Additionally, if we were pure intellects discussing the equations of quantum physics, it would be unlikely that we'd posit the existence of a macro wo...
There may not even be a wave function to collapse. Pilot wave theory, for example, is fully deterministic formulation of Quantum mechanics. Determinis...
https://images.theconversation.com/files/172440/original/file-20170606-3681-1kf3xwv.jpg?ixlib=rb-1.1.0&q=45&auto=format&w=1000&fit=clip Indeed a graph...
It's now in vogue to say "measurement" than "observation", but that seems more to do with new age spiritualists wildly speculating in a word salad of ...
You bother to posit some factoid as "real truth", or such is the implication, completely ignoring the issue has already been discussed. I bother to po...
It would not be "literally WWIII"; I spend some effort to explain how a "tough" standoff could result in a diplomatic solution. Maybe actually read wh...
There's no reason to assume blackholes are singularities to begin with. It's a common view in physics that a theory of quantum gravity would explain h...
It is realistic, it's exactly what the Cuban Missile crisis was, which no one really criticises US decisions about. And, I explain that Ukraine in NAT...
Realism has nothing to do with: Which I have not argued. I asked: what about the US bombing the Iraqi's (and plenty others) with exactly analogous or ...
Once the war started, Ukraine made lot's of strategic and tactical choices to maximise suffering of it's own people, essentially holding them hostage ...
I will go back and quote myself outlining again and again my position, but for now I will just summarise it again. My first priority is to avoid death...
I believe the logic is that the whole narrative of fighting a war without actually fighting it, only makes sense if there's at least the suffering par...
Again, supporting NATO supporting Ukraine's war effort, is supporting Ukraine's war effort. Support is support, regardless of the justification and re...
That's clearly pro war. Why call it something different? Supporting NATO supporting the Ukrainian war effort ... is clearly supporting the Ukrainian w...
This seems to me clearly a pro-war position. And, at the start of a conflict with Russia as a smaller nation, I would agree with fighting. I have trai...
So NATO should support war with supplying arms ... but that's not a case for war? Lot's of wars are considered by nearly all just wars, certainly most...
I'm aware of this, that's why I also mentioned the non-EU pipelines (mainly China but there's also some capacity to sell south ... of course so those ...
Already done. Fortunately, it's not so inconvenient as trawling through 300 pages. You can click on a posters name, then click on "comments" and get t...
By an essentially random search through your comments, in literally 1 minute: Seems pretty strong support for the war ... and that it's well worth the...
You've clearly argued that Ukrainians should fight, which is the case for war. Without Ukrainians fighting there is no war. Of course, you can blame t...
Sure that's true. I was referring to facebook, twitter et. al. People who virtue signal here don't seem to stick around; they go back to fishing for l...
This is not some sort of safe space for your ego, where your arguments and intentions should be protected from scrutiny. "Arguing" against your positi...
I really don't think we are. You're saying modifying business as usual is some comparable inherent risk to modifying the earth's atmosphere, that is p...
What is the something that it tells? Sure, many people don't care about any war, participated in discussing this one to jump on the social media virtu...
Doing nothing would be not-modifying the earth's atmosphere. Modifying the earth's atmosphere is called radical intervention in the earth-life system....
This is called false equivalence and is just more propaganda. Modifying the composition of the earth's atmosphere is high risk. Not-modifying it is lo...
Are you talking about your own comments? I don't see why people would be surprised that the subject of an ongoing war isn't in the framework of the us...
Pretty accurate description of the massive forest fires (in particular in rain forests that are evolved without fire as it's usually too wet: see key ...
For those interested in actual science: This recent article summarises the "bleak" position and reason it's important to accept: This is the best most...
Although, I didn't participate in the new thread, I don't think it's fair to say those that went and demonstrated the absurdity of the ice age in a fe...
Most of your statements are not even purporting to be facts, and the one's that are you do not support with any evidence, and the one statement you ci...
As has been explained to you in your thread complaining about the moderation, throwing out a scientific fact that has no relevance to the discussion (...
You provided one citation of an article investigating the natural 100 000 year cycle (in the past) and the mechanism of glacial retreat, which does no...
That's what you're statements, like an ice age is expected in the next few hundred years, imply. Your whole current argument is that there is some dou...
Where we disagree is that you claim this natural pattern will continue anyways, or there is some serious doubt as to the effect of our CO2 emissions: ...
What failed verification is this: Which neither you nor I are claiming. We both agree that the planet would normally be heading towards reglatiation (...
Maybe cite what you're talking about, but I'm happy to do it for you: The statement you cite (I assume ... because you don't actually cite it) that "f...
The article you linked to in no way supports your claim that reglaciation will start in a few centuries. The article also in no way contradicts the wi...
I've explained at some length the idea of "supporting your conclusions". Like, how is Wikipedia wrong on this point, what's the errors in the analysis...
Can you cite one climate model predicting an ice age in a few centuries? Did you even bothering reading the second paragraph of wikipedia entry on "ic...
It's not a different topic if it's happening in the next few centuries and there's nothing to worry about ... except starting to move our Northern mos...
You've been making statements like: Climatologists are observing glaciers melting and predicting more melting, where are the climatologists predicting...
You're the one arguing we'll stay in an ice-age ... because we're in an ice-age. That natural cycles, like the next glaciation, will happen for some r...
So how does that square with the earth's biosphere is "self correcting"? And, again, assuming you're aware outcomes increase in severity with the warm...
If we did not change the composition of the earth's atmosphere. I literally just cited the wikipedia article on "Ice age" explaining this, that we hav...
That's not a negative feedback loop that keeps the system stable, which is the issue: stability. Negative feedback loop, connotes a a feedback mechani...
You present yourself as "knowledgeable" about ice-ages ... but have not even bothered to read the second paragraph of the wikipedia entry "ice age": W...
These are not negative feeback loops. The greenification of the Antarctic would be a massive change the the earth-life-system. Eventually the CO2 will...
Comments