You are viewing the historical archive of The Philosophy Forum.
For current discussions, visit the live forum.
Go to live forum

Banno

Comments

That's a bit convolute. Again, this does not apply only to statements about the future; there are plenty of other sorts of statements which are true a...
January 25, 2018 at 00:58
I rather like the block universe. But as explained above, it's not essential. That we do not know the truth of some statement does not render it neith...
January 25, 2018 at 00:08
That's not right. That we don't know if some statement about the future is true or false does not make it neither true nor false.
January 24, 2018 at 23:50
I don't see how that follows. But either way, that we don't know if some statement about the future is true or false does not make it neither true nor...
January 24, 2018 at 23:31
A broader answer - that we don't know if some statement about the future is true or false does not make it neither true nor false.
January 24, 2018 at 23:27
Meh. Not unless we need to.
January 24, 2018 at 23:08
Yes. So let's go with a block universe.
January 24, 2018 at 23:05
Of course we can. Just wait.
January 24, 2018 at 22:50
I'm puzzled by your puzzlement. Moore holds up his hand. "Here is a hand". What does the "timeless truth really consist in beyond our thinking of it"?...
January 24, 2018 at 22:29
Friends, glad to see you.
January 24, 2018 at 03:04
Might be true. Peirce had a strange affection for triads. Yet another thing that irks. So I am not convinced I want it all. Or any of it. Despite your...
January 24, 2018 at 02:05
AH! Cheers. "The map is not the territory" was a favourite term of mine asa child. I was into General Semantics and all that. And in a way it is true....
January 24, 2018 at 01:38
Ah. found this: http://www.informationphilosopher.com/solutions/scientists/pattee/ (my emphasis) So displacement is where one talks about something in...
January 24, 2018 at 01:13
Take a look at the Pizza thought experiment. http://www.nybooks.com/daily/2017/11/26/the-pizza-thought-experiment/ Might be worth a thread on its own.
January 24, 2018 at 01:09
So I Googled "Pattee Displacement" and got the standard catalogue of American motorcycles. X-) Would someone else here tell me how displacement is bei...
January 24, 2018 at 01:07
You appear to have introduced a technical term - displacement - without telling us how you are using it. Could you please clarify?
January 24, 2018 at 00:46
Yes and yes.
January 24, 2018 at 00:45
Is it really an issue? It's not hard to add time and place; indeed, time and place are implicit in the statement: "the cat is on the chair" is true ri...
January 24, 2018 at 00:43
I don't understand this sentence. Can you clarify?
January 24, 2018 at 00:38
SO add a time and place, if you like.
January 24, 2018 at 00:37
Perhaps. the answer might rest on how we use "manifest". DO you want to set out some details?
January 24, 2018 at 00:36
Well, that's the thesis of the series, so that leaves us nowhere to go.
January 24, 2018 at 00:35
My gut reply would be "no". Private language seems to me logically contradictory, like squaring the circle. There are cases of languages that are priv...
January 24, 2018 at 00:34
I just find that rendering of a simple sentence overly complicated. The phrase "ontically on the chair" does not add anything that is not already in "...
January 24, 2018 at 00:06
@"Sam26" I want to apologise for becoming carried away in @"apokrisis" discussion at the expense of the theme of this thread. When you have time, i wo...
January 23, 2018 at 23:48
Folk think too hard about truth. Saying that the cat is on the chair and saying that "the cat is on the chair" is true amount to much the same thing. ...
January 23, 2018 at 23:46
A source mentioned before. http://www.nybooks.com/topics/on-consciousness/
January 23, 2018 at 22:54
Put so, I'm not sure a thought is ever complete. I'm increasingly intrigued by externalist ideas - the notion that thinking occurs outside of heads. C...
January 23, 2018 at 05:27
Perhaps. The thought was there, but incomplete.
January 23, 2018 at 04:19
Ach. Redirecting. Excellent behaviour management! So what is, is what can be said?
January 23, 2018 at 04:13
Damn. Mum found out.
January 23, 2018 at 04:06
I have one, thanks. Just boiling up some spuds fresh out of the ground, part of my first crop. Plenty more to come. They will be served with fresh her...
January 23, 2018 at 03:37
Sorry - which was it again?
January 23, 2018 at 03:20
Interpretations of what? Interpretation is moving from one language to another, yes? How does interpretation work when we are both speaking English? A...
January 23, 2018 at 03:03
This is very revealing. It shows that Meta does not take the idea of a public language quite far enough. The supposition in the quote above is that th...
January 23, 2018 at 02:32
I've got no idea what an absolutely public language might be. Again, you are far too tricksy for me, Apo.
January 23, 2018 at 02:18
That's it.
January 23, 2018 at 02:16
...or is it that you are still hoping to be in control of the discursive boundaries? Make this a safe space for that guy Apo? Remove the possibility o...
January 23, 2018 at 02:14
Isn't there a puzzle here, if one is able to eff what is ineffable? This is all rather a puzzle. Ride yourself of private items thus: imagine that it ...
January 23, 2018 at 00:13
You do not have to be here. You are welcome to go and spend your time more productively. But you enjoy this.
January 22, 2018 at 23:42
The time wasting is apparently mutual. IF it is all a matter of degree, then there can be no absolutely private language... I think we agree, but you ...
January 22, 2018 at 23:31
I would avoid such talk. Too close to reification; too much.
January 22, 2018 at 23:26
What would sharing it with yourself look like?
January 22, 2018 at 22:45
Private language speaks to the notion that I have private thoughts in my head that I translate into English and put "out there", that you read and the...
January 22, 2018 at 22:45
What? A private language would be one that cannot be made public, even in principle; and there can be no such thing. Where is the contradiction? Why b...
January 22, 2018 at 22:29
Well, I would not say it like that, but yes, I agree.
January 22, 2018 at 21:49
Yep. The difference is that a private language is one that cannot be made public even in principle.
January 22, 2018 at 21:02
Indeed.
January 22, 2018 at 09:12
So what do your replies say about you, Apo?
January 22, 2018 at 09:09