You are viewing the historical archive of The Philosophy Forum.
For current discussions, visit the live forum.
Go to live forum

Janus

Comments

Nicely put! This is precisely Kant's problem with Hume's compatibilist stance on free will and moral responsibility, unless I am mistaken.
May 01, 2019 at 02:27
"Conscious" is an ambivalent term. On some definitions animals are of course conscious. Other definitions take consciousness to be synonymous with the...
May 01, 2019 at 01:32
Yes, it's become something of a beloved iconic image for the tripsters.
May 01, 2019 at 00:41
It's perhaps off-topic, but I am going to correct you on this. LSD-25 was first synthesized by Albert Hoffmann in the late thirties from lysergic acid...
May 01, 2019 at 00:31
Now you appear to be contradicting yourself, but perhaps I have misunderstood. When I asked if something that is illegal is necessarily immoral ("nece...
May 01, 2019 at 00:18
The problem I see with an affirmative answer is that if something is necessarily immoral if it is illegal, that entails that when something is legaliz...
April 30, 2019 at 23:00
I think for the sake of clarity and transparency there are some questions should answer: (1) If it is illegal is doing it necessarily immoral? If so, ...
April 30, 2019 at 04:56
But despite your propensity to doubt that anyone else knows you should say, in strict accordance with your own philosophy: since you only have a sampl...
April 30, 2019 at 02:34
I would be more inclined to say that the notion of transcendentalism comes from an intrinsic human need to wonder about, to search for, the ultimate n...
April 30, 2019 at 02:17
This is my last reply if you fail to engage relevantly. Where have I said anything against empiricism? And why will you not provide an argument to sup...
April 29, 2019 at 05:09
If you want me to argue against something, then provide something for me to argue against. How many times do you need that to be explained to you?
April 29, 2019 at 04:56
If you have no respect for philosophy, why are you participating here? You should let off the brake, and get whollyrolling away to some other more sui...
April 29, 2019 at 04:52
Why would my statement about your lack of close reading be meant to apply to me? You're doing it (or not doing it) again! I read your commentary which...
April 29, 2019 at 04:45
I haven't claimed you said that "metaphysics provides knowledge", but your statement that seemed to imply that this "possible understanding of things"...
April 29, 2019 at 04:29
Where have I said that science does not have any practical applications? And where have I spoken about metaphysics being of any "benefit" to humankind...
April 29, 2019 at 04:08
When I said this I should have added the qualification that I was referring only to those of us who have sufficient imagination.
April 29, 2019 at 04:02
No, I call a claim groundless when no ground has been proposed. First you'll have to provide some purported ground before I can show you that it fails...
April 29, 2019 at 03:52
I have no doubt you have plenty of other groundless pronouncements to make, too; but save your breath, I'm not buying. Yes, a key point that is often ...
April 29, 2019 at 03:49
How would we be able to achieve metaphysical knowledge by those means? The very idea of metaphysics is that, as a domain of enquiry, it is not within ...
April 29, 2019 at 02:34
What makes you think I said that?
April 29, 2019 at 02:08
As Kant pointed out we have an unavoidable tendency to wonder and speculate about the "ultimate" nature of things. We cannot achieve any such knowledg...
April 29, 2019 at 01:56
If it's possible that gods are "involved in the reality of existence" then it's possible that the gods inform some people and not others of their exis...
April 29, 2019 at 00:35
In: Assange  — view comment
You should read a little more closely and think a little more deeply; I never said that the "laws and decisions of nations" are "trivial". A guess or ...
April 28, 2019 at 21:21
In: Assange  — view comment
Sure it seems natural, but it does not follow that it is therefore desirable. If someone who apparently has not committed any act which is unequivocal...
April 28, 2019 at 03:18
Given that the prisoner believes he will hang the next week at noon on one of five days, on first examination the only day that could be a surprise is...
April 28, 2019 at 03:05
In: Assange  — view comment
It depends on what you mean by "crime". Is "computer intrusion" a crime regardless of who commits it? If not, and it is only a crime in certain instan...
April 28, 2019 at 01:42
In: Assange  — view comment
Indeed!
April 28, 2019 at 01:35
In: Assange  — view comment
I have no idea why you would say I am missing the point. It is trivially true that whatever happens can happen. For me the point is that if whatever h...
April 28, 2019 at 01:33
In: Assange  — view comment
How much "computer intrusion" do you think is perpetrated by intelligence agencies in the US and elsewhere?
April 27, 2019 at 10:36
In: Assange  — view comment
It's trivially obvious that if Assange is indicted by the US, then he can be indicted by the U S. The question is as to whether that indictment is jus...
April 27, 2019 at 10:31
In: Assange  — view comment
Well, it seems the thread was motivated by Assange's recent arrest. And in the linked video Waters specifically addresses what he sees as the implicat...
April 27, 2019 at 10:22
What if I don't want to wallow in your prostate with you? Oh wait, I forgot...ADHD, close reading, yeah, right on, brother!
April 27, 2019 at 02:25
Luckily we're safely tucked in the lounge and so beneath their notice.
April 27, 2019 at 02:23
"Both and or neither nor Said the mouse to the big black door Both and or neither nor Said the wallowing, self-referential mouse To the gloomily didac...
April 27, 2019 at 02:13
Are you sure?
April 27, 2019 at 02:04
I couldn't possibly fail to disagree with you less!
April 27, 2019 at 02:01
They can add whatever superfluities or supereffluences they like as long as it is in the form of nicely manageable pellets. Also, as long as they don'...
April 27, 2019 at 02:00
Because I don't know if I know, or because I know I don't know, or because I think the very idea of an evil rabbit is super cool, or because the very ...
April 27, 2019 at 01:48
I probably do, but I seem to have forgotten. I need a little of that good ole northern anamnesis!
April 27, 2019 at 01:44
I hope with all my heart that it will become a monumental ruin!
April 27, 2019 at 01:42
I can relate to that: the very idea of an evil rabbit is super-cool.
April 27, 2019 at 01:40
The problem is, this thread is stuck in the lounge, and lounging is not conducive to monumentality.
April 27, 2019 at 01:24
Is it considering it or considering whether to consider it? I don't know either, and I love not knowing.,. I don't know, and I love not knowing... (an...
April 27, 2019 at 01:17
"Monumental" or monomaniacal?
April 27, 2019 at 01:14
OK, I guess that's true. Should this thread be considered? I don't know how to begin considering it; so perhaps the question is "can" rather than " sh...
April 27, 2019 at 01:06
Damn it, you went ahead and did! :lol:
April 27, 2019 at 00:51
Yes, that way of looking at it makes good sense to me.
April 27, 2019 at 00:43
:rofl: Or to re-contextualize Groucho: I would never participate in a thread that would allow me to participate in it...
April 27, 2019 at 00:32
Well, I think that might be off-topic, but the basic objection I have is that no such calculus is really feasible. We cannot have mathematical certitu...
April 27, 2019 at 00:19
In: Assange  — view comment
Assange was the one who was instrumental in bringing the war crime to public attention. No doubt he was aware of the dangers involved in poking the ey...
April 27, 2019 at 00:16