Banno

...as found in the Bible. Do you eat shellfish?

Thinking of Morning after pill.

Damning yourself with your own words: Keep digging. Explain to us again how women ought behave.

I think so. Analysis of language as use shows the poverty of explicit definition. Consider family resemblance, for instance.

Extraordinary, that you cannot see that what you have written here reeks of misogyny. So I might just leave it here for others to consider when apprai...

I wonder if what you are doing would be better served by modal logic. That is, what are you saying with ?p(p?¬p) that couldn't be said with ?(p?¬p)?

Well, it is not possible according to the formation rules... What occurs after ? is a variable, not a proposition.

Opposition to abortion is immoral. It is immoral because it puts the "needs" of a cyst ahead of those of a human. Pretending a cyst has rights in orde...

Well, yes, it is nasty. It tells of a person who does not respect women; who assigns them their place based on their gender alone, without regard for ...

No, it's what you said: If that's not you, then don't say it.

Persuasive words - well, they persuade. Your writing is ugly, nasty, self-serving bullshit.

So back to my main point:

I find your posts ponderous in the extreme, with no identifiable argument. Furthermore you have expressed a moraly abhorrent disregard for women. I do...

Scooping out your argument, a foetus contains all the data for a fully developed human being. This gives the foetus a thing called potential, that is ...

Calling out this misogynist crap: Women are for having children; any woman who does not wish to bear a child to term is insane; a woman who is not hap...

SO a twelve-year-old rape victim ought not be permitted a neat, convenient abortion?

I was taking your post seriously; but I came to this: That's a pretty pathetic pronouncement, even by your standards. You are not worth the effort, Ha...

Your post was unclear to me. SO I will paraphrase it, below, and you tell me if I have the gist. So sometimes it is OK to kill things. An example is t...

What's that, then?

And eggs and sperm? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fUspLVStPbk

Wouldn't all this just mean that what we mean by being real just is being dreamed by deity 1? Which is to say, this metaphysical dream makes no differ...

Your argument is poorly drawn. Set it out so it can be seen. A blood cell from your veins would be human, but not a human being. It is alive - at what...

That's the trouble with Zombie threads. https://thephilosophyforum.com/discussion/comment/249231 And elsewhere.

:cool:

SO, do tell us more about the ineffable...

But that's not a reason to do bad metaphysics.

Btu there is also nothing to make it necessary...

Now that is so much better than your first post.

Something only you understand?

Sure. I posit that someone who chooses to call themselves "OmniscientNihilist" has a long way to go in understanding them. Tying yourself to a world v...

Mere word play. Especially when you do it wrong.

Quoting authority to excuse your own poor thinking.

Now your words become a muddle. I have nothing in my pocket. I'll give you half of it. And that's what your post - - is. A word muddle.

Look it up. How do you explain my disagreeing wiht you?

AN ad hoc reparation on your part. SO what is the vacuum full of?

How doe you avoid solipsism?

Vacuum state fluctuation is real, and happens everywhere, all the time. I gather this is what @"tim wood" was referring to. Hence the supposition is j...

Not so much. You confuse human beings and human tissue. They are not the very same.

Now, if there were a God, wouldn't it be that sort of thing?

Sure, a neat answer. Considering what must be the case, in order for one to doubt in this way. There must, for instance, be beliefs, however tentative...

Hence, pessimism.

Omnipresence. IF there were a god, wouldn't His presence be utterly overwhelming? This seems to be what many of the devout describe. This in contrast ...

That approach strikes me as deplorable...

There's no arguing with that level of rationality.

The invisible hand, for all its utility, can't help out in the commons.

The imperfectability of Man.

Economics. I set out the only viable solution to the tragedy of the commons in a thread with that name. Trouble is, it's not an economic solution but ...

Yep. I'm thinking of the faith found in the trial of god. There is questioning, even rejection, and yet there is still faith. In that play the argumen...

It's not one church.