You are viewing the historical archive of The Philosophy Forum.
For current discussions, visit the live forum.
Go to live forum

T_Clark

Comments

About a year ago, a poster suggested we develop technologies so that men were no longer needed. Women would be fertilized technologically. Then steps ...
March 28, 2019 at 18:09
As I said in a previous post, the OP isn't about why men are the way they are, it's about whether it means women are better than men.
March 28, 2019 at 18:00
How well do you know @"Bitter Crank"? Of course he's trying to start of fight.
March 28, 2019 at 17:58
I thought he did a good job of explaining. Also, the OP wasn't asking why more men are in prison than women. It asked whether the fact that more men w...
March 28, 2019 at 17:57
I sense a connection with your current "Unconditional Love" thread. Now, what does "socially superior" mean? Do you mean you think maybe women are nic...
March 28, 2019 at 15:55
A lot of people here have been at it for a long time. We really care about what we are saying. Some of us are really smart. Being on the forum is a go...
March 28, 2019 at 05:08
I'm a bit sheepish doing this, but I wanted you to see why I'm so passionate about this. How important it is to me. And not just me. Lots of other peo...
March 28, 2019 at 04:58
Thank you.
March 28, 2019 at 00:58
I don't care that you are 30 and live with your mother. My youngest child, 29, lives at home with my wife and me and we're happy to have him here. But...
March 27, 2019 at 23:10
I'm comfortable using my own judgment to decide what writing, food, music, art, etc. I like and I'm interested in. It's clear you are too. So what's t...
March 27, 2019 at 23:02
Not sure if you are agreeing with me, disagreeing, or neither. The trouble with saying that science is about facts is that it means you are unaware th...
March 27, 2019 at 21:36
The truly basic questions in philosophy are not matters of fact. They are matters of opinion. Not truth, but usefulness. "Metaphysics" is a dangerous ...
March 27, 2019 at 20:19
Please ignore this question if it's too personal - What does your brother think? I don't have much patience with the antinatalist's ideas or justifica...
March 27, 2019 at 17:17
I will respond. Hopefully later today.
March 27, 2019 at 15:58
There have been many discussions of antinatalism here on the forum. @"schopenhauer1" is one of it's prime proponents. I'm sure he'll have thoughts.
March 27, 2019 at 15:56
It looks like @"S" to me. It's a miracle.
March 26, 2019 at 21:46
As I said, I think it's my responsibility as a turd in the swimming pool to express myself more clearly. I think I've gone as far as I can in this thr...
March 26, 2019 at 21:43
Do you mean: Bolding #1: From my point of view good wording. Bolding #2: As I understand it, good wording. Bolding #3: In my personal opinion, oh, my.
March 26, 2019 at 21:36
I have been. I don't doubt that you have also. We've both been repeating the same arguments, going around in circles. In my experience, if posters hav...
March 26, 2019 at 21:03
Of course you looked after him. You're a good person. You care about him. It was the right thing to do. Now it's your responsibility to make sure you'...
March 26, 2019 at 20:52
https://thephilosophyforum.com/discussion/comment/269170
March 26, 2019 at 20:32
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Cs4Gj7JsET4
March 26, 2019 at 20:09
Yes, what you've written is correct. Please do remember.
March 26, 2019 at 19:20
Well, I have no desire to live forever, even if it were possible, which it is not (he said smugly). On the other hand, I have a fondness for quixotic ...
March 26, 2019 at 18:05
Here's a quote from Emerson's Self-Reliance. I try to use quotes from S-R at least twice a week:
March 26, 2019 at 18:02
I was using the term "cognitive science" as it is often used, to denote the study of human behavior through the lens of new technologies such as CAT, ...
March 26, 2019 at 17:56
Yeah, I don't really like the way that came out either. I've filled this space a couple of times with clarifications then erase them. Now I've come to...
March 26, 2019 at 01:56
@"Buxtebuddha" used to call me "Clarkie." (a tear), although, as you can see, he used to spell it correctly.
March 26, 2019 at 01:50
This is not correct. Science and scientists try to discredit the idea of the mind in a number of ways: There is a school of psychology, behaviorism, w...
March 26, 2019 at 01:43
That's what you wrote, but what you really wanted to write is: We're not getting anywhere.
March 25, 2019 at 20:41
I'm sure you can prove it to your own satisfaction, but I'm even surer that you won't be able to prove it to mine. I'd be happy to give you a shot. We...
March 25, 2019 at 20:38
I use "god" because I believe that what I call the experience of god is closely related to a belief in god. There is an experience which many people h...
March 25, 2019 at 20:15
Let me see if I've got this right. Just as a hypothetical, a completely made up example, if someone were to say That would be a circumstantial ad homi...
March 25, 2019 at 18:55
As long as you laugh at my jokes and not my philosophy.
March 25, 2019 at 18:15
Circumstantial ad hominem? What the hell is that? An ad hominem is "an argument directed against a person rather than the position they are maintainin...
March 25, 2019 at 18:13
When hell freezes over is "the moment that accept claim." I'll never convince you. You don't have to convince me of the value of science and rationali...
March 25, 2019 at 05:43
It's not a matter of preference. You need them both in order to do anything, at least anything scientific.
March 25, 2019 at 03:20
I strongly agree with you here. Wait, no I don't. Yikes, I can't tell whether I agree with you or not. You use words that sound like something I might...
March 25, 2019 at 02:37
Boy, your experience is different from mine. I think maybe your term "external world" is the give away. For most of the scientifically inclined, the e...
March 25, 2019 at 02:23
It is my understanding that the Boltzmann Brain concept is taken seriously by some non-goofy scientists.
March 24, 2019 at 22:59
I don't think that's true. I think most scientists, and many others, believe that science provides a privileged viewpoint of the true nature of realit...
March 24, 2019 at 22:54
Have you ever heard of a Boltzmann Brain? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Boltzmann_brain The argument Boltzmann made is pretty much the same as the arg...
March 24, 2019 at 22:45
No, of course I don't mind you "jumping in." "There is no objective reality" is a statement about objective reality in the same sense that "There is n...
March 24, 2019 at 22:39
I understand the distinction, and I don't even have an argument with it as far as it goes. As you say, "Science presumes an external objective univers...
March 24, 2019 at 22:27
I'll stand behind my judgment. I'm with @"ZhouBoTong", whatever crap I say is good is good. "Transformers" is better than "Hamlet." Big Macs are bette...
March 24, 2019 at 22:01
I don't want to play word games and I'm not trying to be tricky. One of the definitions of "apprehension" is "understanding." So, pre-apprehension wou...
March 24, 2019 at 21:02
In another thread, you and I were discussing Rahner's pre-apprehension as something similar to what I was calling an awareness of god. To me, that is ...
March 24, 2019 at 20:45
I disagree. There are no facts independent of values. Values tell us how to split up the world in a way that makes sense to humans. Values are related...
March 24, 2019 at 20:32
Pseudo-significant SNL references: "Never mind." - Gilda Radner as Emily Latella "It's always something." - Gilda Radner as Rosanne Rosanadana Bass-o-...
March 24, 2019 at 19:19
Correct. The segment was called "Count, Pointer Count." Without looking at the web, what was that segment a pop culture reference to?
March 24, 2019 at 18:13