You are viewing the historical archive of The Philosophy Forum.
For current discussions, visit the live forum.
Go to live forum

Janus

Comments

You seem to be equivocating on different senses of what it means to say that events could potentially be stated. It could be said that, at a time when...
January 11, 2021 at 22:36
The nature of meditative states cannot be definitively understood intellectually, They are affective, and exemplary of "that whereof we cannot speak"....
January 11, 2021 at 20:39
So called non-material explanations (explanations in terms of reasons) are only appropriate in regard to human, and some animal behavior. They only "l...
January 11, 2021 at 04:48
The so-called "Hard Problem" just consists in the perceived difficulty, or impossibility, of explaining the mind in physicalist language. For me it si...
January 11, 2021 at 04:30
It seems most plausible that there is 'something', not dependent upon us at all, that appears to us as a world of entities and events. It also seems m...
January 11, 2021 at 00:21
I don't know what this even means. I would say that there is a sense in which all questioning is, if not dictated, at least mediated in forms of subje...
January 10, 2021 at 23:13
Yeah, I am well familiar with that syndrome!
January 10, 2021 at 23:06
Before deciding that I would recommend you listen to the podcast I linked, where those statements are given in context. Even if you still disagree wit...
January 10, 2021 at 22:46
You might find this interesting Wayfarer. I read this several years ago and was reminded of Gabriel by the comment by jgill I responded to above. I fo...
January 10, 2021 at 22:18
Did you listen to the actual interview or form this judgement based on the out of context quote from Wikipedia? https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/...
January 10, 2021 at 22:09
Reads like loquacious Cartesianism!
January 10, 2021 at 20:07
:rofl:
January 10, 2021 at 03:41
I think you can rightly be held to be racist on the basis of either commission or omission; the latter consisting in failing to recognize the plight o...
January 10, 2021 at 03:33
Right, you're a racist then; so not worth engaging with; please fuck off now.
January 09, 2021 at 23:16
:100:
January 09, 2021 at 23:08
The Freudian slip is telling! Or perhaps it isn't a slip at all, which would be even more telling!
January 09, 2021 at 23:06
Send me something that cites baseless Democrat claims of voting fraud, not a video featuring a comedian. And in any case even if the democrats had mad...
January 09, 2021 at 22:58
If that is indeed true it would probably be so because they are an economically and socially oppressed and disadvantaged minority. And to further comp...
January 09, 2021 at 22:53
So, your general philosophical position is that people should act blindly and hope that their actions will turn out to be justified by evidence? And m...
January 09, 2021 at 22:44
What do you think the percentage of whites to blacks is?
January 09, 2021 at 22:32
Poor attention span I guess. It seems to go with the territory.
January 09, 2021 at 22:30
The truth may be hard, or even impossible to establish; if it's merely hard then evidence can be found and presented, if impossible then no evidence c...
January 09, 2021 at 22:29
They didn't do the right thing because they had no evidence that there had been voter fraud. Acting on blind belief is not doing the right thing. Even...
January 09, 2021 at 21:48
Extant meanings always carry with them the possibility of novel associations. They are never absolutely fixed. Recently I was reading a passage in Gre...
January 08, 2021 at 01:33
I agree that there is affectivity and empathy prior to language. We can see it in social animals. Language is a tool for representing meanings and ass...
January 07, 2021 at 22:56
Yes a nothing cannot be anything more than a conceptual fiction, otherwise it would not be a nothing, but a something.
January 06, 2021 at 22:22
I don't see that the categories; the families, genera and species and so on have been abandoned, but rather their interconnections have been better un...
January 06, 2021 at 22:05
Science would be impossible without conceiving of particular individual entities and specific categories; in other words without thinking sameness and...
January 06, 2021 at 21:22
It doesn't seem strange to me, but in accordance with how we understand past and future.
January 06, 2021 at 21:15
Different ways of talking about the nature of things are different conceptions of reality, though. If we want to think about ontology what else can we...
January 06, 2021 at 21:12
Of course I am not denying that the world is subtly different for each percipient, whether animal or human, but it is the one shared world which appea...
January 06, 2021 at 07:16
It's just the same as with anything else; the world, this particular environment, ocean, mountain and so on. There is only one world, one particular e...
January 06, 2021 at 06:31
It is the same language inasmuch as it has the same total lexicon.
January 06, 2021 at 04:29
That is untrue: the language is the same, the difference lies in each individual use of the one language. No two individuals use their language in exa...
January 06, 2021 at 04:17
Sure you can change the nuanced meanings of words, create novel nuances, associations and so on. But all of those nuances are themselves intelligible,...
January 06, 2021 at 04:10
Yes, but Tolkien and the reader only know what the words in that invented language mean or refer to by means of translating them into some public lang...
January 06, 2021 at 03:59
Seems interesting, thanks, I'll look at it. As I've said above, I consider that there are real possibilities or potentials; I don't see how it could b...
January 05, 2021 at 23:20
Of course there could be no nothing in this world, because this world is everywhere something. Even if there could somehow be a totally empty space it...
January 05, 2021 at 21:24
It is interesting that the web of actuality entails possibility, but then if there is to be any change, how could it be otherwise? I'm wary of referri...
January 05, 2021 at 21:19
You are conflating use and mention. From a post I made in your other thread: "Nothing is nothing, absolutely nothing. <Nothing> is the concept of noth...
January 04, 2021 at 22:20
Nothing is nothing, absolutely nothing. <Nothing> is the concept of nothing. It is a real concept, not imaginary. The idea of nothing, as idea, is ind...
January 04, 2021 at 22:05
Problem is if there were nothing there'd be no probability, and once there is probability there is already something.
January 03, 2021 at 21:40
I still cant see any reason to think it would be any more or less an instance of control than making a choice.
January 01, 2021 at 03:00
What makes you think we have any more (or less) control over delaying picking up the chosen can than we do over choosing which can? That's the bit of ...
December 31, 2020 at 23:51
I remember that he says in the book that he is not proposing anything beyond complex physical systems; systems, however, which cannot be explained jus...
December 31, 2020 at 00:55
Note "natural order", not supernatural order, and you purport to be an opponent of naturalism. For Kauffman the natural order is "self-organization, s...
December 31, 2020 at 00:08
You're forgetting the other half of the picture. If the proposition is also unverifiable, then why should we believe it is true? As the article pointe...
December 30, 2020 at 23:53
Kauffman's thesis is that life and mind are purely physical processes that emerge once the system becomes complex enough. He explicitly rules out any ...
December 30, 2020 at 23:41
Yes, that sounds about right.
December 30, 2020 at 23:19
Yes, there is. Read Stuart Kauffman's At Home in the Universe. https://www.amazon.com/At-Home-Universe-Self-Organization-Complexity/dp/0195111303/ref=...
December 30, 2020 at 23:16