You are viewing the historical archive of The Philosophy Forum.
For current discussions, visit the live forum.
Go to live forum

Wayfarer

Comments

Against better judgement, I want to revisit this exchange. My claim was that when a subject is persuaded by another's reasoning and realises the truth...
June 28, 2023 at 00:07
At least you'd learn to dance.
June 27, 2023 at 09:33
Is 'the epistemic cut' avoidable, do you think? It seems a necessary condition of existence. Which would explain why the 'self-overcoming' or 'detachm...
June 27, 2023 at 08:33
‘ Conservatives Are More Open to Seemingly Inferior Products Political Leaders Than Liberals Are’
June 27, 2023 at 06:33
Hey, I'll be a hundred. Better look after my health if I want to see it. It's an interesting article. I have no trouble accepting the idea that insect...
June 27, 2023 at 05:41
Speaking of Hart, take a look at his review of Dennett ('so preposterous as to verge on the deranged'). I think the original post makes a perfectly in...
June 27, 2023 at 05:05
:party:
June 27, 2023 at 04:36
The act of putting them there is physical, from which you then can draw mathematical conclusions. Dual, you see - physical in some respects, mental in...
June 27, 2023 at 04:35
All I know is that it was the novel in which there was a metal dildo called Steely Dan which then provided the name for the well-known musical ensembl...
June 27, 2023 at 04:22
The philosophical distinction between physical causation and logical necessity, and the implications of that. For eliminative materialism, the claim r...
June 27, 2023 at 03:35
No, they're mainly picking arguments with me. I select Daniel Dennett because he's unapologetically materialist so I can't be accused of attacking a s...
June 27, 2023 at 02:56
I'm sure that Lloyd Gerson doesn't misunderstand Aristotle, it's more likely that I misunderstand Lloyd Gerson, or rather, have taken one of his argum...
June 27, 2023 at 00:09
It's highly relevant. When you say, 'ah, I see' - what is it you're seeing? That is indeed the point at issue. In the physicalist view that is the sub...
June 26, 2023 at 23:08
Of course you will assume that information is physical, given that everything must be. The apparently inviolable constraints of physical laws have bee...
June 26, 2023 at 22:41
I'd really appreciate it if you deleted that inane graphic.
June 26, 2023 at 22:04
C'mon. What expertise is needed? Either you see a reason or you don't. What I'm asking you is that if I persuade you to accept something - not even th...
June 26, 2023 at 22:02
My claim is that the perceived dichotomy between material and immaterial is a consequence of Cartesian dualism. Recall that Descartes posited mind as ...
June 26, 2023 at 21:44
How do you interpret that? How does it bear on the topic? In respect of the general question, one way of thinking about it is that the search for gene...
June 26, 2023 at 08:03
Shall I paraphrase?
June 25, 2023 at 11:44
I'm sure that whatever way we try and conceive of as 'an immaterial entity or process' will miss the mark. It requires, as one of the earlier contribu...
June 25, 2023 at 08:05
Say if I suggested 'mind' or 'consciousness' as a hypothetical answer - how could you go about defining that in objective terms? You can't ever cognis...
June 25, 2023 at 05:01
Fair point. A lot of Wallace' Victorian prose is pretty hideous in today's terms, specifically all the references to 'savages', but I still think the ...
June 25, 2023 at 01:05
Looks a cool book. Some of those Big History types talk about those kinds of topics (Brian Swimme comes to mind. Oh, and I thought you said 'someone n...
June 25, 2023 at 00:59
Because there's nothing in the theory that addresses it specifically. The theory is about the factors that contribute to the survival and evolution of...
June 25, 2023 at 00:30
You're quite right. Please note the terms of reference provided in the original post. It is quite specific about the type of physicalism the argument ...
June 24, 2023 at 23:52
As you point out, logic itself is not necessarily descriptive of the world of experience - something can be logically true but physically impossible, ...
June 24, 2023 at 23:33
That's what it seems to me, but I appreciate the fact that you directly addressed it, rather than changing the subject or digressing. That's subjectiv...
June 24, 2023 at 23:16
I have read that Penrose is saying these anomalies might support his 'CCC' cosmology, which is the idea that the Universe goes through an endless cycl...
June 24, 2023 at 22:42
And I would guess that this is because it purportedly gets them off the hook from having to defend the ridiculous implications of reductive materialis...
June 24, 2023 at 22:32
I believe I have successfully defended it in numerous places in this dialogue, and I don’t think Srap’s criticisms come to terms with the argument. Sa...
June 24, 2023 at 21:51
Imagine the lucky guy who gets to execute the warrant.
June 24, 2023 at 06:44
Gee I bet the CIA and State Dept are breaking out popcorn.
June 24, 2023 at 05:59
I can see you have not been persuaded by the argument thus far and probably won’t be, until you can see a reason why you should accept. At that point,...
June 24, 2023 at 05:31
Philosophy, I would hope. I think the lineage of the argument can plausibly be traced back to the Phaedo.
June 24, 2023 at 02:33
By giving reasons, yes? As distinct from twisting your arm, or threatening you in some other way.
June 24, 2023 at 02:24
You haven't provided anything to 'get' save reference to a youtube video and various links. If you're suggesting a superior paradigm, as distinct from...
June 24, 2023 at 02:12
Of course not, but you've already made that point, and I've said that it's not really relevant to the argument at hand. I want to double back to this ...
June 24, 2023 at 01:04
Sure it can. If I believe that P, and this entails that I believe that Q, then that is entailment. You're splitting hairs.
June 23, 2023 at 23:36
In: Bannings  — view comment
At least now he can stick to his knitting.
June 23, 2023 at 23:03
That's a theory similar to J S Mill's. To which the Kantian rejoinder is, that it would be impossible to arrive at 'synthetic generalisations from exp...
June 23, 2023 at 22:56
However, if I adopt a view on account of logic, then that informs my 'belief states', I am willing to accept it, and act on it. How could you specify ...
June 23, 2023 at 22:49
The target of the argument is re-iterated in this post, the passage commencing 'The materialist worldview presumes a mechanistic base level. This does...
June 23, 2023 at 22:28
Isn't that psychologism? The philosophical position that asserts that all meaningful statements or concepts can ultimately be reduced to psychological...
June 23, 2023 at 22:26
Some notes on 'transcendental arguments': 'What is typical of transcendental arguments proper is that they purport to establish the conditions necessa...
June 23, 2023 at 22:16
Not 'taking for granted': presenting an argument for it, which I don't believe you've addressed - or at least, until this post.
June 23, 2023 at 22:13
It is the subject of the OP, and the basis for an argument. Well, hopefully, that is what the overall aim of philosophy is for anyone engaged in it.
June 23, 2023 at 22:03
From what, to what?
June 23, 2023 at 22:01
:up: Leibniz is frequently cited as one of the predecessors to David Chalmer's 'Facing up to the Problem of Consciousness'
June 23, 2023 at 22:01
All of which is quite irrelevant if you were doing an actual exercise in logic. But rationally-inferred propositions aren't a matter of belief at all ...
June 23, 2023 at 21:55
There's a very well-worn saying in America, 'why does the Devil have all the best tunes?' The answer is 1, because rock and roll has a beat - we know ...
June 23, 2023 at 05:20