You are viewing the historical archive of The Philosophy Forum.
For current discussions, visit the live forum.
Go to live forum

Eugen

Comments

- ok, but that wouldn't be out of the triangle. I am not necessarily interested in persons but in how the system manages the resources, the laws, the ...
December 12, 2020 at 20:29
It seems to me that your theory has exactly the same issue as materialism: how can you create qualia, experiences, consciousness from ''mundane inform...
November 26, 2020 at 10:41
I also believe that. Moreover, neutral monism does not solve anything, it just hide behind ''something''.
November 22, 2020 at 10:43
Sure, but that doesn't mean intelligent life won't be around
November 21, 2020 at 14:59
Both things actually. E.g., now we have micro and macro, but tomorrow we discover new elements, new dimensions, new realms, etc.. An infinite reality,...
November 19, 2020 at 20:34
So in the end it's all about getting information. But what about understanding it?
November 17, 2020 at 09:40
Your location will remain a mystery hehe
October 30, 2020 at 20:44
But technological/natural evolution won't reach infinity. PS: out of topic, where are you from?
October 30, 2020 at 20:10
Ok, I understand your view, I tend to largely agree with you on God, but I think I would disagree on the evolution part. I think between us and a supe...
October 30, 2020 at 19:43
Ok, I will ask you other simpler things. Do you think evolution will bring us new senses? If yes, can those senses be something that we cannot compreh...
October 30, 2020 at 09:43
I do believe that, but my question isn't about that. It limits to living beings inside the Universe.
October 30, 2020 at 09:25
I don't know. There are some things, like the infinite for example, which we cannot understand. But are there things that we wouldn't even be capable ...
October 29, 2020 at 19:58
I think the same. We sometimes tend to exaggerate the influence of philosophers and ideologies inside the academic world on society. Normal people don...
October 29, 2020 at 11:39
Thank you for your answer! I don't have a definite opinion on that, I might open another OP related to this topic, but I've got 3 issues with this: 1....
October 27, 2020 at 09:29
- But in Hoffman's theory, the hard problem disappears. - I agree, but communication is the result of abstraction. So I guess that the ability of abst...
October 26, 2020 at 22:00
But I am not referring to that. In Hoffman's view, I believe it is a matter of quantity, not quality. For example, in one of his interviews, he said t...
October 26, 2020 at 08:57
I am familiar with Don Hoffman, and I can say that his theory is very bold, but nonetheless, I find it plausible. But in regard to limits, how would m...
October 24, 2020 at 08:11
Maybe new senses will arise? Is this even possible, have we already reached the limit of all possible senses? Are there countless senses or just a few...
October 24, 2020 at 08:08
Alright guys, I see that you mostly disagree with mysterianism. But are there some good arguments for or against this ideology? Reminder: I am not lim...
October 24, 2020 at 07:58
Interesting answer. Sometimes I think that only the fact that we can think of ''there can be an infinite of degrees of knowledge'' is a fundamental di...
October 23, 2020 at 21:00
I read this review, but I am not sure if Gazzaniga would agree with it. I believe he is a bit confusing, because, on one hand, he clearly says that th...
October 06, 2020 at 09:39
Unfortunately, I couldn't read the article. I was referring mainly to his book ''Whose in charge?'', but also to some other articles. At first glance,...
October 05, 2020 at 09:14
But under epiphenomenalism, ''liking'' plays no role. That is what we're arguing against. ))
October 02, 2020 at 18:49
Every time I feel something, I can talk about it. For example, if a sudden pain struck me, I can say ''I am in pain''. Under epiphenomenalism, brain s...
October 02, 2020 at 16:17
Nobody likes epiphenomenalism these days. Poor epi :(
September 15, 2020 at 10:37
I've read the Acquaintance Hypothesis and to be fair, I really don't understand: 1. When matter gets acquainted with consciousness, isn't that produci...
September 09, 2020 at 19:42
I think there are correlations between mental states and what we call physical brain.
September 09, 2020 at 18:37
Action-reaction. But indeed, epiphenomenalists say that mind is not really physical. It's either immaterial (property dualism) or some kind of proto-p...
September 09, 2020 at 14:26
Agree! One of Chalmers' response was ''the acquaintance'' and to be fair, I do not understand it exactly, because this supposed acquaintance seems to ...
September 09, 2020 at 10:59
So far, materialism has unsuccessfully tried to avoid the hard problem. The strongest theories so far are the identity theory and functionalism, both ...
September 09, 2020 at 08:44
By the way, if epiphenomenalism is true, why do we go watch comedy movies at the cinema? I mean, I cannot see any reason to spend resources and precio...
September 09, 2020 at 08:41
Is it because of the huge coincidence between reports and epiphenomenal states? Not only that, but it also looks like a law of nature to feel, for exa...
September 09, 2020 at 08:38
But here's what I still don't understand after a decent amount of research: 1. Why would a zombie report pain? a. where did the zombie have the notion...
September 09, 2020 at 08:28
Thanks!
September 04, 2020 at 07:12
Hmmm... you got me thinking... so the only way I see it in favor of epiphenomenalism in case panpsychism is true is to assume that: 1. atoms have mass...
September 03, 2020 at 16:54
''I suspect'' says more about you than the subject :rofl:
July 20, 2020 at 18:15
:rofl:
July 20, 2020 at 17:28
Let's assume it was an accident indeed, not a purpose of nature. But in order to happen, it must be possible. So I am arguing that the very possibilit...
July 20, 2020 at 10:32
It's a nice OP, you have to admit. Not my best but still...
July 20, 2020 at 10:30
You've raised something interesting hee, but please answer me a question first: the Absolute Infinity you mentioned, if it exists, it also include wha...
July 19, 2020 at 18:23
Sounds very elegant and in my opinion plausible, but being at the beginning of my quest for answers, I also find plausibility in other theories. But I...
July 19, 2020 at 18:20
1. And how can we prove it is an accident? It is just an assumption. 2. Even if it is an accident, the hard problem remains and as long as it remains,...
July 19, 2020 at 17:00
The OP isn't meant to argue the Identity theory. All I am saying is that over time, materialism has come up with all sorts of answers for consciousnes...
July 19, 2020 at 15:58
It totally makes sense to me, but.... But as always, things are complicated! I should open a discussion called ''Why things are so damn complicated!?'...
July 19, 2020 at 06:21
But maybe ''the laws of physics'' are very different in other universes, so different that you'd consider them magic.
July 19, 2020 at 06:08
I didn't say that's the case. I wrote it as a variant. Read 2. And by the way, who decides what's physical, natural and what is not?
July 19, 2020 at 06:04
Interesting, could you please give me more details on that?
July 19, 2020 at 05:45
You are right, but the mainstream ideologies are called materialism and panpsychism, and they are competitors.
July 19, 2020 at 05:39
What you define as supernatural for this universe may be natural in other universes. You were a bit vague with that. The identity theory states that c...
July 19, 2020 at 05:37
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=z27k9_NP4FU
July 18, 2020 at 12:24