You are viewing the historical archive of The Philosophy Forum.
For current discussions, visit the live forum.
Go to live forum

philorelkook

['Member']Joined: September 25, 2019 at 05:59Last active: December 07, 2019 at 07:351 discussions8 comments

Discussions (1)

Comments

You bring up a few interesting points. For one, you ask, “Why would God need a petitionary prayer from someone in order to initiate those things we as...
December 07, 2019 at 07:44
I’d like to object to premise 1 of your argument. In the final paragraph of your argument, you say that emphasizing Jesus’ words “doesn’t mean we shou...
December 07, 2019 at 07:42
Although I agree with the conclusion of your argument (“if an omnibenevolent God exists, then evil is a necessary side effect”), I disagree with your ...
November 01, 2019 at 05:15
I’d like to respond to your question, “How might one respond to Hume?” I do believe that your reconstruction of the argument and Hume’s objections to ...
November 01, 2019 at 05:12
According to your numbered argument, you conclude that God can do all things, which means that he could even do the logically impossible things, such ...
November 01, 2019 at 04:53
You say, “But they (one “who can do anything logically possible”) do not have as much as one who can also do the logically impossible.” First, I would...
October 01, 2019 at 06:52
I believe you are arguing the following. Let me know if I am wrong. 1. If God does not show himself, then he fears to show himself. 2. God does not sh...
September 25, 2019 at 19:21
In this argument, you state that you are sympathetic to Descartes’ view. The following is Descartes view on the omnipotence of God in a modus ponens a...
September 25, 2019 at 06:02