You are viewing the historical archive of The Philosophy Forum.
For current discussions, visit the live forum.
Go to live forum

Janus

Comments

In: Mysticism  — view comment
Yes, via the incarnation He was transformed from a great distant authority, or a broker of covenants, into the loving father who manifested the spirit...
September 22, 2016 at 02:39
I know, but i felt like taking it seriously, just for fun ;) If Heidegger thinks that makes Being (a word that is capitalized only on account that all...
September 22, 2016 at 02:13
In: Mysticism  — view comment
Yes, the fossilization of the arch-conservatives! 8-)
September 22, 2016 at 01:37
It seems to me that the belief or intuition that life continues beyond this life, and that events here have a significance that cannot be expressed wh...
September 22, 2016 at 01:26
Change is experienced, and movement is one aspect of, and/or way of conceiving of, change. So it would not seem reasonable to say that movement is not...
September 22, 2016 at 01:06
In: Mysticism  — view comment
OK, having said that I don't want to indulge in slanging matches; I'll try to address what you write here, without doing that. It's true that I have c...
September 22, 2016 at 00:50
You didn't bite on my previous response, so I'll elaborate. The capitalization of letters usually indicates that there is a notion of hierarchy at wor...
September 21, 2016 at 23:27
In: Mysticism  — view comment
Dali; now there's a connection I never would have thought of!
September 21, 2016 at 19:50
In: Mysticism  — view comment
The reason I find much of what you say repugnant is because it seems to be hopelessly mired in politics. The result is that you come across to me as b...
September 21, 2016 at 19:48
In: Mysticism  — view comment
I'm sorry to say it Agustino, but I find most of what you say highly disagreeable, even repugnant. I cannot see anything in it that persuades me you w...
September 21, 2016 at 19:13
Can he see them, you know, being dead and all? Why would I care in any case? Being is the being of beings, so how transcendent? No, the dialectical po...
September 21, 2016 at 09:36
It makes the letter look bigger.
September 21, 2016 at 08:58
I would say there's faith and then there's Faith; if it can be misplaced then it is not Faith but merely faith.
September 21, 2016 at 08:55
In: Mysticism  — view comment
I love Whitman. For some reason when I read these poems now (which I have read previously several times too) I was reminded of a poem I wrote five or ...
September 21, 2016 at 08:52
Pure supposition on your part.
September 21, 2016 at 07:09
I don't think it makes sense to speak about the passing of time between moments, and no passing of time within the moment, rather passing of time is a...
September 21, 2016 at 04:48
In: Mysticism  — view comment
Perhaps that's true; I don't know. I think it is probably more the 'slow insidious creep' of determinism which is undermining belief in free will and ...
September 21, 2016 at 02:17
In: Mysticism  — view comment
True, I think Jesus does call for repentance, but if the woman went and sinned again, he still would not judge, but patiently urge repentance again. R...
September 21, 2016 at 01:30
In: Mysticism  — view comment
I haven't said that he declared any of his writings to be wrong, but merely inaccurate, in the sense that there can be no accurate description of the ...
September 21, 2016 at 01:15
In: Mysticism  — view comment
I'm still not clear as to what it is you find unseemly.
September 21, 2016 at 00:17
In: Mysticism  — view comment
Right, so what do you want to say is the sgnificance of that?
September 20, 2016 at 23:18
In: Mysticism  — view comment
I think it is far more likely that he came to think that it was not an accurate description of the reality of God, as that was revealed to him by his ...
September 20, 2016 at 22:42
No, C is the claim that what we perceive and think about it is equivalent to what we can perceive and think about it. This, if true, (which you have n...
September 20, 2016 at 22:04
Because C is the claim that A and B are equivalent, and although you now say you agree with it, earlier you claimed that when I expressed myself first...
September 20, 2016 at 21:24
How could you know that something could not be possessed by something else if you don't know what the "something" is?
September 20, 2016 at 08:36
In: Mysticism  — view comment
