@"3017amen", one of the things that happens to some folk who begin to study a new philosopher is the they will begin to see things from the point of v...
Good- now let's examine the evidence. If every physicist learns that the Third Law of Motion is also called the law of cause and effect, then one woul...
Cause and effect are not directly observable. One might be able to observe a sequence of events, and then to claim that one is the cause, another the ...
Well, no. He used the word "force" to mean force. Force is the product of mass and acceleration. Kinetic energy is, in contrast, half the square of th...
You quoted some stuff about the Laws of Motion. What I am questioning is the connection between this and supposed laws of cause and effect. Your quote...
Maybe. That looks a stretch to me. Look beyond billiard balls and the metaphor of cause and effect breaks down. Given two equal and opossum forces, it...
I don't see how a sausage is irrational. What would be irrational would be to doubt where doubt is incoherent. Banno has coffee, therefore, there is a...
The format of this thread allows @"3017amen" to ignore the posts that answer his questions, so that he repeated himself beyond tedium. There's a forma...
Hm. Eventually the thread drops in to tedium. I've shown you uncaused events. I've agreed with you that there is mystery in the world, and pointed out...
Those who have read my views on epistemology will know how keen I am to distinguish belief from truth. While both are predicated to propositions, they...
Meh. @"3017amen" is arguing in good faith. He may be beginning to realise that his conclusions do not follow from his premises; his argument is no whe...
And it's not because it doesn't work as an explanation... It's that it is far too successful. It explains everything; even stuff that ain't so. So as ...
Crash. Down comes the gate. You deny the conversation any future. So is it really the case that your belief in god relies absolutely on the notion tha...
Yep. The trouble is - as mentioned in the discussion of existentialism elsewhere - we may either follow god or deny him; so god fails as a source of m...
How? Further, doesn't that oblige you to believe in a god who chooses to keep some things hidden from you? Why should he do that? Yes. There are thing...
Well, it's your thread. You put the bits together. So, again, suppose that mathematics confers no evolutionary advantage... is this the third, or four...
Well, no. Atheism is not an explanation so much as the rejection of an incorrect explanation. The notion of a theistic god is not credible. Hence, ath...
I guess I would have liked to see some sort of Bayesian analysis, wherein the probability of god being a believable theory becomes higher after one co...
Why? YOu are a competend user of English; you know what "needs" are. AS for why they exist... again, what could it mean to ask such a question, to pon...
Comments