Yes, for now panpsychism is, in my opinion, just a proposal to people to analyze things from another perspective, it is more like an alternative appea...
I've seen this way of thinking in many materialists like Sean Caroll, but what they don't want to admit it's that this is not a matter of gathering mo...
I have exactly the same issue: "maybe i'm missing something here". But to be honest, I think it is more likely the case of defending belief at any cos...
Ok, maybe I've made wrong assumptions, but I cannot simply go around and give explanations for commonsensical things. If one goes to the doctor and sa...
I am sorry but I cannot take that seriously. I truly believe you perfectly know what I and @bert1 are talking about. I truly believe that no explanati...
I am not a native speaker, but by first person experience I mean absolutely any experience one can have. That you were. I think there is no one to con...
So you need to search that on wikipedia and Britannica. Do you have personal experiences? If no, keep searching. As for the rest, I have been polite s...
Ok, let me make it simple. Saying mental processes (moving of atoms inside your brain) is the same with pain for example is like saying a punch in the...
There is good news in this debate: a clear line has been drawn - on one hand, we have materialists reaching their limits and now the only thing they c...
It is exactly my problem with a part of philosophy. It is like an athlete who stops in the middle of the raceand say ''I won! That was the finish line...
I actually agree with you. But apparently, it's just the two of us who believe that. So I personally believe that even if the universe is infinite, yo...
Ok, I respect that, but then there's the issue of what is physical. Is consciousness fundamental, is it part of matter, is it part of the laws of natu...
Not so fast my friend! First of all, observing how things work and not what they are is called science, not materialism, and that I have nothing again...
It is special because materialism cannot explain it. It is fundamentally different from the rest of things. Stating it isn't doesn't mean it isn't. It...
That's the point. No. X#7366$€÷77_÷3663%#%#_77#_6#6# like equations or description of atom movemnts will never explain the "redness" of red. Just get ...
That makes absolutely no difference in terms of the hard problem. See, this is the problem with materialism. They postulate all kind of information th...
It shows that we will be able to find out how consciousness arises, dissapears, and correlates with phisicsl states, it tells nothing about the 1st pe...
Exactly! I am an outsider when it comes to philosophy and ideologies and I can say that I am shocked by the difference between my expectations and rea...
Grounds are an illusion, they don't exist. It's a word invented by you and you don't exist, therefore ''grounds'' doesn't exist. 180 Proof - ''I am no...
It's the ultimate proof for your consciousness. You know, I asked a question on this forum on why so many deny consciousness and many people argued th...
All of them with some success for the easy problem and 0 success on the hard problem. Again, the hard problem has been avoided and even denied, but ul...
Many scientists and philosophers are struggling to show us there are rational scientific physical explanations for everything. Sometimes they provide ...
Yes, but there is one thing: the monkey has to use its hands in a way it won't limit itself to hitting the keyboard in the same patterns over and over...
I don't see it like this. Yes, it is just a theory and it does not claim it is more than that. Even if it has no empirocal evidence yet, it has a stro...
Your argument makes sense and I admit I haven't thought about this so far. Thank you! I think this is a trap! I think panpsychism sees a rock as a non...
Hello, For instance: we can assume there is consciousness at the subatomic level, but it cannot manifest itself unless it is integrated in a more comp...
And your friend was never the same again. :lol: I truly admire your style of being simple in bringing arguments, I am a simple man myself. But sometim...
I see you have had a great debate here. Sorry I've missed it! Let me bring an argument for panpsychism: No, a robot wouldn't have more consciousness t...
But isn't this like saying there is a potential for ''infinite consciousness''? I mean I know about my own existence, I know that there is a huge univ...
Very heavy! And in my opinion this raises the following question: CAN THERE BE CONSCIENCE WITHOUT SENSES? Maybe consciousness is the sense of your exi...
Very complex. So I deduce the following: there is a paradigm shift between humans and animals: from a potential limited to a finite number of concepts...
But nobody insulted. I made a mistake using a term I didn't know it was a slur. I am not native and I really didn't know. Other than that, I think the...
Yes, exactly. If panpsychism is right and consciousness is fundamental, there's no way you could make a basic element unconscious. The only way is to ...
OOOO that was a really strong one! But I don't believe Dennett is denying it, I just believe he wants to convince people there's nothing special about...
Comments