I can't see a difference that makes a difference between the idea of becoming God and becoming one with God. The idea of apotheosis may be aligned wit...
September 20, 2016 at 01:08
Apropos this, Wittgenstein: "Don't for heaven's sake, be afraid of talking nonsense! But you must pay attention to your nonsense."
September 20, 2016 at 00:28
In: Mysticism  — view comment
For me this is an extremely facile point, There are many things which can be "experienced and encountered" for example, love, truth, beauty, hope, fai...
September 20, 2016 at 00:21
In: Mysticism  — view comment
Maybe he would have come to see God as an absolute immanence, and thus to have come to think that his writings about the transcendence of God were "as...
September 20, 2016 at 00:15
I would agree, obviously, that forms are immanent, but not that any forms have objects in this world; they are objects, or modes of being, in this wor...
September 20, 2016 at 00:05
In: Mysticism  — view comment
Can you name some of the mystics you are referring to here? If St Thomas cast aside the Summa on the basis of a mystical experience, then we may concl...
September 19, 2016 at 23:37
For me, you are performing an incoherent separation here. "Meaning, love, hope, value" are not in things in the sense of "being contained' by them, bu...
September 19, 2016 at 23:31
But that is not the point. I don't care whether you agree with claims A and B. You claimed that they were not the same, i.e. that claim C is not corre...
September 19, 2016 at 23:18
In: Mysticism  — view comment
Voegelin, if I remember right, believes that the transcendent God cannot be known, which is contra the Gnostics and the whole Hermetic and Theosophica...
September 19, 2016 at 23:13
In: Mysticism  — view comment
I haven't read much of Eliade; but I have read quite a bit of, and about, Voegelin several years ago now. I don't agree with his characterization of H...
September 19, 2016 at 22:52
But, you were claiming earlier that I had changed what I was saying. Of course, since we have come, historically to perceive and think about more and ...
September 19, 2016 at 22:44
I would say that what we perceive and think about it just is what we can perceive and think about. And of course scientific instrumemts are either dir...
September 19, 2016 at 21:57
I think you identify as a realist, so tell me what kind of reality you think is there apart from the kind we can perceive and think about.
September 19, 2016 at 21:20
In: Mysticism  — view comment
Ha ha, that's a nice story, but I think it just comes down to disposition; people who prefer not to think too much are attracted to Zen instead of Hua...
September 19, 2016 at 07:50
Idealism (subjective at least) proposes that reality is exhaustively constituted by ideas. I haven't said that, nor does anything I have said entail t...
September 19, 2016 at 07:42
"The world presented to us by our perceptions is nothing like reality". This what Hoffman claims. But if our perceptions of the brain are nothing like...
September 19, 2016 at 07:27
I actually really doubt that dogs have to be forced to lick vaginas and/ or to penetrate them. Nonetheless it is disgusting. Why is that; if it is not...
September 19, 2016 at 07:20
I consider myself a realist but I wouldn't claim that colours exist apart from perception; only that (some of) the conditions for perceiving are not t...
September 18, 2016 at 23:16
Yes, I agree, what is considered unlawful is usually only what harms another; but certainly not always. What about fornicating with animals, for examp...
September 18, 2016 at 23:10
I don't know what you mean by "perception independent"; do you?
September 18, 2016 at 23:05
Hegel made this kind of point also in a somewhat different way. Freedom, he said, is impossible without discipline, which is achieved by habituation, ...
September 18, 2016 at 23:04
Yes, of course murder has greater effects on others than gluttony, that is just why it is worse. It also would have greater effects on oneself; and th...
September 18, 2016 at 22:58
Certainly murder is worse than gluttony; I don't think anyone would disagree with that.
September 18, 2016 at 22:49
No, they are just two different aspects, in two different contexts, of what you see. Why must one be 'correct' and the other 'incorrect'?
September 18, 2016 at 22:47
Gluttony may lead to obesity and other severe health problems that place a tremendous burden on those who must care for the obese person; or his famil...
September 18, 2016 at 22:44