You are viewing the historical archive of The Philosophy Forum.
For current discussions, visit the live forum.
Go to live forum

fdrake

Comments

You're right, it does. I think it's more apt to characterise speculative realism by what questions its philosophers ask and how they ask them. I'm und...
June 29, 2020 at 20:58
I don't know how user friendly a description of speculative realism can be. I don't even really think it's a thing; it's more of a perspective that "s...
June 29, 2020 at 20:30
For what they're reacting against; nature is claimed to be construed as nature-under-the-aspect-of-the-norms-of-scientific-discourse, with the critica...
June 29, 2020 at 20:11
My take on it: Post phenomenological realism; a return to emphasising scientific content rather than human discourse. Nature philosophy done by approp...
June 29, 2020 at 19:16
Yes. That is true.
June 29, 2020 at 18:41
I have one? Maybe? If you put all the ideas and all the logical/evidential/semantic relations between them on a page, you'd have a big network. It'd b...
June 29, 2020 at 18:39
The "solve for" operation means you've already put the inverse function of f(y)=k into the mix, its existence is required for that proof to work; that...
June 29, 2020 at 18:25
There're two questions there really. One is: can you define all operations in terms of addition? This is the question of whether you can generate a bu...
June 29, 2020 at 18:21
No idea. Same thing happens on twitch and reddit. Invisible lurkers > Registered Lurkers > Posters.
June 29, 2020 at 17:39
Most community members of most places on the internet are lurkers. This whole site is like a small longform subreddit.
June 29, 2020 at 17:33
We tend to talk about the things people are generally talking about. The times are weird; people talk about the times. We talk about the times. Regard...
June 29, 2020 at 16:00
I don't think they forge them either. You don't need to forge anything to get true statistics that can spin to what you like. The overall number of ca...
June 29, 2020 at 15:29
Oi @"NOS4A2", have you buggered off because you understood a worked example of systemic racism and now want to forget the fact?
June 29, 2020 at 14:13
Except it's not a figure of speech for rhetorical effect, UK Covid statistics are being reported in tabloids in exactly that way and for a clear polit...
June 29, 2020 at 13:43
Do you actually though? I don't mean to say you have a standard philosophical position on the matter, but don't you have conceptual insight/imaginatio...
June 28, 2020 at 19:53
That's the crucial thing though, a supposedly race indifferent algorithm does pick up on real correlations (poverty + nonwhite proportion in neighbour...
June 28, 2020 at 19:42
It would be doing much the same thing if it didn't record the ethnicity of the people "it" samples. It has a tendency to concentrate policing effort b...
June 28, 2020 at 19:33
It's mostly other factors. But the sampling effort is race split. So the system is discriminatory.
June 28, 2020 at 19:25
If you're going to trust me on it since I've studied it: yes. Police go to areas with high crime. Racial profiling makes them "criminal test" people i...
June 28, 2020 at 18:53
Here's a banal and insidious variation on racial profiling. Predictive policing.
June 28, 2020 at 18:35
So even though it doesn't target you by name, it's made explicitly to target you, and then some other people incidentally get effected by it. It is a ...
June 28, 2020 at 18:18
Okay. Now let's say that it's anyone with approximately 3.4k posts who fit the criteria. Still targets you? Still a Nos4a2-ist policy? Even though it'...
June 28, 2020 at 18:08
If there was another person who fit the criteria who wasn't you, would it cease to be made to target you?
June 28, 2020 at 18:02
It doesn't even refer to you. How can it target you?
June 28, 2020 at 17:57
Let's say we started banning Trump supporters with over 3.4k posts who believed that racism is propagated mostly through people categorising others in...
June 28, 2020 at 17:30
I'm done now. Your constant reframing attempts are, as ever, frustrating.
June 28, 2020 at 16:30
All the sensible police/legislative reforms don't explicitly mention race either, but they will help to address the problem... Same thing.
June 28, 2020 at 16:29
They don't need to... Such policies are sold as race neutral, they are not. That a politician can pull an economic policy lever to effect blacks dispr...
June 28, 2020 at 16:23
I don't think so. It takes a remarkable amount of confidence in social norms to believe that the categories of folk psychology are structurally identi...
June 28, 2020 at 16:17
You understood it enough to try and reframe the discussion away from it.
June 28, 2020 at 16:09
:roll:
June 28, 2020 at 16:07
The people you support know systemic racism exists and weaponise it to appeal to American racists. The denial you have of it? Their propaganda and eup...
June 28, 2020 at 16:00
Lee Atwater You're wilfully ignorant.
June 28, 2020 at 15:52
"UK Coronavirus Death Toll Increases by 36 in one of the lowest rises during lockdown" Just keeps going and going...
June 28, 2020 at 15:48
If all you want to do is throw names around, it's pretty childish to dismiss a well researched body of work when you've not put in even a little effor...
June 28, 2020 at 14:31
If someone claims that first person events are identical to neural events then... For them there is no resultant "output state" corresponding to our f...
June 28, 2020 at 14:22
Maybe it will seem less ridiculous, or you'll have stronger reasons for rejecting eliminitave materialism after reading this.
June 28, 2020 at 14:10
In: Bannings  — view comment
I'm sorry, I didn't think about it in that way. You didn't get them banned, it was their post history. Enough of us agreed to ban and no one registere...
June 27, 2020 at 20:46
In: Bannings  — view comment
I think it's better explained by most of the staff eye rolling at god discussions, they're extremely tedious to moderate for the same reasons as they'...
June 27, 2020 at 17:53
What is it about selectively reporting almost exclusively favourable sounding out of context statistics to support a political agenda, despite the rea...
June 27, 2020 at 17:46
Thank you very much for the references.
June 27, 2020 at 17:04
In: Bannings  — view comment
It didn't, it's nice to have to explain decisions. If we fuck something up really bad you lot will probably notice.
June 27, 2020 at 16:21
In: Bannings  — view comment
Everyone low quality posts sometimes. Some people low quality post all the time. Gnostic's post history, from what I've read of it, is almost all low ...
June 27, 2020 at 16:06
In: Bannings  — view comment
A long post history of low quality is good evidence that a warning is not useful.
June 27, 2020 at 15:52
In: Bannings  — view comment
Nope.
June 27, 2020 at 15:42
In: Bannings  — view comment
Banned @"Gnostic Christian Bishop" for low quality, after @"Kenosha Kid", @"Banno"@"Wayfarer" brought their track record to mod attention.
June 27, 2020 at 14:13
The UK right wing rags are doing crap like "Lowest Friday increase in deaths since...", it's some real Animal Farm shit.
June 26, 2020 at 23:08
Isn't clothing dipped in a semiotics of racialisation anyway? I mean in the UK, there's the "hoody" archetype, which is inches away from the racist na...
June 26, 2020 at 22:53