You are viewing the historical archive of The Philosophy Forum.
For current discussions, visit the live forum.
Go to live forum

Banno

Comments

Yeah, I was surprised; but you said you could: So, if you can say what it is that is not shared, say it.
February 18, 2021 at 20:07
This is a great topic, because it will always gather a dozen or so folk who insist that there is something about which we cannot speak, and who will d...
February 18, 2021 at 20:05
Just tell me what it is about the Newton's cradle that you cannot tell me, then. It seems that all there is to your account is that One cannot see it ...
February 18, 2021 at 19:58
and...? No one is denying that some things are private.
February 18, 2021 at 19:48
Yeah, I wondered about that.
February 17, 2021 at 20:16
Here you go... See?
February 17, 2021 at 08:06
Good. What 's with the comments about claims? I don't see the import to you. PerhapsIm too tired to follow your line of thought, but you've several ti...
February 17, 2021 at 07:44
Oh, I don't know. It seemed you were pretty clear:
February 17, 2021 at 06:59
Cheers. You talk of a moral sense, but show an antipathy towards Hume. See Sympathy, and the Nature and Origin of the Moral Sentiments
February 17, 2021 at 06:52
I suggest you read the conclusion of the section from which you quote. Arguably, he was a strong agnostic - but he certainly did not
February 17, 2021 at 06:12
February 17, 2021 at 01:51
What's assumed- Commonality? Or a private subjective world?
February 17, 2021 at 01:48
So... what is it about the Newton's cradle that is not shared?
February 17, 2021 at 01:09
Cheers.
February 17, 2021 at 01:09
You say that like it was a bad thing...
February 17, 2021 at 01:08
No, one event from two differing points of view. He turned on the light. He alerted the burglar. Two descriptions of the same event.
February 17, 2021 at 00:44
No. Edit: I'm not keen on explaining Kant's errors again here. He wasn't to know that he was setting philosophy off after wild geese. Care to respond ...
February 17, 2021 at 00:40
So... it's back to we ought socialise the free market of ideas - introduce government controls so that things folk don't want get produced?
February 17, 2021 at 00:31
It's rather that Davidson supposes we can describe the same event i two different ways; I'm in love, and I have high levels of norepinephrine. THis do...
February 17, 2021 at 00:28
No. Hume was an atheist.
February 17, 2021 at 00:22
Thanks for the testimonial. My bit after the bit you quote is of import:
February 17, 2021 at 00:19
Again, talk to the example of Newton's cradle - what is not shared there?
February 17, 2021 at 00:14
Sure. I don't see the relevance. You claim was: My point is that when you feel a pain, there is no place for doubt. Now if you feel a pain in an amput...
February 17, 2021 at 00:08
SO the first item was a guy who backed out of giving a commencement speech because someone didn't like his team mascot... I was thinking maybe you cou...
February 17, 2021 at 00:02
There's a plan - who are we talking about?
February 16, 2021 at 23:47
Indeed; I found the irony quite amusing.
February 16, 2021 at 22:33
It's fallible because it is subjective? But that's not right. Let's look at something really subjective - that pain in your toe, for example. You cann...
February 16, 2021 at 22:31
So... Universities ought give a platform to fools? I'm at a lose to see what your point is.
February 16, 2021 at 22:24
Hm. So we ought socialise the free market of ideas when the stuff we want said gets ignored?
February 16, 2021 at 22:02
I think Rousseau has the germ of a good point here - objectivity as the view not from nowhere, but from anywhere.
February 16, 2021 at 21:59
SO what do you make of 's discussion of smell and taste? And going back to this... What is it that is not shared? Take the example of Newton's cradle,...
February 16, 2021 at 21:53
...then we agree with @"unenlightened" that Universities ought not be obligated to provide a platform to fools.
February 16, 2021 at 21:41
Free speech does not entitle one to an audience; nor even to a platform.
February 16, 2021 at 21:38
I invite you to join in the conversation with @"Janus". I want to understand what is added by the word subjective: compare the following to what you s...
February 16, 2021 at 21:25
...and I don't know that it doesn't. Why preference the former? Besides, all indications are that we do see the same thing; and if we do not, we can t...
February 16, 2021 at 21:22
Then, again, what is it that is not shared?
February 16, 2021 at 21:13
Thanks for responding. I don't understand. You can see the same Cradle I see; what is it that you see that I don't? "perspective" - do you just mean t...
February 16, 2021 at 21:06
Cheers; What is it that is subjective in our observations of the cradle? What is it that is not shared in our observations of the cradle?
February 16, 2021 at 20:57
What is it that is subjective in our observations of the cradle?
February 16, 2021 at 20:55
with... "objective" or "intersubjective"?
February 16, 2021 at 20:53
Beautiful. Do we have a "quotable quotes" thread?
February 16, 2021 at 20:42
...that's close. Our talk about the word is conjured into being by use engaging in conversation... the limits of our language are the limits of our wo...
February 16, 2021 at 20:34
;et alia; Perhaps an example: each of us observes, say, a Newton's Cradle. The supposition is that we each have our own private sensations, which we t...
February 16, 2021 at 20:29
Oh, that't be dreadful. The unspoken stuff is of the highest import... If you are attributing that view to me, I have been misunderstood. Thanks for t...
February 16, 2021 at 20:25
Physics by poll vote...
February 16, 2021 at 20:18
Sure am. SO tell me, if the word choice is insignificant, why "intersubjective" rather than "objective" or even "shared"?
February 16, 2021 at 20:16
...because you already learned to use "sharp" and "stabbing"...
February 16, 2021 at 20:14
Is there something that is gained by using "intersubjective" that is not found in "shared? I think so - the model of a private subjective world intera...
February 16, 2021 at 06:58
Yeah, but it's a bad term. What happens in science is shared, sure - but why import the term "intersubjective" from the world of social constructionis...
February 16, 2021 at 06:49