You are viewing the historical archive of The Philosophy Forum.
For current discussions, visit the live forum.
Go to live forum

Wayfarer

Comments

Humans are subjects of experience. The idea that a being is simply 'information processing' is one of the basic fantasies of scientism. Really you sho...
December 10, 2016 at 09:45
Hint - has horns, pitchfork. Very cunning. (Speaking as one who just fell of the wagon, again.)
December 10, 2016 at 09:41
'Direct realists' are simply those who take the 'testimony of the senses' on face value. There is no question of 'how the mind synthesises perceptions...
December 10, 2016 at 09:23
it's not an object.
December 10, 2016 at 03:41
What you're not allowing for is the possibility of 'real abstractions'. In your view 'abstractions' are simply 'mental phenomena', which must be conse...
December 09, 2016 at 23:55
Your diet is deficient in irony :-) ONLY given a particular, and physicalist, notion of what constitutes 'reality'. There are alternatives that are no...
December 09, 2016 at 23:17
Good point. It is said in traditional theology that angels have no need for speech. The issue is, what is 'thinking'? Whole can'o'worms there. But one...
December 09, 2016 at 22:09
I notice in the side-bar the comment 'The existence of the other worlds makes it possible to make sense of physics without action-at-a-distance, objec...
December 09, 2016 at 20:24
If DNA constitutes 'essence', then the idea is obviously mistaken. Big 'if', though.
December 09, 2016 at 20:21
I said that quantum physics is on the border of what can be known. Maybe there will be no theory to replace it with. Maybe it's something we'll never ...
December 09, 2016 at 11:10
on the grounds of the inherent implausibility there being parallel universes. Given the assumption there are, there are mathematical 'solutions' to va...
December 09, 2016 at 05:33
I see your point, but I think it's incoorect. There are in those 'domains of discourse' very exacting methods of adjudicating truth-claims. Zen Buddhi...
December 08, 2016 at 21:51
according to scientific method, which is founded on excluding some domains of understanding at the outset. But then we forget what had been excluded.
December 08, 2016 at 21:12
but when the initial decision is made to entertain the notion of many worlds, then a whole series of consequences flow on from that. But I'm sceptical...
December 08, 2016 at 21:06
The question I am asking is, if 'parallel universes or histories is the solution, what is the problem?' Why is it necessary to postulate such an appar...
December 08, 2016 at 09:53
sorry, it's the first phrase.
December 08, 2016 at 09:38
I take issue with the first sentence: If it's not true, then what? That is the philosophical question.
December 08, 2016 at 08:52
Not really - I don't think the ding an sich is a religious idea. A snippet on Tillich And a supporting passage concerning Hegel's philosophy of religi...
December 08, 2016 at 06:49
You will notice that frequently in this discussion, the reality of the other worlds is put in quotes- 'other', or 'real'. A typical example is the Wik...
December 07, 2016 at 10:47
And I'm saying, there is a distinction in 'kinds or levels of being' that has been lost in the transition to modernity. Have a read of the SEP entry t...
December 07, 2016 at 10:17
Not 'my usage'. You're writing a blog on SETI. Would you say 'SETI has found evidence of billions and billions of beings?' You're a fire-chief outside...
December 07, 2016 at 10:02
Let me ask you this question, then. There is a well-known research programme, called SETI - Search for Extraterrestial Inteligence. This programme has...
December 07, 2016 at 09:58
Think about what in ordinary speech are called 'beings'. (It's quite a small list).
December 07, 2016 at 09:48
I see a fundamental distinction between objects and beings; because beings are subjects of experience whereas chairs (etc) are not. Which is why in cl...
December 07, 2016 at 09:43
What I have tried to argue is that the terms 'being' and 'existence' aren't exactly synonymous, but that this is a very hard distinction to make in th...
December 07, 2016 at 06:45
Hang in and keep studying, this is a sign of progress. Now you're getting close to real scepticism.
December 06, 2016 at 08:59
I think you're demonising. Certainly there are people like that, but I'm not addressing them - what would be the use? My aims are a lot more modest. S...
December 06, 2016 at 08:55
The city getting rich from fake news http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/magazine-38168281
December 05, 2016 at 21:43
You often say that, but then you proceed to write in the full confidence that those who read your posts understand what you mean. But if your posts me...
December 05, 2016 at 09:49
Berkeley always described himself as an empiricist and said there was no empirical evidence of objects outside ideas and perceptions. But this was und...
December 05, 2016 at 08:39
This is problematical, because there are very few people who claim to understand what this 'principle' means; and then, of course, if you don't unders...
December 05, 2016 at 04:45
But with real blood. X-)
December 05, 2016 at 03:40
That it sounds a bit close to religious fundamentalism for my liking! Actually the conflict between science and religion in post-Enlightenment Europe ...
December 05, 2016 at 02:18
That's because I don't see any conflict between spirituality and science! There are conflicts between religious fundamentalism and scientific material...
December 04, 2016 at 23:11
A lot of people like myself found Buddhism as a result of the search for an alternative form of spirituality, which is why, in the West, it has been a...
December 04, 2016 at 21:59
Esse est percipe is a phrase that is inexorably connected with Berkeley, who is also the poster boy for subjective idealism. Nothing 'confusing' about...
December 04, 2016 at 10:47
those who have never laboured through Berkeley's texts are always convinced that he can be refuted with a sentence or two.
December 04, 2016 at 09:52
“William James describes a man who got the experience from laughing-gas; whenever he was under its influence, he knew the secret of the universe, but ...
December 04, 2016 at 09:07
Just finished Quantum, Manjit Kumar. Excellent account of the Bohr-Einstein debates for non specialists.
December 04, 2016 at 08:54
That's all I meant. 'Imago Dei' is a different matter. ( I have Owen Barfield's book too, which was recommended on the old Forum. I think we have many...
December 04, 2016 at 04:58
It's a good analogy, except genes are physical. In pre-modern cultures, there was the belief that being born is itself a kind of misfortune; an old In...
December 04, 2016 at 03:51
Augustine's theory of original sin, as interpreted by Calvin. It's obviously a massive and weighty topic, subject of volumes of books so I preface the...
December 04, 2016 at 01:33
Well, Feser has answers for that:
December 03, 2016 at 23:56
First glance, looks good. Has a good selection from both Theravada and Mah?y?na sources. I agree with that interpretation of anatta on the homepage, a...
December 03, 2016 at 22:59
That book has guided my practice since the 1980's.
December 03, 2016 at 22:27
To Meet the Real Dragon by Gudo Nishijima et al. Link: http://a.co/bOkHKsm I did mention 'Unintended Reformation' on the old forum, and since got hold...
December 03, 2016 at 22:25
Ed Feser, who describes himself as 'Aristotelean-Thomist', presents the idea that 'the concept of triangle' is neither a visual representation or a pa...
December 03, 2016 at 22:23
Various gnostic religions sought to escape the world altogether, but Christianity is surely aimed at redeeming the world; the sacrifice of Jesus was m...
December 03, 2016 at 11:08
Well, this is as good a place as any to hash the ideas out, as it's a forum. But, you can't leave it at 'you get what I mean'. When you're talking abo...
December 03, 2016 at 10:57
Sorry! Didn't get that far. As I say, can't get back into Scribd. But the problem is that some ideas have physical consequences. If you have a theory ...
December 03, 2016 at 10:19