You are viewing the historical archive of The Philosophy Forum.
For current discussions, visit the live forum.
Go to live forum

Srap Tasmaner

Comments

Btw, you can't delete posts, but you can edit them after you've posted. You could replace the whole thing with "" or something.
June 08, 2017 at 17:31
This helps a lot, in understanding what you have in mind. I'll do some thinking and reading and get back to you.
June 08, 2017 at 17:08
Okay. I suppose we could think of these as departures from the ordinary, practical, everyday run of things. Imagination seems to insinuate itself all ...
June 08, 2017 at 16:46
I don't understand your point here. Can you elaborate?
June 08, 2017 at 16:19
No no no. You have to be clear about the distinction between "being a member of ..." and "being a subset of ..." The null set has no members. It is a ...
June 08, 2017 at 16:16
I think you might be misreading the axiom of induction. It doesn't say that every natural number has all the properties of 0. It says IF 0 has the pro...
June 08, 2017 at 04:40
Yeah, I almost went back to change what I said there about cardinality. Then I decided that what I had written was probably already too much.
June 08, 2017 at 03:07
Does your question reflect honest philosophical consideration, or is it merely determined by your rightist/theist bias?
June 07, 2017 at 20:43
I had to chuckle at this. "Counterfactual" refers here to a world in which there are not miracles. That's meta, dude.
June 07, 2017 at 17:48
I have often thought that knowledge of the religions of other cultures, other societies, presents a challenge of some sort to religious belief. There'...
June 07, 2017 at 17:14
(There's a generic "you" throughout this post, who isn't you, @"Mariner". I trust you to point out where they overlap, if you'd like to.) I reread the...
June 07, 2017 at 16:22
In: [deleted]  — view comment
We probably should have done this at the beginning. P = "All actual or possible conscious systems must be allowed to develop." Q = "Unrestricted procr...
June 07, 2017 at 06:55
Can you elaborate?
June 06, 2017 at 19:38
Everyone agrees, I assume, that there is nonverbal experience, and nonverbal communication. It is also common for philosophers to claim that we have k...
June 06, 2017 at 19:17
Mariner, would you say all these things you describe, are things you experienced as existing, rather than reasoning that they exist?
June 06, 2017 at 18:29
In: [deleted]  — view comment
This is your claim, but I don't think it is sustainable. There is a distinction, which people clearly do recognize, between actual entities and possib...
June 06, 2017 at 18:20
0 isn't the null set {}, it's the cardinality of the null set, the number of elements of that set. (And given that, you can define 1 as the cardinalit...
June 06, 2017 at 16:15
I think there are people around here with some training, who might have some good advice for you, given your sister's history. I'm just a dad. I'll ju...
June 06, 2017 at 06:54
The only genuinely wise thing I've ever heard anyone say about parenting comes from a humorist from years ago named Erma Bombeck: It's come in pretty ...
June 06, 2017 at 05:42
I saw what you did there.
June 06, 2017 at 05:29
It's my impression that, in the United States at least, scientists feel more unified as a group now than they had for, I don't know, generations, prec...
June 06, 2017 at 05:24
In: [deleted]  — view comment
But what if you look at it the other way round? Suppose we start with the goal of controlling the growth of the human population, and are given two op...
June 06, 2017 at 04:52
In: [deleted]  — view comment
I see. Your argument is that if you're against abortion, you should be in favor of unrestricted sex. And that conclusion you do not block because, in ...
June 06, 2017 at 01:28
The word "justification" is unfortunate, because in ordinary usage it admits of degrees, the same way you might talk about having a lot or a little ev...
June 06, 2017 at 01:17
Gettier cases always feel to me like magic tricks or confidence games. You're elaborately given the opportunity to verify things that don't matter, an...
June 06, 2017 at 00:58
In: [deleted]  — view comment
I appreciate your response, but I still don't understand the argument. The Roman Catholic Church has traditionally taken exactly the option you sugges...
June 06, 2017 at 00:46
You're close, @"Arkady", if readers will tend to have an intuition that this doesn't count as knowledge, but they'll think that because they'll feel t...
June 05, 2017 at 23:32
I don't think you need most of paragraph 3 of you're just trying to build a Gettier case. You just need "Bob in fact stole the money." Your case seems...
June 05, 2017 at 22:54
In: [deleted]  — view comment
I think this is the weakest part of your argument. Surely we make a distinction between an actual, existing entity already on a trajectory toward cons...
June 05, 2017 at 21:28
I think this is a very nice point, but I would say science is a problem only for a certain sort of theism. Here's a story: I recently had a used copy ...
June 05, 2017 at 17:25
You're maybe not "eager," but let's say "comfortable" concluding that if Joe and Pete both assert that 2 + 2 = 4, then there must be something similar...
June 05, 2017 at 16:09
I'd be happy to try to explain what I understand of Frege's philosophy of mathematics, if you'd really like me to, but honestly Frege's writings are a...
June 05, 2017 at 16:06
Sure, "4" refers to 4, "2" refers to 2. I think Frege construes 2 + 2 as a function. "2" has a sense, and refers to 2. "+" has a sense, but doesn't re...
June 05, 2017 at 02:52
"2 + 2" and "4" are, usually, different ways of referring to 4. They have different senses, but the same reference. For mathematics and logic, the ref...
June 05, 2017 at 01:34
And "thinking a proposition" is a state of an individual's brain, right? It is not a relation between the individual and an object, the abstract objec...
June 04, 2017 at 16:58
I think this is a false dichotomy. The choice is not between manning the barricades and being a whiny little girl. One of the main things citizens do ...
June 04, 2017 at 14:32
In: Causality  — view comment
The sky is filled with glowing blue dots. I had always been a little uncomfortable using conditionals talking about cause and effect. Where the condit...
June 04, 2017 at 04:10
In: Causality  — view comment
I googled it -- I had forgotten about "Rayleigh scattering," that the small gas molecules will radiate the same wavelength they absorbed, so that's wh...
June 04, 2017 at 03:32
In: Causality  — view comment
Oh my, no, not humoring you. I've enjoyed and learned from both sides in this argument. I only pointed out the misreading to give you a chance to resh...
June 04, 2017 at 03:15
In: Causality  — view comment
Fair enough.
June 04, 2017 at 02:58
There are legal challenges currently working their way through the court system. But hey, why bother, amirite?
June 04, 2017 at 02:49
In: Causality  — view comment
I'm nearly convinced but this part throws me a little, so I could use an example. For the "why is the sky blue" example, you would do something like t...
June 04, 2017 at 02:33
In: Causality  — view comment
You misread@"andrewk"'s last post. Those were examples of "here's the cause" explanations, not the sort of explanation he was advocating.
June 04, 2017 at 01:53
Everybody does it, but it's well known that the GOP has turned gerrymandering into a way of life. It's easy to find sources: here's one. As for voter ...
June 04, 2017 at 01:23
In: Causality  — view comment
Isn't the obvious modern correlate of "final cause" "purpose"?
June 04, 2017 at 00:00
Very funny.
June 03, 2017 at 22:39
Should have addressed this before... Can you name me one business, government, non-profit, in fact any institution of any kind anywhere in the world t...
June 03, 2017 at 19:25
Would you grant that this is a somewhat different way of establishing the truth of a proposition than obtains in, say, physics, history, politics, bar...
June 03, 2017 at 19:01
I'll grant it was poorly worded. Sometimes we are uncertain until we have carried out the calculation. So I'll say it this way: if you think you can p...
June 03, 2017 at 17:48
If you think that 2 + 2 might be equal to 5 rather than 4, then you have not yet learned what these symbols mean.
June 03, 2017 at 17:01