You are viewing the historical archive of The Philosophy Forum.
For current discussions, visit the live forum.
Go to live forum

Janus

Comments

Apparently you misread what I wrote. I had in mind the commonly imagined scifi scenario, where you are traveling at close to the speed of light and al...
January 31, 2026 at 20:59
Yes, I agree that dualism is unsupportable. If we were traveling at speed close to c, aging of our bodies and all its physical processes would, accord...
January 30, 2026 at 22:56
If mental processes are independent of neural processes then they ought to be unaffected by the relativity of velocities. If they are not independent ...
January 29, 2026 at 23:46
I'm not sure what you are saying. Are you responding to my disagreement with "the rational is the real"? Are you pointing out that it could be true on...
January 25, 2026 at 22:21
You've changed the subject. You were talking about printing money to give to those who had lost jobs due to technology so they could remain as consume...
January 22, 2026 at 21:52
Inflation will only result if there is insufficient product to meet demand.
January 21, 2026 at 20:35
Right, and I agree; I think such an idea can be nothing more than that, an idea. Where I don't agree with Hegel is in his thought that actuality is id...
January 20, 2026 at 23:22
It just means we don't know everything about anything. There is always more to know about things and different ways to know them than those which are ...
January 20, 2026 at 19:28
I tend to favour seeing process, relation as ontologically fundamental rather than thing or substance being fundamental. So, things are processes, not...
January 19, 2026 at 22:43
It's a thorny question. What does "validated" mean? If it means verified, then the point seems moot since it is well-accepted in philosophy of science...
January 19, 2026 at 02:03
We can only figure out what the nature of time is in the context of how time appears to be to us. It doesn't follow that there is no time independent ...
January 19, 2026 at 01:14
Cheers, I think I already read that review on Medium. If it was the same one I found it a bit carping?I don't think Levin is concerned with promoting ...
January 18, 2026 at 23:54
Many people find their meaning in earning a living?that is, in their profession. You are speaking, and can speak, only for yourself.
January 17, 2026 at 21:31
Actually on second thought "scientific orthodoxy" seems a bit strong. "Popular image of the scientific view" seems more apt. What individual scientist...
January 16, 2026 at 22:26
I added a bit more to my post as you were responding. I don't think I'm specifically implying that you want to return to the "aegis of tutelage" (Hege...
January 16, 2026 at 04:40
I'm not sure which italicized passages you are referring to. I don't disagree that Galileo's distinction between primary and secondary qualities and D...
January 16, 2026 at 03:50
You accuse me of positivism when I distinguish between those claims which are amenable to testing, to empirical evidence or logical demonstration, fro...
January 16, 2026 at 03:16
You need to understand that the search for meaning is far more open today than it has been in the past. The "predicament" which is the really just the...
January 16, 2026 at 02:54
The spotlight analogy can be read as local, attentional awareness of what was already there in global consciousness. Like when you are driving, you ar...
January 15, 2026 at 23:24
That's very funny if not a little sad!
January 13, 2026 at 23:09
Yes, as if making sense for somebody is not ever attempting to make him (or her) believe...
January 13, 2026 at 22:05
I don't find much to disagree with there so I'll just comment on this: There is certainly a power to collective belief.
January 13, 2026 at 00:00
Exactly. Imagine if there were no plurality of views.
January 12, 2026 at 23:22
Thanks, I can make sense of what you say there. I'm radically open to entertaining different perspectives, and I'm not wedded to any of them, or even ...
January 12, 2026 at 21:56
I'll try another way of looking at this and see if it makes sense to you. I am going to kind of repeat what I already said. So, you say "the in itself...
January 11, 2026 at 22:07
The first statement says that space and time are relevant to or operative in some domain, which doesn't rule out that they are also relevant to or ope...
January 10, 2026 at 22:22
Any attempt to explicate just how things are does seem to generate inconsistencies, paradoxes, antinomies and I guess these could all be seen as perfo...
January 10, 2026 at 21:11
:up:
January 10, 2026 at 18:57
I'd say the producer, not the product, of our senses and cognitive apparatus seems more apt.
January 10, 2026 at 06:38
I don't see how you can escape the contradiction if you say which is exactly to say that the in itself is human mind-independent. Also, when you say "...
January 10, 2026 at 05:43
Thanks for your great effort. There is a lot there and I'm running out of time today so I will read through and if I have time select bits that seem t...
January 10, 2026 at 03:56
You contradict yourself?you say "the in itself is what lies beyond our conceptual and sensory reach", which is the very definition of human mind-indep...
January 10, 2026 at 03:18
I don't think this assessment is accurate if the Ancient Greeks philosophers are taken into account. Perhaps, but 'revelation' is a loaded term?I pref...
January 10, 2026 at 00:48
Are there? How do you know? Again, how do you know there is reincarnation? Yes, of course they are allegorical?I was only pointing out that all our su...
January 07, 2026 at 22:23
There is no change without energy, no constitution of anything without energy. The changes, the possibilities for different constitutions of things, s...
January 07, 2026 at 03:44
:ok:
January 07, 2026 at 00:45
I've read some of both, and much much more of Heidegger, and where I find difficulty is only where the language is obscure or ambiguous. The basic ide...
January 07, 2026 at 00:14
Do you mean the theory or the practice? If phenomenology consists in attending to experience, then the theory is unnecessary?which is not to say the p...
January 06, 2026 at 23:21
Fair enough?I guess "taboo" could just mean 'not acceptable'. It has been used on here in the other sense?to suggest that there is a fear of religion ...
January 06, 2026 at 22:27
The anti-modernist, neo-Romantic thing seems apt to me up here in Nimbin. :wink: I don't know what's its like in the cities these days?I haven't lived...
January 06, 2026 at 02:34
Right, of course we are looking at a ship not a mental image of one? this is shown by the fact that we can maintain a clear (but constantly changing) ...
January 06, 2026 at 02:01
That makes sense to me. I don't see why one could not be a (non-eliminative) physicalist without devolving into some form of dualism. One could mainta...
January 06, 2026 at 01:28
The problem for phenomenology is that all of what is said above is also a "theoretical artefact". Property dualism is discursively inescapable. I thin...
January 05, 2026 at 20:51
You've provided no counter-argument, just hand-waving.
January 04, 2026 at 22:35
It's simple; "taboo" implies a socially conditioned introjection governing responses and the presence of fear.
January 04, 2026 at 22:25
No, we know from observation that metals expland more than wood, for example does with heat, and wood more than metals with moisture. We know that woo...
January 04, 2026 at 22:23
?
January 04, 2026 at 21:31
Why interpret a principled rejection of the idea of transcendence as a "taboo"? It seems that some folk seek to psychologically explain away the holdi...
January 04, 2026 at 20:59
I'm saying that some technology is based on observation of how things behave, not on theories that explain why they behave the way they do. The analog...
January 04, 2026 at 20:47
Thermometers seem to be accurate enough to serve the medical industry. In my experience they show I have elevated temperature when I experience the sy...
January 03, 2026 at 23:35