I don't think 2 is right because the "craft" of sex, as I see it, is not love. Porn stars could be the greatest craftspeople of sex, but no need for l...
What if each frame persists for a while without change? This is the case with projected moving films. Then the present is not 'dimensionless', but sti...
It's quite possible for people to believe things that are not true. It doesn't make sense to say that we believe something that we do not believe to b...
I agree with this, but I think that what is at issue is how we should talk about the differences between animals and ourselves. That is why I have com...
That's right, it's only a part of knowledge. But is there any belief apart from fallabilistic knowledge? Or to put it another way, don't we say that w...
Yes, that's pretty much just what I have been saying. First is the knowing of familiarity, which builds into knowing-how, which makes possible the ref...
No, I'm just saying that either, as mere models, are coherently thinkable. What is not coherently thinkable is how they or any other model could be th...
I would say that as a mere model, just as its opposite, eliminative materialism it is coherent. It is when either is claimed to be the absolute ontolo...
Yes, I think we generally operate in a space of knowledge rather than belief. This is the working knowledge of familiarity, of knowing-how, not knowle...
But I wasn't making that claim; I was just saying that the alternate views which constitute eliminative materialism (panzombieism or pandeadism) and s...
The dichotomy is in relation to what is thought to be the constituents of reality. So, the alternative scenarios (ignoring dualistic substance ontolog...
Sure, but the dichotomous alternative to panpsychism is panzombieism or pandeadism. It seems a matter of perspective as to whether the material consti...
Well, yes, it could be said the image is 'really' in the eye, or in the visual cortex. So moving around to get different viewpoints is just the same a...
I would say the image is not "in" the mirror, but on the surface of the mirror. If it were "in" the mirror, then it would be as @"unenlightened" says,...
I have no doubt we all protect some attachments or other. The truth and honesty of other's convictions are their affair, not mine, unless they try to ...
Are they really passionately convinced or are they just neurotically protective of beliefs they are attached to for some obscure reason? For me my con...
I'm referring to feeling as it subjectively seems to us. I'm not concerned with what it might be 'objectively'. I'm talking about the basic desire not...
As the name suggests you can look at it both ways. I am really no Jain though. If I were I would not be able to survive as a landscaper! As for Anus.....
There doesn't appear to be any one way Buddhism sees things I did say "however that God might be conceived". The number one thing for Buddhism seems t...
Phenomenologically considered, feeling is more basic than cognition or perception. The infant's world is a world of indeterminate feeling before it is...
The feeling is not socially constructed, though. It must already exist in order to be named, referred to and spoken about. As I said before human feel...
I am not convinced that subjectrive feeling has been shown to be exhaustively socially constructed. Of course all subjective reactions are socially me...
Comments