You are viewing the historical archive of The Philosophy Forum.
For current discussions, visit the live forum.
Go to live forum

Deleted User

Comments

"actuality" https://www.google.com/search?q=actuality&oq=actuality&aqs=chrome..69i57j35i39l2j0l2j69i65j69i60j69i61.1047j0j7&sourceid=chrome&ie=UTF-8 a...
November 24, 2019 at 20:41
A kingside castle? The rest will have to wait till tomorrow. Interesting thoughts.
November 24, 2019 at 01:52
Sticking our nose in other countries' affairs is what we do. It's our leitmotif. (Cue Imperial March.)
November 23, 2019 at 23:27
:halo: :halo: :halo:
November 23, 2019 at 21:02
Hehe you're right.
November 23, 2019 at 20:24
Life is an experiment. Part of that experiment is fucking. People will always fuck. Q.E.D.
November 23, 2019 at 20:21
Putting money where one's mouth is - if you'd like to be taken seriously - entails passionate political action. Is your anti-natalism a fair-weather p...
November 23, 2019 at 19:50
I do.
November 23, 2019 at 18:26
Not sure how a direct quote constitutes slander - unless you consider your statements self-damaging.
November 23, 2019 at 18:16
(NOS4A2 quote is from the "etiquette" thread in the Lounge.)
November 23, 2019 at 17:44
Here's a parallel in Sextus Empiricus' Outlines of Pyrrhonism: "Before the founder of the sect to which you belong was born, the argument which you pr...
November 23, 2019 at 15:30
Banned @everybodybutme for being wrong, objectively.
November 23, 2019 at 04:15
That's a pretty sentence.
November 23, 2019 at 03:52
Has a philosopher ever been right? Convincing, maybe...
November 23, 2019 at 01:49
Nice teaser. Looking forward to it. Have a good weekend. :smile:
November 23, 2019 at 01:43
The ideological evangelist is a perfect counter-case to the ketch and the yawl. The nature of the evangelistic spirit is such that a foundational dive...
November 22, 2019 at 23:14
I'm thinking strictly of charity in connection to the presupposition of a background of shared belief. Not the patient and kind kind, or any other kin...
November 22, 2019 at 22:54
Rephrasing this to see if you think I understand you: Broadly speaking, to facilitate communication (or "translation") charity and the presupposition ...
November 22, 2019 at 22:09
This is clear to me. We assume a background of shared belief and practice charity to facilitate communication.
November 22, 2019 at 22:02
I agree the stock characters create an atmosphere of caricature. At the same time, I've encountered, on these forums, both simplistic reductive materi...
November 22, 2019 at 21:59
It must. :smile:
November 22, 2019 at 21:01
The People have found their champion. Trump has consistently evidenced a fierce, egoless passion for ferreting out corruption in every corner of the g...
November 22, 2019 at 20:23
If you take a look at a person's use of language, the difference between believing such and such is a ketch and such and such is a yawl is of minor si...
November 22, 2019 at 02:17
There's no relation between the two. "Scaling-up" and a "non-critical attitude" - those two aren't related. You caught the tail-end of a longer conver...
November 22, 2019 at 02:11
Yes. Learning more about Davidson by criticizing and questioning.
November 21, 2019 at 23:04
Thanks for the response. I'm busy with the human stuff today. Will respond to this soon. Like you: the earth calls us out of the clouds.
November 21, 2019 at 23:02
If the essence of a conceptual scheme can be located in a far-ranging belief, are we back to square one? Back to an essentially (although a belief- ra...
November 21, 2019 at 23:00
Not interested in refutation. Just exploration. I wasn't including Davidson.
November 21, 2019 at 18:49
Partial failure inasmuch as the immaterialist and materialist behave in a similar way, suggesting a common core of practical beliefs. I can't really i...
November 21, 2019 at 16:14
What if I did something strange - like start talking insistently about my immaterialism; in the evangelical fashion sometimes found on these forums? W...
November 21, 2019 at 14:01
Conceptual schemes, as we encounter them in philosophical exchange, are generally centered on disconnective differences in belief. What is the signifi...
November 21, 2019 at 06:21
Scenario: You're a materialist. I'm an immaterialist. You don't see evidence that we're different. Therefore you believe - what? - that I am also a ma...
November 21, 2019 at 05:06
"I learned freedom of will and undeviating steadiness of purpose; and to look to nothing else, not even for a moment, except to reason..." -Marcus Aur...
November 21, 2019 at 04:10
Secondary sources: https://www.unl.edu/henderson/Papers/SCHEMES.pdf https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111/j.1468-0114.2009.01332.x https://j...
November 21, 2019 at 03:52
It's a profound pleasure and allows the mind the liberty to scavenge both sides of a position. Unperturbed freedom of intellect. Ideally...
November 21, 2019 at 03:36
Me too. I've been on this site off and on for maybe seven years.
November 21, 2019 at 03:24
Part and parcel of being entrenched or submerged in a mode of thought. If I'm submerged in anything, it's Pyrrhonism.
November 21, 2019 at 03:22
Thanks. Re Davidson, the analytic veterans don't seem to be overly critical in their thinking.
November 21, 2019 at 03:16
You never really got a solid answer to that one over in the other thread. I don't see a clear answer. It's a nontrivial.
November 21, 2019 at 03:03
My understanding so far: yes, in examining schemes "different, even contradictory, things might be counted true." But these would be translatable in t...
November 21, 2019 at 02:33
Take the phrase: "il pleut" is not true in English Is translation from one language to another a strong enough basis for or analogue to the kinds of t...
November 21, 2019 at 02:08
Suppose I say: The universe consists entirely of mind. How, as a materialist, do you translate this statement?
November 21, 2019 at 01:31
Paragraph by paragraph, beginning with page 15 and the question of “fitting.” Engaging the question of fitting we turn to complete sentences. It is se...
November 21, 2019 at 01:16
Thanks. Working on a paragraph-by-paragraph exegesis beginning with the notion of "fitting." I think I understand the essay up to that point.
November 21, 2019 at 00:41
Davidson: The point is that for a theory to fit or face up to the totality of possible sensory evidence is for that theory to be true. This phrase - t...
November 20, 2019 at 23:38
You might be right. That's what I've been doing. Feel free to leave a commentary.
November 20, 2019 at 23:22
Always the politician. In-group and out-group rigidity. Rigid exclusivity of the "view-from-everywhere"; something I anticipated and Cassandraed about...
November 20, 2019 at 23:02