You are viewing the historical archive of The Philosophy Forum.
For current discussions, visit the live forum.
Go to live forum

Pneumenon

Comments

Where is space? It doesn't appear to have a location, so it must not exist. X-)
January 19, 2017 at 05:03
Earlier on, I said this: I see a red triangle. Upon seeing it, I form the belief, "I am currently having the experience of seeing a red triangle." Wha...
January 18, 2017 at 05:16
"That seeming led me to believe that I had that same seeming." I could question this claim, but, if it's true, then the belief (that I had that seemin...
January 16, 2017 at 06:44
Okay, I'm gonna conjecture a little hypothetical that might illustrate Sellars' intuition on this matter. I'm gonna ramble a little, but I'm still in ...
January 16, 2017 at 06:31
Right, it occurred to me after typing that that I may have fallen into the exact same error as Sellars. Let me look a little further into this... You ...
January 16, 2017 at 06:12
Here, I'll take a swing at it. I think Sellars means something like this: "I had experience x." "I had experience x, and it was veridical." If the for...
January 16, 2017 at 05:58
So, ontological holism, ontic pragmatism. I can accept this, or some flavor of it, provided it still allows the possibility of philosophy (not a big f...
January 15, 2017 at 22:56
I think that two people can share a motive. That's why we can cooperate. And if you're certain that you don't share a motive with someone else, trying...
January 15, 2017 at 22:43
Good! I think we've gotten deeper into the part of your thinking that interests me. You appear to believe that such activity is pointless, but you fre...
January 15, 2017 at 19:40
Augustino, I sense a tension in your thinking here, inasmuch as there seems to be some fracture (which every philosopher has). I want to try and diagn...
January 15, 2017 at 19:17
Yeah, but we have to cooperate in groups, and any group that cooperates needs a collective "why" if it's gonna function over the long term. More impor...
January 15, 2017 at 18:56
Not to be the bearer of bad news, but this is where the bare swearing about bears and werebears is barely something I want barreling down on me, even ...
January 07, 2017 at 19:46
Plato. The rest of them try to escape him and fail.
December 30, 2016 at 22:31
A statement is only true about the world if the world is a certain way, and thus depends on the world. "The world contains elephants" is true iff ther...
December 25, 2016 at 06:01
Ah! So was that sentence appropriate because it would eventually translate into the English "The sun rises in the East," or for some other reason? Als...
December 24, 2016 at 20:36
Ok. So how do you put sentences into a world? Truth appears not only to be mind-dependent, but linguistically-capable-mind-dependent. In that case: pr...
December 24, 2016 at 19:59
No dice. Does the paper have words on it or not? Keep in mind that we want to know if there are sentences in a world here. How do you put sentences in...
December 24, 2016 at 16:48
So, let's take it a little further. Two more statements: R1: "If there were no minds, there would be no truths." R2 "If there are no minds, then there...
December 24, 2016 at 03:57
I suppose you could say that Q would not be true if there were no minds, since there would be no truths. But now we've got these two statements: Q1: "...
December 24, 2016 at 03:44
Q = "There are no truths." Would Q be true, in the absence of minds? This isn't a recoil argument. I want to look at the relationship between counterf...
December 24, 2016 at 03:40
I'm not filled with suffering or sadness. I'm too busy expanding my base in Factorio. Have you ever thought, when seeing one of those starving child i...
December 22, 2016 at 08:32
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DR01YdFtWFI&t=15s
December 19, 2016 at 01:50
Maybe I'm just not getting it, but it seems as if you're just saying that we ought to define our terms first. Fair enough, but is there a kind of subs...
December 01, 2016 at 14:49
Quick question: if realism and idealism are secondary, what are the primary questions that generate them?
December 01, 2016 at 13:30
It's a signal. Rather than saying, "The father gets mad because his daughter keeps asking 'why'," I once heard a philosophy professor say, "The father...
November 24, 2016 at 15:08
Strawman.
November 07, 2016 at 22:43
Had the female soccer team been rating the men, what would the appropriate response have been? I can already anticipate the answer to this - "Only the...
November 07, 2016 at 21:34
Perfect.
October 08, 2016 at 18:44
I have a tree branch you can use. By which I mean MY PENIS.
October 08, 2016 at 01:53
One thing that tangles me up when thinking about other minds is that the whole question seems to assume that my experience of my own mind is unproblem...
September 24, 2016 at 20:59
If what the ascetic is doing is insulting, it still isn't objectionable in any significant sense. "This guy doesn't like hamburgers - I bet he thinks ...
September 24, 2016 at 03:35
Your statement was not qualified, so neither is my question.
September 18, 2016 at 06:53
What is the difference between this and a simple refusal to criticize feminism?
September 17, 2016 at 17:14
Beethoven's Grosse Fuge is mind-opening - better than drugs for that purpose. Music is a higher revelation than philosophy. Also, I think that metal i...
September 16, 2016 at 22:14
Transcendental, beeyotch.
September 16, 2016 at 22:11
The existence of abstracta. Are numbers real? How about universals like green and scarlet? Are tokens fundamental, or is there such a thing as a type?...
September 16, 2016 at 21:17
Ad hominems and motte-and-bailey arguments are the bread-and-butter of the social justice movement. Sanctimony is liberally applied in both cases.
September 12, 2016 at 21:34
So far, this exchange has looked like this: Me: "The social justice movement is composed of people who want to increase their own social status by adv...
September 12, 2016 at 09:48
If the door price is undergoing a lot of irrelevant posturing, then maybe the people in question are not worth speaking with.
September 11, 2016 at 22:53
Classical liberals can do whatever they want. I'm not particularly concerned with their philosophy. Your use of "classical liberal masses" is noted, h...
September 11, 2016 at 22:51
This is what I was talking about in my last post, about how the social justice movement is just about increasing one's status. Expounding the virtuous...
September 11, 2016 at 17:04
On the button. I add that the frequent appeals to "subconscious" biases and behaviors is rather convenient, rhetorically speaking.
September 10, 2016 at 00:12
Much of what humans do - the majority, in fact - consists of a game where they seek social status while pretending to do other things. The "social jus...
September 09, 2016 at 01:35
I would gladly do Word and Object. I have not read it, but I have a passing acquaintance with Quine that ought to be deeper.
September 06, 2016 at 21:56
Frege's On Sense and Reference would be good. I'd also be interested in anything else in a similar vein.
September 06, 2016 at 02:07
You seem to be wavering between "abandoning as purveyor/seeker of universal truth" and "becoming conscious of it ." Do you want to "abandon" the pursu...
September 06, 2016 at 01:58
Well, then I don't see any need to adopt it. Suit yourself. EDIT: although I have to ask - what's so radical about adding another tool to your toolbox...
September 05, 2016 at 22:39
If the utility of your pragmatism is not universal, then there is a limit on how radical your pragmatism can be.
September 05, 2016 at 21:51
We should certainly be self-questioning about our motives for doing things. And one can always ask what good it is to be radically pragmatic...
September 05, 2016 at 20:10
I have certainly seen this process in action, but I remark that the final result of the identification-with-truth need not be bleak as the OP seems to...
September 05, 2016 at 18:17