You are viewing the historical archive of The Philosophy Forum.
For current discussions, visit the live forum.
Go to live forum

Banno

Comments

Is the argument that abduction can be used to pick out which theories are conspiracy theories? Then what counts as a conspiracy theory is which "concl...
October 03, 2025 at 23:26
Yes, and there's plenty more here to unpack. "Why" questions presume intent, in some aspect, and so all that goes with intentionality.
October 03, 2025 at 22:45
That nicely frames the incipient circularity in explaining causation in terms of evolution. To make use of evolutionary explanations, we are already t...
October 03, 2025 at 22:40
Let's see what @"Ludwig V" says, but it's clear Hume rejected the Aristotelian idea of causation, replacing it with habit and custom.
October 03, 2025 at 22:07
This is what I at first took T Clark to be saying, here: But perhaps not.
October 03, 2025 at 22:04
, a compelling line of thought. Good stuff. Ludwig rightly emphasizes that Hume rejects the idea of causation as a metaphysical reality. For Hume, cau...
October 03, 2025 at 22:01
Pathetic. "My daddy's a policeman..."
October 03, 2025 at 02:05
That's part of the problem... the idea is equivocal. Any way, back to the insults and misrepresentations from our friends.
October 03, 2025 at 01:09
Yep. On this we agree.
October 02, 2025 at 23:28
You've put up a few posts, to which I have not replied. That's becasue they appear to be addressing something very different to what I have actually s...
October 02, 2025 at 22:36
A philosopher worthy of attention in regard to conspiracy theories is Melina Tsapos. Maybe start with Who is a Conspiracy Theorist?, in which she sets...
October 02, 2025 at 21:24
Good. Feyerabend is mistaken, but in interesting ways. Perhaps the most important aspect of his writing is his drawing attention to how the normativel...
October 02, 2025 at 20:30
Go right ahead. Just don't conclude that such an explanation is true, which is what is needed if we are to overcome Hume's objection.
October 02, 2025 at 03:32
This was a side-kick at Aristotle's causes. Perhaps for Aristotle "fire is hot" is a description, but "fire is hot because heat is its essential natur...
October 02, 2025 at 03:31
If that's all it is, then fine. Add the word "best" - "creating the best explanatory hypotheses" - and it falls apart. So where you say "plausible" ad...
October 02, 2025 at 03:04
I'll accept that, if you will accept that the explanation is no more than a more usable description. :wink:
October 02, 2025 at 02:45
Ok, so what is it?
October 02, 2025 at 02:43
Noether’s theorem links symmetries to conservation laws - is that were you would go? Isn't describing things in terms of symmetry still describing the...
October 02, 2025 at 02:42
:wink: And is that better than "Be-cause it is the will of the Flying Spaghetti Monster"? I think not. What makes gravity a better account is F=Gm?m?/...
October 02, 2025 at 02:11
Seems to me you missed the argument. Oh well. Let's look at conspiracy theories. The classic analysis for my eye comes from Watkins, in his Confirmabl...
October 02, 2025 at 02:00
Good stuff. ...happens a lot more then it perhaps ought, around these fora. A favourite grump of mine. But if I may advocate for the devil, let's look...
October 02, 2025 at 01:38
there's a lot in that, a fair bit of it being quite agreeable, some less so. Here's, I think, the first use of "abduction" in this thread: Leaving asi...
October 02, 2025 at 00:04
Well, much appreciated. Kind of you to say.
October 01, 2025 at 23:14
Perhaps, but given it's abstruseness, I'm not sure we should even grant that.
October 01, 2025 at 22:53
Sure, science involves hunches, guesses, paradigm shifts — all the messiness Feyerabend loved. But dignifying that by calling it “abduction” is a mist...
October 01, 2025 at 22:35
This is a simple logical truth - a hypotheses being unfalsified does not make it more likely to be true. On this we agree. We could take a Bayesian ap...
October 01, 2025 at 22:33
His work is a bit broader than just that. His classic formulation, "anything goes", is of course mistaken; but the interesting bit is how it is mistak...
October 01, 2025 at 22:09
Please, disagree. Science is a human enterprise, and as such is communal. A picture of how science works must include the social aspects, looking at t...
October 01, 2025 at 21:47
Thanks for the notification. I hadn't seen this. A shame the focus is on his last few years rather than on his contributions to philosophy of language...
October 01, 2025 at 00:28
A neat example that supports the hypothesis that "abduction" - understood as accepting the best hypothesis - is central to scientific method. That's w...
September 30, 2025 at 23:00
Quite right. We need pay close attention to that last bit. We may indeed support one hypotheses over another, but the "why" cannot be based solely on ...
September 30, 2025 at 22:24
Should. But should it? We have before us quite different notions of abduction. Sometimes it is talked of as the process of forming an hypothesis. We k...
September 30, 2025 at 22:05
Well, yes - Conformation of the current scientific theory. Feyerabend would have a party here.
September 30, 2025 at 08:54
Cool. Nice and clean. Good stuff. A few issues. "Better" - an improvement on "best", but suffering the same ambiguity. If abduction is going to tell u...
September 30, 2025 at 08:52
Same here. To general disgust and annoyance. It's still large enough to make a difference, and the point - that labour may be divorced from government...
September 30, 2025 at 07:41
you really haven’t given a validation of abduction. If you really believe that the whole of abduction is just brainstorming, then you’re missing quite...
September 30, 2025 at 05:02
Pretty much. Abduction was perhaps an attempt to form an algorithmic method for science, back in the days when such things were thought important. Whe...
September 30, 2025 at 05:00
That's not what was said. But if you can set out what you think abduction is, and how it works, just go ahead and do so. I don't think anyone here can...
September 30, 2025 at 02:27
:wink: I wish you would think. Here's a thing - what does "abduction" mean? Even the SEP article can't say. So now you claim it's just making up an hy...
September 30, 2025 at 02:21
Indeed, and my reply was to reaffirm that the testing of an hypothesis is not part of performing an abduction. Abducting is choosing the "best" hypoth...
September 30, 2025 at 01:46
Yep. Just so. Do you? Ok, that's it's proposed use - how does it manage to do this? But there is no method for doing this - only what someone claims t...
September 30, 2025 at 01:19
Of course not. A rejection of one way that philosophers have claimed science works is not a rejection of science. That scientific theory is developed ...
September 30, 2025 at 00:17
That's a pretty clear account. You are waving words around as if they were arguments. What is abduction, and how does it help? And the answer is quite...
September 29, 2025 at 21:17
I took your point to be about the development of those countries - Brazil, Indonesia, Pakistan. As in, not about the population emigrating to Europe o...
September 29, 2025 at 07:52
While it's true that on balance China is a net creditor, so is Japan, along with Germany, Singapore, Taiwan... The USA is again outstanding in being a...
September 29, 2025 at 07:47
Chinese debt is about 75% of GDP.
September 29, 2025 at 06:23
All the data I see points to a 1% growth, decreasing steadily. Population is predicted to peek at 10.3 billion in 2084. The relation between labour an...
September 29, 2025 at 03:12
I think you were distracted away from a quite valid point.
September 27, 2025 at 00:43
Albo is streets ahead of the Libs. They are cutting each other up over "zero emissions" legislation. Australia recognised Palestine the other day, pis...
September 26, 2025 at 02:17
Yep. It's entropy all the way down. Old. I am surprised that Apo was reduced to name calling so quickly.
September 25, 2025 at 23:11