You are viewing the historical archive of The Philosophy Forum.
For current discussions, visit the live forum.
Go to live forum

fdrake

Comments

I would've thought it was more like asking someone who treats the world as 1s and 0s why nothing is essentially 0 or 1. If you can't say how you can t...
March 27, 2025 at 14:00
Alright. Can you tell me some things that go into the archetypes?
March 27, 2025 at 13:29
Alright. How do you tell which properties go in the archetype and which don't? @"unenlightened"'s stepped up. Yeah. You kinda just have to eyeball it ...
March 27, 2025 at 12:42
I don't know how to interpret what you're saying at all then. Archetypes are universal patterns that behave as the essence of what they're archetypes ...
March 27, 2025 at 12:04
A definitive answer set in stone is precisely what an essence, a cosmic archetype, is.
March 27, 2025 at 10:43
That's extremely vibes based for the distillation of cosmic archetypes.
March 27, 2025 at 08:55
That is not quite what I meant. How do you tell which properties go into the essence of masculinity and femininity and which don't?
March 27, 2025 at 08:14
No. But I think it makes sense to be able to provide one, if you've got an account of masculinity or femininity. Like why do the gals go for sushi and...
March 27, 2025 at 07:21
I'd call the account non-mystical if it tried to come up with an answer to why the things which count as masculine or feminine count as such. eg, skir...
March 27, 2025 at 06:17
I wasn't expecting something so unapologetically mystical, thanks.
March 26, 2025 at 08:52
Interesting. I would like to hear what you think the correctness conditions for a trait being masculine or feminine are then? Like if I throw you the ...
March 26, 2025 at 06:44
For whom? Some people absolutely love Musk - see him as Tesla or Tony Stark. People love Trump - see him as a paladin. Some people even still love Tat...
March 25, 2025 at 16:18
Good good. They feel at a breaking point right now. But they have for a decade. Nah. I've got a plenty healthy conception of masculinity. I know what ...
March 25, 2025 at 15:31
It shows and they do. I've always gotten a lot from reading your posts. I think of you as much more of a gadfly than a systems builder. Good! Yeah thi...
March 25, 2025 at 11:49
I don't think they're incoherent, they're just unsystematic. I think you've put a lot of ideas into a very small space.
March 25, 2025 at 11:00
I wish the humanities were full of commies.
March 25, 2025 at 10:49
Yeah I agree with @"Jamal"'s comment. It's a long way from psychological angle you took though right? I'm mostly reacting to "Men are pitiful", it doe...
March 25, 2025 at 09:45
Did you always think like this?
March 25, 2025 at 09:08
I think she's fine.
March 25, 2025 at 02:04
I broadly agree. I wouldn't want to call it "wokeness" in public, since that well's poisoned. I have no idea what else to call it though. I see it as ...
March 25, 2025 at 01:21
In case this was sincere - no one would think “women are taking over and are destroying the core of masculinity” as anything but that projection-disav...
March 24, 2025 at 20:26
IMO noting persistent disparities in how genders are treated reveals what norms regarding them are. That's where I'm coming from anyway. The specific ...
March 24, 2025 at 07:11
Yes, and why men face significantly harsher sentences for the same crime.
March 24, 2025 at 04:33
Well taken. For something like income I'd agree. That proceeded from inequality to {now} relative equality within the same role. What I'm thinking of ...
March 24, 2025 at 04:07
That's very well put. Yes. I think at the higher studies level we're at the point where similar incentive structures that were made for women in STEM ...
March 24, 2025 at 03:14
In: Bannings  — view comment
He hoped for a future without women. It is not the exact same thing. The difference doesn't matter much. The state of public discourse matters unfortu...
March 23, 2025 at 13:46
I read Hunchback this morning. Cosy. Simple prose. Rare to find plain descriptions of disabled people's sexualities.
March 23, 2025 at 12:52
It was entrapment
March 23, 2025 at 12:50
In: Bannings  — view comment
Imo the one where he hoped every woman would die
March 23, 2025 at 12:44
Admittedly @"Gregory" lowered the tone into the usual gender war bullshit, but I expect better of the rest of you.
March 23, 2025 at 07:13
I provided an even handed discussion of the positives of total bum excision, I don't know what else you wanted. I might be able to intuit what you wou...
March 23, 2025 at 05:42
Ye olde incidental half humanity death, I see.
March 23, 2025 at 04:13
Why're you gonna hope for glassing the half of humanity you could be romantically attracted to. It sounds quite counterproductive. The authors of some...
March 23, 2025 at 04:01
Jesus H Christ Gregory. If I may ask, are you heterosexual?
March 22, 2025 at 22:51
They call this diversifying the oesophageal portfolio, I see your tail is very hedged, sir.
March 22, 2025 at 21:22
I imagine you charge $150 an hour.
March 22, 2025 at 17:37
My faith's only ever been rewarded when I do something about it.
March 22, 2025 at 17:31
My brother in Christ Denmark has opinions about Greenland and every European country is in hybrid warfare with Russia.
March 22, 2025 at 17:22
Yes, and the considerable reduction in swamp ass from the global bumectomy seals the deal. My guy needs to get on this ASAP.
March 22, 2025 at 15:43
People destroying Teslas is analogous to a big spat of people destroying electric bikes that we had in Europe. That was absolutely not treated as a th...
March 22, 2025 at 08:29
Every person would be a little lighter with no bum, meaning we'd need less calories. That could mean less production of food is required on a global l...
March 22, 2025 at 07:21
Have you considered all the ways that humanity could be improved by cutting our own bums off? Sounds like denial to me.
March 22, 2025 at 00:02
https://www.latintimes.com/anti-vaxx-mom-whose-daughter-died-measles-says-disease-wasnt-that-bad-578871 On topic I suppose. Compare Harold Camping's d...
March 21, 2025 at 18:33
I suppose it would depend on if the nearest possible world without the underwear itchiness was also a world in which they were still together. Not tha...
March 21, 2025 at 14:58
I'm sure if you looked at it from the perspective of the values that might cause someone to adopt a particular stance, you'd find some commonality wit...
March 21, 2025 at 14:28
I suppose there's a couple of types of content involved. If you established that X causes Y through an experiment, then that's an excellent justificat...
March 20, 2025 at 22:34
If they are, it will be due to the sheer incompetence of the Republican party. The party's goals and priorities are clear.
March 20, 2025 at 21:42
At this point anyone who's still supporting the Republican party ought be considered in the same light as an outright supporter of a fascist regime.
March 20, 2025 at 17:57
I'm going on my own hobby horse here, rather than trying to do any exegesis. I think generally people accept narratives as reasons. Since they serve a...
March 20, 2025 at 16:52
I have no idea. If you're just estimating the mean of a data set, sample size 19 and 20 are basically the same thing. It would be really hard to justi...
March 19, 2025 at 16:44