You are viewing the historical archive of The Philosophy Forum.
For current discussions, visit the live forum.
Go to live forum

Mr Bee

Comments

I'd have to agree with the others in the thread. The other forum had an upvote/downvote system and I never understood why it was there. Seeing that a ...
January 08, 2018 at 03:09
Depends on what you mean by "person". The self is difficult to define, but for the most part (regardless of which way you choose to define who "you" a...
December 29, 2017 at 02:16
Yes, but what I meant was that the cogito is based upon our certain knowledge of our direct experience. Knowing that "I think" is the same as knowing ...
December 24, 2017 at 03:38
In: I am God  — view comment
This implicitly assumes that a God actually does exist that would create your greatest reality. But does he really? You have not shown that there is i...
December 24, 2017 at 02:53
Yeah, I agree that knowledge about experience does not necessarily provide us with any knowledge of the external world. We could only infer it at best...
December 21, 2017 at 05:35
Not sure what you mean by "trick of language" here, but I don't think our knowledge of our experience is useless at all. Pretty much everything we kno...
December 20, 2017 at 18:28
Well, let's say you find yourself having a red experience via. introspection. It's right there in front of you, you can point to it and refer to it as...
December 20, 2017 at 09:17
How so? Can you offer an example of this? I am currently thinking about the sentence you just wrote, and this is what I find upon reflecting upon my e...
December 19, 2017 at 03:15
It depends on your views on time really. Traditionally we understand it to be an instant, or duration-less (as someone like Augustine would say, it's ...
December 12, 2017 at 11:22
What are "acausal interactions from beyond spacetime" supposed to mean?
November 27, 2017 at 12:21
Non-locality doesn't necessarily have to violate causality. From what I've read, FTL effects can be accepted without retrocausation provided one give ...
November 27, 2017 at 02:04
Sounds good, I think. To me, saying that everything exists in this "eternal present" is just a way of saying that they currently exist. Saying that th...
October 23, 2017 at 00:00
Well, Eternalism is well-known for being counter-intuitive (again, you can look that up if you're skeptical), unless you want to argue that it is a co...
October 22, 2017 at 18:27
Nope, because under eternalism, it simply isn't the case that Christmas "will exist". Christmas doesn't just pass into existence and October out of it...
October 22, 2017 at 17:53
No it isn't. If you don't believe in an objective flow of time then there is no meaning to saying that events have occurred or will occur. That is rea...
October 22, 2017 at 04:41
The author of the article refers to two different senses of the term "now", one in which he calls "ontological" and the other "temporal locative". Whe...
October 22, 2017 at 02:28
I actually argued for something similar to this in a thread a few months back. I think your conclusion refers to the stage view of persistence, which ...
October 20, 2017 at 20:49
Well, they are certainly more "real" than say, Santa Claus or Harry Potter. This is what I meant when I said that they are more than fictional. We sti...
October 08, 2017 at 22:59
The past and future do not exist, but they did exist and they will exist respectively. If you believe that there are facts about what happened then I ...
October 08, 2017 at 03:38
I think the better question would be if the concept of time travel even makes sense. If you time travel to the past with the sole purpose to prevent a...
October 08, 2017 at 00:25
I'm not sure if the concept of existence can even be defined. To me, it sounds more like a fundamental term, one that cannot be reduced to anything el...
October 02, 2017 at 21:56
Agreed. One deals with physics, while the other deals with metaphysics. The scientific models by themselves don't necessitate any particular worldview...
September 26, 2017 at 11:42
Even if the soldier would feel guilty if they didn't perform their action, was that what was on their mind when they saved their comrades? Were they t...
September 20, 2017 at 05:00
If Mr. Irreductionist's objection to Mr. Reductionist's picture amounts to a merely pointing out that the individual motions of the particles requires...
September 09, 2017 at 13:38
Is altruistic action necessarily mutually exclusive with inflicting harm though? If the intent of causing suffering in others is so that they too can ...
September 06, 2017 at 16:02
What about our conversation? Are you doubting whether or not we are having a discussion right now? You're right, there isn't. I've no idea what you're...
September 04, 2017 at 07:51
I don't, but I thought our conversation was about defining reincarnation.
September 04, 2017 at 07:02
The entity that is having the experience. As for what that entity is exactly, that is something I cannot answer, as that is linked to the problems of ...
September 04, 2017 at 06:54
The same subject who had Napoleon's experiences now has Banno's experiences. I honestly have no idea what's not to get about that.
September 03, 2017 at 09:10
Banno is the reincarnation of Napoleon in the sense that both of those individuals share the same subject of experience. Do you have a problem with th...
September 03, 2017 at 08:00
Perhaps I have trouble understanding your scenario, but the idea of someone freezing their own time without freezing the time outside themselves doesn...
August 31, 2017 at 19:37
I wasn't really referring to our livelihood, but the type of government that a country would have over time. Speaking of livelihood though, you say th...
August 27, 2017 at 18:51
Um, since when did choice become a part of all this? Our discussion mainly had to do with determinism and its compatibility with QM, and not with free...
August 24, 2017 at 03:13
As if Bell and Bohm were the only Bohmians around. And everyone else is simply biased against Bohm? I'm sorry, but there have been plenty of physicist...
August 24, 2017 at 02:47
To be frank, I am still skeptical that many people, including physicists who should know better, are prone to this error. Some part of me suspects tha...
August 24, 2017 at 01:45
Hmm, interesting. I didn't know of that. Unfortunately, like I said earlier, I have no technical knowledge to rely on so I can't look into it. The bes...
August 24, 2017 at 00:02
Then perhaps you can show me a quote where he specifically says that his Bohmian theory is indeterministic.
August 23, 2017 at 23:18
What's the difference? Is causal compatible with uncaused indeterminism? I'm sorry, but it's actually common knowledge that the Bohm interpretation is...
August 23, 2017 at 21:36
Yeah, I originally meant to say that the vast majority of our scientific theories (barring QM which is debatable) are and have been deterministic and ...
August 23, 2017 at 21:08
Then what are the scientists looking for if not laws that describe how our world works? This is the listing of all of the interpretations of QM (there...
August 23, 2017 at 20:57
Yeah, determinism has zero evidence, apart from the fact that we find that pretty much everything in the physical universe is determined by the laws o...
August 23, 2017 at 20:30
Not necessarily true. The Copenhagen interpretation of QM says that there is indeterminism, but there also exist other interpretations as well that sa...
August 23, 2017 at 20:25
Okay, so what exactly in the infinite chain is objectionable? Also, what is this "Modus-Ponen's infinite regress" you're referring to? Quick google se...
August 22, 2017 at 22:48
I think this sounds similar to my own theory, just with different wording. Instead of saying that an infinite regress involves "solving a problem", yo...
August 22, 2017 at 17:01
First off, I would want to say that I do not believe in any sort of "objective" morality. Or to put it another way, I don't think that there any absol...
August 22, 2017 at 13:02
I think it's the opposite really. Democratic systems tend to change their ruling party from time to time (for instance just look at the U.S. where the...
August 20, 2017 at 07:10
Seems like you decided to go with the idea that the big bang was the origin of time and space. That seems to create a problem with your P4. though lik...
August 07, 2017 at 23:59
I'm having trouble reading your argument, since I don't see how your premises are all related to one another (in the sense that they all should point ...
August 07, 2017 at 17:16
So which one are you rejecting here? Seems like the former, but if that is the case, then I still don't understand where the assertion that some thing...
August 01, 2017 at 16:29
Not sure I am getting the connection between things that expand from us at a speed faster than light and them not existing. Sure they won't ever inter...
August 01, 2017 at 14:03