You are viewing the historical archive of The Philosophy Forum.
For current discussions, visit the live forum.
Go to live forum

Wayfarer

Comments

In: Rebirth?  — view comment
Sure - ‘extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence’. But what makes such cases 'extraordinary'? It's because, as I said, they go against the ...
May 07, 2019 at 21:53
Good, glad that’s settled then.
May 07, 2019 at 10:52
Google ‘elephant parable’.
May 07, 2019 at 10:15
What evidence are you referring to?
May 07, 2019 at 06:46
actually that quotation you’ve provided on buddhanature does come close to heterodoxy from a Buddhist p.o.v. That’s because the Buddha always denied a...
May 07, 2019 at 04:49
If you mean, do I think there is in principle an explanation for scientific laws, the answer is: I don't think there is. As I said, given that there a...
May 07, 2019 at 02:00
In: Rebirth?  — view comment
Cuts both ways, you know. I'm not proselytizing although I don't share the same distrust of anything religious that you habitually exhibit. Actually, ...
May 07, 2019 at 00:59
In: Rebirth?  — view comment
Yes, but bear in mind (and this is getting way off topic), the 'philosophy of experience' in Buddhism (which is the subject of the texts known as abhi...
May 07, 2019 at 00:02
In: Rebirth?  — view comment
I think that is based on a common misinterpretation of the Kalama Sutta: So, experience plays a part, but also, the goal of the path is not generally ...
May 06, 2019 at 23:33
In: Rebirth?  — view comment
I think that's a very disappointing and rather prejudiced response on your part, although I do understand the prejudices that invariably attend this t...
May 06, 2019 at 23:14
In: Rebirth?  — view comment
Stevenson accumulated case information from the early 1980's until his death in 2007. Ultimately he collated around 2,700 cases where children were in...
May 06, 2019 at 21:31
In: Rebirth?  — view comment
If it were as simple as you suggest, there would be no data.
May 06, 2019 at 21:00
Alan Watts’ ‘The Supreme Identity’ is about this question.
May 06, 2019 at 20:58
In: Rebirth?  — view comment
Then don't ask it.
May 06, 2019 at 10:15
In: Rebirth?  — view comment
It’s not spin. He was generally ignored and often maligned. Reincarnation is a cultural taboo in Western culture, as a matter of fact. It goes against...
May 06, 2019 at 09:57
In: Rebirth?  — view comment
I got one of his books out of the library once, and read some of it. One of the things he said in the article I linked was ‘the will not to believe is...
May 06, 2019 at 09:40
In: Rebirth?  — view comment
The point simply is, a lot of people will say ‘well what possible evidence could there be....’ when, thanks to Stevenson - generally ignored or malign...
May 06, 2019 at 09:13
In: Rebirth?  — view comment
The main researcher was a Professor Ian Stevenson, who held a privately-endowed chair at the University of Virginia (died 2007). He described more tha...
May 06, 2019 at 08:46
I see the issue as this - given scientific laws/regularities/order, then science can do an awful lot of work. But it doesn't explain those laws; it do...
May 06, 2019 at 05:44
In: Rebirth?  — view comment
As far as evidence is concerned - evidence concerning 'rebirth' or 'previous lives' is about the only kind of post-death evidence that is possible to ...
May 06, 2019 at 04:10
In: Rebirth?  — view comment
There is evidence of children recalling previous lives. See this article.
May 05, 2019 at 21:08
Newly published book on Kierkegaard here.
May 05, 2019 at 10:03
Entered a post in error but users can’t delete own posts here so replaced the text with *
May 05, 2019 at 00:58
I wonder where/how maths fits in this ensemble? It’s only because of ‘observable regularities’ that science can even do its work. In a totally unorder...
May 04, 2019 at 07:35
A footnote on ‘creationism’ - it forms no part of the official doctrines of Anglicanism, Roman Catholicism, or Eastern Orthodox communions. It is main...
May 04, 2019 at 05:23
Right! The original intent of 'the secular state' is to provide a framework within which you are free to practice any religion or none. However, this ...
May 04, 2019 at 00:47
Just to re-focus: the discussion about whether only particular things are real, or whether universals are also real, is not an empirical question, bec...
May 04, 2019 at 00:01
as soon as you argue about ‘what kinds of things exist’ then you’re no longer talking empiricism but philosophy. How many species of X there are, how ...
May 03, 2019 at 23:48
Kind of you to say so! It rings true, but I'd be interested if you could dig up a reference for that. How is nominalism an empirical argument, then?
May 03, 2019 at 23:21
First - your argument is not empirical, but metaphysical. It is not an argument about any state of affairs in the world, but a statement about the way...
May 03, 2019 at 22:46
The issue here is this: the mind itself, what is that 'makes humans conscious', whilst it may or may not be 'supernatural', it is not an object of cog...
May 03, 2019 at 22:40
But, you haven't given any argument for it. You've simply said 'Because of nominalism, it can't be true'. Whereas I'm actually making an argument! And...
May 03, 2019 at 22:22
If your principles are challenged by an argument, then you've either got to defeat the argument or change your principles.
May 03, 2019 at 22:13
The Parmenides is arguably the very beginning of philosophy proper. As Whitehead said that Western philosophy is 'footnotes to Plato', Plato saw himse...
May 03, 2019 at 06:57
One way to argue against that, is to say that such capacities as rational inference and abstract thought are of a different order to anything disclose...
May 03, 2019 at 02:42
Indeed they do. The key word is 'reducible to'. Another way of putting it is that such things as consciousness, ideas, thoughts, and so on, supersede ...
May 03, 2019 at 02:40
I accept there is a border and immigration crisis in the US, but I don't understand why anyone would think that this most inept and mendacious of pres...
May 03, 2019 at 01:23
:up:
May 02, 2019 at 22:57
Just think about the argument on its merits. If you can demonstrate something wrong about it, then I'll revise my view.
May 02, 2019 at 22:45
There’s a basic principle which I think defeats ‘brain-mind identity’ theory. This is that symbolic representation and abstraction literally cannot be...
May 02, 2019 at 21:43
James Comey’s May Day OP is a must read. Regarding the Border Wall: let’s remember the H.L. Mencken saying - ‘for every complex problem there is a sol...
May 02, 2019 at 10:00
I'm very suspicious of those brain-scan studies. Sure, once you build up a big enough database then you can infer meaning from the data, but what is t...
May 02, 2019 at 08:38
In: Bannings  — view comment
She was a zoologist?
May 02, 2019 at 06:54
Well, he's going to get away with what was reported by Mueller. Again, he will succeed in lowering the standard of the office such that things that an...
May 02, 2019 at 06:53
Agree - I think that is also part of the traditional understanding.
May 01, 2019 at 21:43
That's a really interesting passage, isn't it? You can almost see Schopenhauer struggling with the implications of this "better consciousness", which ...
May 01, 2019 at 21:29
That’s what I’m getting at. A certain kind of suffering - actually, very many kinds - can be managed through medicine - but I don’t know if that is ap...
May 01, 2019 at 11:31
Completely agree. The only observation I would make is that, left to their own devices, people won’t generally do this. It doesn’t come naturally. So ...
May 01, 2019 at 10:05
Do you see the presumption in this statement?
May 01, 2019 at 10:01