. The Supreme Court is unanimous that this prorogation was unlawful. Parliam...

Would you vote for AV rather than PR?

My current standard is simply that the Inspector General (a Trump appointee no less) considers it credible and of urgent concern (whether criminal or ...

We know they want it investigated. The issue is over why they want it investigated and what they’re doing to push it to happen. If Trump is using taxp...

You have more faith than me.

I didn’t say I don’t know what Trump did wrong. I said I don’t know what law, if any, is broken if the accusations are true. But whatever happened is ...

I don’t know what the crime is, but the Inspector General considers it an urgent concern, and the White House considers it bad enough to order the DNI...

Using $250 million of military aid as leverage to pressure Ukraine into investigating Biden’s son.

If the accusations are true then doing the things he’s been accused of warrants the accusations.

There’s enough there to know that this isn’t “Dems inventing fake crimes”, so I ask you again to explain the reasoning behind your accusation.

Apparently. There’s an official whistleblower complaint that the Trump-appointed Inspector General believes is credible and of urgent concern and the ...

How is it a Democrat invention?

It wasn’t deleted: https://thephilosophyforum.com/discussion/6681/what-happened-to-my-ignore-list/p1

You'll have to ask @"SophistiCat".

I don't understand trolls. They know what they're saying is bullshit. So they enjoy their opponents correctly calling them out on the rubbish they say...

It’s also responsible for investigating federal crimes. I suspect it was limited in scope because the Republicans who control a majority didn’t want K...

Bit more than just pulling it out. And the point is that the first investigation was hardly an investigation at all.

https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/book-reveals-allegations-brett-kavanaugh-fbis-handling-probe/story?id=65625607

The trick is to look at the references section to see where the information is coming from.

How does that work? An earlier publication referencing a later publication?

You and jamalrob, both in Russia? Have the KGB bought us out? Where's my cut?

Hanover does bring the average down. That's why we hired him. Gotta fill that diversity quota.

I am, and I'm the best of us. :wink:

Nah, they’re shit.

No, because the computer could have removed your guess (if it’s wrong), and so the logic isn’t comparable to the Monty Hall problem.

If we're playing 99 games then in 33 games the car is behind my door, in 33 games the car is behind the door the computer picks, and in 33 games the c...

Actually, you're right. It's 50% for the OP's modified version.

I don't think that's right. There's a 1/2 chance that he picks door 2 and a 1/2 chance that he picks door 3. There's a 1/3 chance that the car is behi...

33 times the car is behind "my door". 33 times the car is behind "other door 1". 33 times the car is behind "other door 2". If I don't switch then I w...

You can win all 99 by switching as well. That's not right. Probability dictates that if we play 99 games then I am likely to pick the correct door 33 ...

Forget about Monty opening a door and just look at the initial selection where I have to pick from doors 1, 2, or 3. If we play 99 games then that fir...

See my post here. You're right that it's no longer 1/3, but it isn't 1/2 either.

There are 3 unnumbered doors. I pick one at random. That door is then numbered "1". The left-most of the remaining doors is numbered "2" and the other...

I've changed my opinion on this after running some simulations. Unless I'm doing it wrong, there's a 43% chance of winning by not switching and a 57% ...

If we play the game 99 times with 3 doors then we'd expect our initial selection to be right 33 times because the car has an equal chance of being beh...

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Monty_Hall_problem /uploads/files/z0/sbyjvafvzk7n9l42.png /uploads/files/xp/rn1bnl13x5r7e5su.png

The admins and moderators were definitely better at the old place.

Still 2/3. The door you chose retains the initial 1/3 chance and the other door must have a 1 - 1/3 chance, i.e. 2/3.

Opinion from the Scottish court: I was right in what I said earlier.

If it's not justiciable then short of a violent rebellion, what stops a malicious government from proroguing Parliament indefinitely? For the sake of ...