You are viewing the historical archive of The Philosophy Forum.
For current discussions, visit the live forum.
Go to live forum

Banno

Comments

Well, yes. If your commander gives an order, you are thereby under an obligation, even if you do not follow that order. That's right. When I say "Hell...
June 19, 2025 at 21:45
Yep.
June 19, 2025 at 21:33
Well, you can have some of my stew if you so choose. It's up to you.
June 19, 2025 at 21:25
Instead of addressing the criticism you choose to hide from it with a mere caricature. Not a rational or honourable response.
June 19, 2025 at 21:24
Nice. Do you have thoughts as to how to go about doing this? My first reaction is that of course there need be nothing in common between the various l...
June 19, 2025 at 06:29
You are moving too quickly. You ask the question and then jump to the conclusion. A more careful approach might serve you better. What presumptions do...
June 19, 2025 at 06:26
Very very good. Your explanations of both Wittgenstein and Gödel are clear and crisp. That is, there's an admirable brevity to both, without loss of i...
June 19, 2025 at 05:37
It was a scattershot.
June 19, 2025 at 03:28
Not much to do with utility. Each formal system has it's own definition. Which logic is your account valid in, then? I was using prop calculus. Why ar...
June 19, 2025 at 03:24
@"Count Timothy von Icarus" — maybe we could take a step back. You said you didn’t make use of a “Great List.” But don’t you think there are true stat...
June 19, 2025 at 01:47
This looks to me as if you would avoid the issue rather than address it. I would suppose that we might find a point of agreement at least in preferrin...
June 19, 2025 at 01:32
Ok - but isn't making that distinction an application of logic? So it can't server as the justification for logic...
June 19, 2025 at 01:15
I don't usually read Leon's posts. The last few show why. When faced with a counter argument, he doesn't address the criticism, but instead insults th...
June 19, 2025 at 01:04
, . Very down to earth posts. In my usage, a narrative has a truth value - it sets out how things are, or at least it sets out how they are supposed t...
June 19, 2025 at 00:59
:up:
June 19, 2025 at 00:19
It had me reaching for the antiseptic... to whip down the furniture. Thanks for that. I want to be clear that, in contrast to your much more interesti...
June 19, 2025 at 00:02
Yep.
June 18, 2025 at 22:59
Sure. But that's not all there is going on here. A command also creates of an obligation, a question seeks a reply. That's more than just a transfer o...
June 18, 2025 at 22:51
Thanks for chiming in, with a very Hegelian response, no less. And being Hegelian, of course it's right. I do hope my account is incomplete. Otherwise...
June 18, 2025 at 22:38
Oddly accurate.
June 18, 2025 at 22:30
Nice. I think I see where you would go. And I guess all I can do here is point to the basic liberal principles of accepting the differences that make ...
June 18, 2025 at 22:27
I'm not sure what you mean here. That there could be an end to philosophy, a point where we have finished the Great List of Facts? Perhaps, but I don'...
June 18, 2025 at 22:20
Well, yes. That's why it's brilliant. The simple observation that we can do more than one thing with the words we use. A fair point. Yes, we can say m...
June 18, 2025 at 22:12
Nice. Do dolphins have a language that is so different to ours that we cannot recognise it as such? Good question. I do not know the answer. But you a...
June 18, 2025 at 21:58
I am tempted to go a step further, and suggest that we assume commensurability. That, after all, is what the Principle of Charity implies. You and I a...
June 18, 2025 at 21:45
So you don't think that god knows everything? Or that every statement is either true, or it is false, and hence there is a set of truths, and all othe...
June 18, 2025 at 21:30
Are you happy with that answer, or are you looking for alternative views? Your question, for example, "Where does logic come from?", supposes that log...
June 18, 2025 at 05:08
Some folks don't - perhaps can't - get it Sometimes you have to walk away.
June 18, 2025 at 03:53
Good. I'm pleased with the attention it has garnered. Yes, 'dissection' is pretty much 'analysis' but I went with the former both in order to leave be...
June 18, 2025 at 03:51
Yep. Here's were this line of reasoning spits off from the thread: See if I have this right. I've said "it's not the case that anything goes". You und...
June 18, 2025 at 03:48
, The relation between language games is a central problem here. Feyerabend was all set to do his Doctorate under Wittgenstein, who unfortunately up a...
June 18, 2025 at 01:31
There might be a Scotsman lurking here... At the risk of oversimplifying, best I make explicit that I did not deny having a world view, nor suggest th...
June 18, 2025 at 01:23
Or, perhaps, the solution is not algorithmic.
June 18, 2025 at 01:13
Thanks, . I was writing a longish response, only to have it deleted whiel refreshing multiple windows. Bugger. It was a list of the various points you...
June 18, 2025 at 01:12
Brilliant post. Why is it so hard for some to see that not every statement has assertoric force? Or that a negative statement may have assertoric forc...
June 17, 2025 at 23:56
Indeed. Hegelian rhetoric can be brilliant, as in the mouth of that salivating Slav, Žižek. And our own @"Tobias", of course.
June 17, 2025 at 23:48
Thanks - yes, but that aspect of the OP has been sidelined. I'm intrigued by the apparent way in which criticism of a suggestion is seen as impolite.....
June 17, 2025 at 23:43
Fair. the genesis of analytic philosophy was arguably the rejection of British Hegelianism... all in good keeping with the motion of the Dialectic, of...
June 17, 2025 at 23:38
Well said. Me, too. But I can't say more. :wink:
June 17, 2025 at 23:27
Maths doesn't close itself off in the way I'm suggesting. Consider potential closures: ' 'There can only be one line through a given point that is par...
June 17, 2025 at 23:25
Have you stopped beating your wife? No, I won't answer your question. I made "I have all and only the truth" a claim of hubris. This is not the same a...
June 17, 2025 at 23:04
Bit of a shame your post came at the bottom of a page, as it seems to me to deserve quite a bit of attention. The closure we're talking about is metho...
June 17, 2025 at 22:42
yeah, not a bad reply at all. The whole architecture is authoritarian in form. That style of philosophising is structured to preclude objection. Each ...
June 17, 2025 at 03:37
I agree. Well, sometimes. True. But there's stuff after the Tractatus, and not just from Wittgenstein. The stuff that can't be said can still be evalu...
June 17, 2025 at 02:14
Indeed it is. But we agreed: And your is just such a misreading. Indeed, I gave an example of how truth might work, following Kripke's formal example,...
June 17, 2025 at 01:43
Speaking roughly, it's just myth-making until the critique begins - then it can be doing philosophy.
June 16, 2025 at 23:56
There's whole worlds between what is vacuous and what is determinate. That seems to be our point of difference. Those worlds are were we find the unkn...
June 16, 2025 at 23:23
Love this. On this, at least, we might agree! So where else might we find agreement? How am I reading "determinate content"? I presume you mean someth...
June 16, 2025 at 22:40
:smile: Of course it is. Who else's would you have me recite? :wink:
June 16, 2025 at 22:05
Cheers. Hope the OP is helpful. Oh, to be so lucky! But as you so eloquently say, we do find ourselves putting the pieces of our history together in a...
June 16, 2025 at 22:00