You are viewing the historical archive of The Philosophy Forum.
For current discussions, visit the live forum.
Go to live forum

invizzy

Comments

But it could be a demon. And that is an important point.
December 27, 2015 at 07:16
Good question, could be a demon putting the thought in our head, we simply don't know. There is no access to the real world, you see. But presumably t...
December 27, 2015 at 06:56
Yeah but I'm saying a and b are called red because they are THOUGHT of as red. That's how conceptualism works. And if c is not thought of as red it wo...
December 26, 2015 at 22:44
I don't see a problem here, surely red is applied if something is thought of as red.
December 26, 2015 at 11:15
Awesome, thanks. Might be useful to have titles as well as just links though :)
December 22, 2015 at 16:03
How about "The Intentionality of Intention and Action" by John Searle? onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1207/s15516709cog0401_3/pdf
December 22, 2015 at 11:21
Oh I see. Well an Idealist would say EVERYTHING is thought (or at least all that is known is thought) which would solve that problem, wouldn't it?
December 22, 2015 at 09:53
Right but I'm saying universals don't exist. We just have a THOUGHT of redness.
December 22, 2015 at 08:59
Why do we need to account for the concepts? Can't we dismiss them as false if we reject platonism? We can have false concepts right?
December 22, 2015 at 07:35
Just swap hemispheres every 6 months and you'll get endless sun! Some regions in Australia look like like they may be in the middle of very warm summe...
December 22, 2015 at 05:35
How exciting! Is that a first for you, or you've seen snow at Christmas before?
December 22, 2015 at 04:53
Does anyone here live in an area where a white Christmas is possible?
December 22, 2015 at 03:28
I don't think there is much of a problem with universals if we accept a version of 'conceptualism': If everything is a thought I'm not sure you run in...
December 22, 2015 at 03:10
Not relevant you think?
December 20, 2015 at 00:11
Ah this is a common misconception. There are n + s conditions for both, and they are different. We need to analyse both conditions of description as w...
December 19, 2015 at 06:21
Excellent point, well written.
November 14, 2015 at 03:15
So a theory of evolutionary biology is actually pretty complete when it comes to astronomical bodies. I assume that a necessary condition for biologic...
November 11, 2015 at 15:43
It is about meaning isn't it?
November 11, 2015 at 15:24
Mmm, I don't think it is ABOUT astronomical bodies though.
November 11, 2015 at 15:21
I'm not sure this is true. To be honest I'm not sure we can even make sense of a 'partial theory'. Theories that don't explain things (and obviously '...
November 11, 2015 at 11:58
Why not though? That's my point. A theory of gravity attempts to explain gravity for all things, for example. Partial theories are dubious theories if...
November 10, 2015 at 14:07
But that's the goal, isn't? A full account of meaning. I can't conceive of how how a theory of meaning for truth-conditionals can fit into such an acc...
November 10, 2015 at 11:58
Yeah you're right @"mcdoodle" the theory is VERY wanting. Minimal explanatory power. Does it have many adherents? Seems hugely problematic.
November 09, 2015 at 11:41
I recommend reading the SEP entry on Davidson in conjunction with this paper, otherwise it can be a bit tricky to understand what's going on. Well. I ...
November 08, 2015 at 15:32
Perhaps you are technically correct. Is there another word for learning meanings in the way I suggest?
November 02, 2015 at 11:44
By listening to examples of things that speakers say we 'ought not' do (like stabbing people with knives) and inferring based on knowledge of speakers...
November 02, 2015 at 11:27
By listening to how people use the word obligation, determining the similarities in the things called obligations and using that rule when we ourselve...
November 02, 2015 at 11:09
I don't think I am making a distinction in my theory though. Can you see that? Can you elaborate on this? What are you saying here? You seem to be agr...
November 02, 2015 at 11:04
Yeah the guy on the floor is a great one.
November 02, 2015 at 10:13
In: Bad Art  — view comment
We can absolutely theorise about a Mona Lisa of another kind. I think Goodman proposed this thought experiment (and Danto wrote about this too I think...
November 02, 2015 at 10:11
OK, like I say, meaning is an idea. What is an idea though? Simply a mental grouping, a type of thought articulated by a rule/necessary and sufficient...
November 02, 2015 at 08:42
No worries, they're nice. How long have you been doing photography? How old are these ones?
November 02, 2015 at 07:40
Can you tell us more about these Baden? Is your creation the photographs or are these installations/other works?
November 02, 2015 at 07:23
I'm also unsure whether I want to, or should, overcome my prejudices. The world of philosophy is a big place and with some reliability can say the vas...
November 02, 2015 at 07:19
In: Bad Art  — view comment
Mmm, I'm not sure I would say art is found only in objects which are art. That seems to be some sort of infinite regress, paradox or other weirdness! ...
November 02, 2015 at 07:13
We learn ostensively, learning by examples then constructing a rule (necessary and sufficient conditions) that admits of those examples. Not conscious...
November 02, 2015 at 07:05
Pessimism is tricky if you're using it as a descriptor for a worldview because it such a broad, catch all label. I may be pessimistic about the outcom...
November 02, 2015 at 06:02
Like I say, a solution that doesn't result me in reading a bunch of rubbish. :)
November 02, 2015 at 05:44
One problem is that it takes a pretty special person to read deeply into a philosopher that they think is completely on the wrong track. Personally I ...
November 02, 2015 at 05:27
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1NVOawOXxSA This is a song by a friend of mine about house hunting around the northern suburbs of Melbourne, where we ...
November 02, 2015 at 05:10
In: Bad Art  — view comment
Oh that was easy. So we all know what makes something art but just have trouble articulating it? Do you suggest it is IMPOSSIBLE to articulate?
November 02, 2015 at 04:55
In: Bad Art  — view comment
You maybe don't have to define 'chair' (i.e. articulate its definition) to judge it but you do have to know what a chair is. If you didn't know that a...
November 02, 2015 at 04:39
Hey just checking in. I kinda missed the change over as I was taking a bit of time out from PF, so I might be a bit of a silent member for a little wh...
October 26, 2015 at 16:43