You are viewing the historical archive of The Philosophy Forum.
For current discussions, visit the live forum.
Go to live forum

Janus

Comments

I say that religion consists in believing in some kind of transcendent reality, because I can't see how a religion could exist which accepted only the...
May 04, 2023 at 22:52
Interesting point, the Motte and Bailey fallacy could be seen as a kind of reversal insofar as it seems to consist in defending rather than attacking ...
May 04, 2023 at 22:33
The belief in something transcendent is the essence of religion as I would define it. (Note, I draw a distinction between thinking the transcendental ...
May 04, 2023 at 22:26
I think the need to believe in something transcendant can only be satisfied by religion, and I think that need is inexplicably there in some people an...
May 04, 2023 at 05:28
I think the drug analogy is weak. Religion is not an addiction, but a way of life, the need for religion is not like the need for a drug, and a religi...
May 04, 2023 at 03:39
As long as the need for religion is felt, humanity will not be better off without it. I doubt that need is going to disappear.
May 04, 2023 at 02:51
:up: Yep, I don't believe religion is going away any time soon. And I also don't hold the view that humanity would be better off without it.
May 03, 2023 at 07:29
:up:
May 03, 2023 at 06:50
Control is the basic point of any ideology including religious ideology; and that's why I questioned whether you hold an ideological view that recomme...
May 03, 2023 at 06:49
Yes, and we have even less intuitive sense of what a field is. I agree, with the caveat that what can be known phenomenologically is not coterminous w...
May 03, 2023 at 06:44
:up: Thanks for linking this.
May 03, 2023 at 02:24
I think this is right; we have a commonsense picture of matter, and a scientific notion of its equivalence with energy, and related formulations of in...
May 03, 2023 at 01:35
Is it a scientific view that makes it look puzzling, or just the commonsense view of matter as being "inanimate", not to mention insentient and insapi...
May 03, 2023 at 01:28
Well, you could make it illegal I suppose, or brainwash people against religion from childhood. Might not be totally effective, but would no doubt vas...
May 02, 2023 at 04:37
I wasn't talking about killing people.
May 01, 2023 at 20:24
That may be one interpretation: the one I am familiar with is that eternalism posits an immortal self, with nihilism being the idea that there is no s...
May 01, 2023 at 02:48
What if it won't die? Kill it?
May 01, 2023 at 01:11
As I understand it, Gautama eschewed identification with what is permanent as much as identification with what passes away. In other words,, he reject...
May 01, 2023 at 00:11
Right, I first used the word 'blindness' but it was in response to what seemed to be implied in what you refer to above as "popular rejection", as tho...
April 30, 2023 at 23:59
I agree that there could have been (probably mostly covert) willful rejection of Christian dogma, but I would not call that "blindness" because in my ...
April 30, 2023 at 23:21
Science cannot solve all the problems inherent in the human condition. Organized religion is an attempt to pacify, if not solve, those kinds of proble...
April 30, 2023 at 22:56
For me that way of framing it is tendentious. The Christian worldview held sway for a very long time, and its only guarantor was the voice of unimpeac...
April 30, 2023 at 22:43
:up: Very nicely laid out!
April 30, 2023 at 22:21
Whether consciousness can be explained in terms of physical processes is a different question than whether it or the physical (or neither) is ontologi...
April 29, 2023 at 23:44
Would you count seeing something as something as a kind of conceptualization? The ball stands out for the dog; it's a gestalt. This is cognition and r...
April 29, 2023 at 23:35
Yes, I understand that the Tractatus priveleges one usage over another, but that doesn't change the fact that there are different usages. It is an amb...
April 27, 2023 at 00:00
Interesting post! :up:
April 26, 2023 at 07:23
As I understand it the term 'fact' refers ambiguously to both actual states of affairs, and statements describing states of affairs. It is in the latt...
April 26, 2023 at 05:14
Not quite, I'm saying that if a proposition is to be counted as a fact then it is necessarily true. That still sounds a little ambiguous, because it m...
April 26, 2023 at 03:34
I agree with you that whether or not we ascribe reasoning to animals will depend on how we define 'reasoning'.
April 25, 2023 at 23:08
You are thinking of 'fact' as equivalent to 'actuality'. In a different sense, the encyclopedia is a compendium of facts, or true propositions and des...
April 25, 2023 at 23:02
You seem to be pointing out that the fact is concrete whereas the proposition is abstract. The baby crying is a concrete fact. The term 'fact'; is amb...
April 25, 2023 at 22:00
Thanks for your explanation, unfortunately I don't have the background to properly understand what you're saying, so I cannot form a judgement of its ...
April 25, 2023 at 21:50
I agree and I wasn't thinking about propositional logic but logic in the broader sense of semantic relations or structure. I'd agree with this, with t...
April 25, 2023 at 07:04
I know little about computers, but on the face of it seems to me that, even if the CPU maps inputs to outputs in the same way whatever program it is r...
April 25, 2023 at 07:01
I have no doubt that some kinds of animals have a capacity to reason, and I don't believe that reasoning is necessarily carried out, even by humans, i...
April 25, 2023 at 06:59
Are you drawing a distinction between being context driven and being context dependent, or are you simply contradicting yourself? I would agree with y...
April 25, 2023 at 06:49
:up:
April 25, 2023 at 06:43
So, are you suggesting that there is an additional component to rational thought, a purely semantic aspect, that is enabled by, but is not itself dete...
April 24, 2023 at 07:03
If you are to ask where these states are located then where else but the body? I mean they are your states, and where else are you but with your body?...
April 24, 2023 at 03:20
The issue here is that animals also seem to have inductive expectations. So maybe what we think of as inductive reasoning consists in rationalising ou...
April 24, 2023 at 02:28
I agree, but I don't think inductive reasoning involves any deductive certainty, or necessity.
April 24, 2023 at 01:34
The kind of expectation that things in the future will be as things have been in the past does seem to be instinctive in animals as well as humans. Th...
April 24, 2023 at 01:20
Inductive reasoning is really just custom and habitual expectation at work according to Hume.
April 23, 2023 at 04:35
There is a kind of logic that even (at least some) animals are capable of that is quasi-deductive: for example if something is solid I will not be abl...
April 22, 2023 at 23:27
In the head (so obvious I couldn't resist) :wink:
April 22, 2023 at 04:39
If you accept that all those vivid mental states are underpinned by neuronal processes and neuronal processes are in the brain or brain/body, then I g...
April 21, 2023 at 04:50
Neuronal processes are in the brain, just as digestion is in the body. That said neuronal porcesses are not just in the brain apparently: It doesn't s...
April 21, 2023 at 04:08
:up:
April 21, 2023 at 03:54