You are viewing the historical archive of The Philosophy Forum.
For current discussions, visit the live forum.
Go to live forum

Philosophim

Comments

The philosophy of mind isn't dead, it just needs to be married to neuroscience and today's facts. People thinking they can solve philosophy of mind pr...
January 16, 2024 at 19:47
You as well jgill! I greatly enjoyed your contributions to the thread. Fantastic link Banno, I was not aware this was a study of philosophy. After rea...
January 12, 2024 at 23:24
My point is about context. "I would prefer to do X, but I should do this instead." Preference is often subjective. What you mean is a specified kind o...
January 12, 2024 at 15:16
Determinism is the idea that everything was completely set by rules from the beginning. Tempral causality simply means that a prior event is the reaso...
January 12, 2024 at 14:51
I appreciate the defense, but he posted that years ago. Its the only time I've ever had an issue with him and its long forgiven. 180 Proof and I are A...
January 11, 2024 at 02:00
If I understand you correctly, you're just talking about a mathematical origin. That's not the same as a first cause as defined in the OP. Lets envisi...
January 10, 2024 at 22:53
It makes me incredibly happy to hear you understood the paper and what the goal was. Possibly. If there is a need for it, I will. Honestly I've never ...
January 10, 2024 at 21:55
Certainly. But it should be 'seems because evidence points to this' vs 'seems because it requires far less work'.
January 10, 2024 at 18:30
Perfect. To me, this is one of the essences of philosophy. Question everything. Especially the bases you rest your assumptions on. We should be workin...
January 10, 2024 at 18:14
Ha ha! I'm glad. Philosophy should be fun too. :) There could be, absolutely. There is nothing that indicates that it would suddenly end. One such ran...
January 10, 2024 at 18:11
Basically I'm noting that there needs to be evidence of a miracle, and that this requires a methodical approach. Wine eventually turns into vinegar if...
January 10, 2024 at 17:44
The reliance on excessive vocabulary and technical jargon is the desperate cry for relevance and convincing others of its own importance. The more one...
January 10, 2024 at 17:39
This is a misunderstanding of statistics. It is not truly random and uncaused. We know the causes of radioactive decay. The use of statistics and chan...
January 10, 2024 at 17:26
I think you can simplify this down further. First you need to demonstrate a supernatural being is actually possible. A 'miracle', or a violation of th...
January 10, 2024 at 17:16
I appreciate it! I often feel my outside of the box philosophy is unapproachable for many people. I had a few professors in the past who were interest...
January 10, 2024 at 17:07
If nothing caused it, then it would be a first cause. A first cause has no prior explanation for its existence, it simply is. So you see, these suppos...
January 09, 2024 at 16:39
Interesting take urcarr! I posted a theory of knowledge a while back here: https://thephilosophyforum.com/discussion/14044/knowledge-and-induction-wit...
January 09, 2024 at 16:27
Sorry for the delay in answering. If there truly was no prior cause, then yes. I'm fairly certain that radioactive decay has pretty clear causes thoug...
January 09, 2024 at 16:23
Agreed. Once we get past the basic matter issue and onto people however, I think you'll see how this works. Just one step at a time so we don't have t...
January 09, 2024 at 02:07
Thanks! I'm less concerned with being right here as getting people to think. I'm glad you got to experience that. This right here. If "Existence shoul...
January 09, 2024 at 01:21
True. These points are just summaries. You'll need the full story by reading the typed out details afterwards. However, this has changed a bit from di...
January 08, 2024 at 22:20
Hi AmadeusD, appreciate the visit to the thread! For thread like this I'm presenting several very specific arguments that lead up to conclusions. I'm ...
January 08, 2024 at 20:16
Lets leave this for now then. I've tried explaining it a few times and I'm not sure how else to at this point. If you understand the statement "You sh...
January 08, 2024 at 19:56
I am begging the question. What is time if not related to the change between objects? :D Its easy in the first case because time is change between ent...
January 08, 2024 at 17:26
This is completely fair, and many people have a higher standard of knowledge that ties in with truth. Epistemology is one of my favorite topics, and I...
January 07, 2024 at 20:29
Recall this is not a proof that objective morality exists. This is an attempt to rationally identify what an objective morality would rationally be. W...
January 07, 2024 at 20:27
Knowledge and truth are not the same thing. Knowledge is the most reasonable conclusion we can make with the information we have at the time. That can...
January 07, 2024 at 19:43
How do you see "Doesn't know" as different from "unknowing"? Aren't they the same thing? No, we would need to see his evidence first. Einstein invente...
January 07, 2024 at 19:41
That's kind of the point. We're trying to come up with a reasonable explanation of time. I just mean that they never move. There is no outside observe...
January 07, 2024 at 19:25
Appreciate the tag. I read it with interest, just nothing further to add to the matter. :)
January 07, 2024 at 19:03
No, its just two particles. Lets say the particles are a little misshapen so its apparent they aren't even rotating around each other either. If they ...
January 07, 2024 at 02:37
The wisest words you've said here. Another conversation, another time.
January 07, 2024 at 01:48
Let me give you the thought experiment I'm thinking of so you can see what I mean. Lets say that only two particles exist in the entire universe. They...
January 07, 2024 at 01:46
Truth exists despite our knowledge of it. They are not the same thing. I can know physics today, but there may be aspects of it that aren't true which...
January 07, 2024 at 01:40
And here I thought we had a nice parting of the ways. You're simply asserting, "I'm wrong" then calling me a troll. Control yourself and bow out of a ...
January 06, 2024 at 23:22
Hey Bob, for some reason I completely missed that you had replied to this. Came in to review it and saw it luckily! Its just not internally coherent. ...
January 06, 2024 at 23:17
Yes, that's what an agnostic does. They don't have enough evidence to make a decision either way. But this seems to be upsetting you. Have the last wo...
January 06, 2024 at 23:10
Odd how riled up you are over this. I'm an atheist. I know God doesn't exist. Its not that hard. You seem to be confusing that knowledge means you hav...
January 06, 2024 at 22:58
Which is fine. Philosophy which refers to itself as something to look into and test is sound philosophy. We always need people poking and prodding at ...
January 06, 2024 at 22:48
You don't need to demonstrate that you know things because the evidence isn't adequate for it. I know that Zeus doesn't exist. Its not that I don't be...
January 06, 2024 at 22:46
I'm not a fan of any word that identifies a race in America as something special or different, considering our long and crappy history with racism. I ...
January 06, 2024 at 22:30
Several problems with this. 1. To reject an assertion that there is a God, you either have to believe that there is no God, or know that there is no G...
January 06, 2024 at 22:16
Who's calling themselves an agnostic atheist? That's just misunderstanding the definition of the terms. Agnostic - Doesn't know if God exists or not A...
January 06, 2024 at 22:04
Not a problem! I hope you enjoy your time here.
January 06, 2024 at 19:15
Welcome to the forum Elysium House! Just a heads up, you ended up replying to a 3 year old post. Check at the bottom of the post in the lower left cor...
January 06, 2024 at 18:51
Oh, I actually didn't mean to imply that. I'm not a person who believes all reality is dependent on our observation. I do believe there need to be at ...
January 06, 2024 at 13:55
I believe I noted that time was registered change between entities. That's not very specific of course. Do you have a definition of time that you like...
January 06, 2024 at 04:01
No, it is random by statistics. It is not actually violating the laws of physics. :) To have something without a prior explanation means there were no...
January 05, 2024 at 16:02
Time doesn't exist if nothing exists, that's true. However, there is one thing we're likely making a mistake on. If its true that there is no reason w...
January 05, 2024 at 14:48
We can even remove the virtual particle notion. If it is the case that the origin of the universe has no prior explanation for its existence, there ar...
January 04, 2024 at 14:56